Case law

Stark v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

102 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1926

Appellant also testified: “It was a long board and it was all coming up, splinters and splinters and splinters.” … Cases of that character are typified by Schnatterer v. Bamberger, supra, where the fall was caused by tripping over a loosened metal nosing on the step of a staircase in a department store. Rom v. Huber, 93 N. J.

Olbis v. City Council of Clifton

123 N.J.L. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1939

It is said that this will constitute apportionment "according to the value of the several parcels”’ — • citing Luckenbach, &c., Inc., v. Township of North Bergen, 118 N. J. L. 348, and Bowers v. Bloomfield, 81 N. J.

Matter of Johnson

105 N.J. 249 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1987

Acting on a presentment filed by the District V-A Ethics Committee (Essex DEC) and five presentments filed by the District XII Ethics Committee (Union DEC), the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) determined that respondent, … Brown, 102 N.J. 512 (1986). [ 93 N.J. at 360 .]

Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough

47 N.J. 211 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 23, 1966

Ocean Township Board of Adjustment, 30 N.J. 245 (1959); Black v. Town of Montclair, 34 N.J. 105 (1961); Burton v. … See Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94 (1957).

Ford v. Gilbert

89 N.J.L. 482 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 28, 1916

Currie v. Atlantic City, 66 N. J. L. 140; affirmed by the Court of Errors and Appeals (on p. 671). See also Wilson v. Collingswood, 80 Id. 626, where Mr. … The resolution of the board of commissioners permitting twenty-one of the signers to withdraw from the original petition was unwarranted.

State v. Richard Perez (072624)

220 N.J. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 2015

Defendants subject to CSL are supervised by the Parole Board (Board) and face a variety of conditions beyond those imposed on non-sex-offender parolees. … In Doe v.

Allen v. Agnew

24 N.J.L. 443 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1854

Brown v. Bissett, 1 Zab. 46. … Heydon v. Heydon, Salk. 392; Eddie v. Davidson, 2 Doug. 650 ; 1 Arch. Prac. 269; Curtis v. Hollingshead, 2 Green, 402; Brown v. Bissett, 1 Zab. 50.

Dearborn Chemical Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals in State Department of Taxation

135 N.J.L. 580 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1947

We held in Halligan & McLellan, Inc., v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. L. 551; 6 Atl. … This statute has been held to be constitutional, Schwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 129 N. J. L. 129, and has been applied in other cases, Halligan & McLellan, Inc., v.

Higgins v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists

51 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1968

Board of Management Carteret Club of Elizabeth, 40 N. J. L. 295, 297 (Sup. Ct. 1878) ; Hurwitz v. Directors Guild of America, Inc., supra, at pp. 71—72; Annot., Professional Society—Membership, 89 A. L. … In Vanderbilt v. Mitchell, 72 N. J.

Juliano Construction Co. v. Bigelow

4 N.J. Misc. 182 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1926

On July 30th, 1925, the relator appealed to the board of adjustment of the city of Newark, organized under chapter 146 of the laws of 1924. … The case, in our opinion, falls within Ignaciunas v. Risley, 98 N. J. L. 712; affirmed, 125 Atl. Rep. 121 . The case of Builders Realty Co. v. Bigelow, 128 Id. 887, is directly in point.

Lewis v. Harris

188 N.J. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 25, 2006

We are told that when the Justices who decided Brown v. … Klarman, Brown and Lawrence (and Goodridge), 104 Mich. L.Rev. 431, 433 (2005).

In the Matter of Ridgefield Park Board of Education (083091) (Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 2020

On August 13, 2015, PERC decided Clementon Board of Education v. Clementon Education Ass’n, P.E.R.C. No. 2016-10, 42 N.J.P.E.R. ¶ 34, 2015 N.J. PERC LEXIS 76 (2015). … See Taxpayers Ass’n of Weymouth Twp. v.

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey City

80 N.J.L. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1910

Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Newark, 34 Vroom 310 . … State v. Hancock, 6 Vroom 536 .

County of Morris v. Skokowski

86 N.J. 419 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1981

See City of Camden v. Byrne, 82 N.J. 133, 145-146 (1980). … Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 598-599 (1965). Also, recognition must be given to the expertise of the Director and the Board in local government budgetary affairs. Cf. City of Atlantic City v.

State ex rel. Lane v. Otis

68 N.J.L. 656 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1903

Farrington v. Turner, 53 Mich. 27 , 51 Am. Rep. 88 ; Preston v. Culbertson, 58 Cal. 198 . … Peard v. State, 34 Neb. 372 .

Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of Belmar

14 N.J. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1954

Brower v. Franklin Township, 119 N. J. L. 417 (Sup. … Florio v. Jersey City, 101 N. J. L. 535 (E. & A. 1935); Wild v. Mayor, etc., of City of Paterson, 47 N. J. L. 406 (Sup. Ct. 1885); McDonald v. City of New Haven, 94 Conn. 403 , 109 A. 176 , 10 A. L. R. 193 (Sup. Ct.

State ex rel. Lane v. Otis

68 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

L. 1895, p. 82; *65 Hawkins v. Cook, 33 Vroom 84 ; Manahan v. Watts, 35 Id. 465. The ease of Davis v. Davis, 28 Vroom 203 , was decided prior to the act of 1895. … The board of registry and election threw out the township vote and gave a certificate of election to the relator. The board of chosen freeholders denied the relator’s right and seated the incumbent.

Rutgers v. Kugler

58 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 5, 1971

58 N.J. 113 (1971) 275 A.2d 441 RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. … Brown in the Law Division, 110 N.J. Super. 424 (1970). For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 5. For reversal — None.

State v. Tansimore

3 N.J. 516 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1950

This part of the charge, the defendant argues, is contrary to the rule stated in Brown v. … State v. Zeller, 7 N.J.L. 220 ( Sup. Ct. 1924); Brown v. State, 62 N.J.L. 666, 703 ( E. & A. 1899); State v. Silverio, 79 N.J.L. 482 ( E. & A. 1910); Allen v.

Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Borough of Cresskill

137 N.J.L. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1948

The board held a hearing and recommended that permission be granted to prosecutor. The council rejected the recommendation. … no threat to the safety, health, morals or general welfare of the community are excluded from the entire borough except upon the successful address by a property owner to the discretion of two municipal bodies (Weininger v.