Case law

In re Capodici

170 N.J. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2002

ORDER This matter having been presented to the Court on the recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board pursuant to Rule l:20-15(k) that JOSEPH V. … in DRB 99-245; and pays a sanction in the amount of $500.00 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the Order filed April 7, 1999; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that JOSEPH V.

Barnes v. Essex County Park Commission

85 N.J.L. 70 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1913

Clausen v. de Medina, 53 Vroom 491 ; Kennelly v. Jersey City, 28 Id. 293; Nicoulin v. Lowery, 20 Id. 391. … Clausen v. de Medina, supra. There the act authorizes *77 the board by rules and regulations “to limit and prevent the driving or travel thereon of loaded or heavy trucks, wagons or carts.” Pamph. L. 1891, p. 79, § 3.

Levy v. Mravlag

96 N.J.L. 367 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1921

The proceeding in this ease follows that taken to review a similar ordinance in Romar-Realty Co. v. Board of Commissioners, ante p. 117. … State v. Paterson, 34 N. J. L. 163 ; Foster v. Cafe May, 60 Id. 78; Harcourt v. Asbury Park, 60 Id. 158.

State v. Patton

133 N.J. 389 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 3, 1993

Referred to as “transactional” immunity, it “ ‘operate[s] as a complete pardon for the -offense to which [the compelled testimony] relates[.]’ ” Strong, supra, 110 N.J. at 589 , 542 A.2d 866 (quoting Brown v. … State v.

In re the Guardianship of Dotson

72 N.J. 112 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1976

Ed. 2d 899 (1963); Doug *124 las v. California, 372 U. S. 353 , 83 S. Ct. 814 , 9 L. Ed. 2d 811 (1963); Lane v. Brown, 372 U. S. 477 , 83 S. Ct. 768 , 9 L. Ed. 2d 892 (1963); Smith v. Bennett, 365 U. S. 708 , 81 S. … There it distinguished Stanley v. Illinois, supra, and Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U. S. 632 , 94 S. Ct. 791 , 39 L.

Commercial Realty & Resources Corp. v. First Atlantic Properties Co.

118 N.J. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1989

State v. Crowley

39 N.J.L. 264 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1877

People v. Taylor, 3 Denio 95 . … The case of State v.

Franklin v. City of Millville

98 N.J.L. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

This is now withdrawn, counsel submitting to the decision of the Supreme Court in Heston v. Atlantic City, 93 N. J. … Eecent cases on this point are Marten v. Brown, 81 N. J. L. 599, 601; State v. Shupe, 88 Id. 610; Ruggles v. Ocean Accident Corp., 89 Id. 180; McMichael v. Horay, 90 Id. 142, 145. The judgment will be affirmed.

Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of Paramus

163 N.J. 546 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 2000

Enters, v. … .”); Borntrager v.

State ex rel. Kelly v. Mayor of Paterson

35 N.J.L. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1871

Ex parte Rogers, 7 Cow. 526 ; Comm’rs of Knox Co. v. Aspinwall, 24 How. 376 ; People v. Contracting Board, 27 N. Y. 378, 386 ; State v. Rahway, 4 Vroom 110 , 111; State v. Elkinton, 1 Vroom 335 ; Moses on Mandamus 222. … Owing to the equal division of the board between the two political parties, and the factious refusal of some to take their seat in the board, the business of the city is greatly embarrassed, and a speedy remedy is needed.

Matter of Noonan

102 N.J. 157 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1986

This matter is before the Board based upon a presentment and a report recommending a private reprimand filed by the District V (Essex County) Ethics Committee. The matters were consolidated for hearing before the Board. … Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review "Board The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with this Court recommending that JOHN W.

Matter of McDonald

99 N.J. 78 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1985

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that EUGENE J. … In People v. Beattie, 137 Ill. 553, 574 , 27 N.E. 1096, 1104 (Sup.Ct.1891), the Court commenting on this duty, wrote: The lawyer’s duty is of a double character.

Pension Commission of the Police & Fire Department v. Atlantic City Fire Department Pension Fund

97 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1922

Chapter 160 of the laws of 1920 has been held to be constitutional by the Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of Hulme v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Trenton, 95 N. J. L. 545. … The case of Schwarzwaelder v. German Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 59 N. J. Eq. 589, is cited to sustain these contentions.

Richardson v. Radics

131 N.J.L. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1944

The County Board of Elections in examining the envelopes containing the ballots posted, according to the provisions of *407 R. … Court found that the unregistered service men could not vote, and since the ballots of the registered voters could not be segregated from the whole, all must be rejected in compliance with the principle laid down in Burkett v.

John A. Roebling's Corp. v. Bodrog

24 N.J. 604 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1957

The Board of Review found that Mr. … J. 313 (1955) was controlling. *607 The Bodrog and Kerecman claims are governed by the principles and holdings in Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, 24 N. J. 585 (1957) and Watson v.

Kitay v. Quigley

6 N.J. Misc. 623 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

After the refusal of the board of adjustment to reverse the ruling of the building inspector the writ of cerHoran in the instant case was allowed. In the case of Koplin v. … In order to reverse the action of a board of adjustment there must he evidence produced before the court that the action of the hoard of adjustment is wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 4 Id. 515.

State ex rel. Winans v. Commissioners of Highways

57 N.J.L. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894

in the board in regard to what course shall then be taken. … Morris v. Comptroller, 25 Vroom 268.

State ex rel. McCarthy v. Queen

76 N.J.L. 144 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1908

Section 1 provides that the new board created should appoint a superintendent in place of the present incumbent. This act was sustained. Baker v. Delaney, 26 Vroom 9 . Another act passed in the same year (Pamph. … In the case of Owens v.

Stokes v. New Jersey Pottery Co.

46 N.J.L. 237 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1884

Martin v. Webb, 110 U. S. 7 . … Stow v. Wyse, 7 Conn. 214; C. & N. R. R. Co. v. James, 14 Wis. 325 .

State ex rel. McLean v. Gibson

55 N.J.L. 11 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892

such boards •and relating to the municipal affairs and departments of such •cities placed under the control and management of such board -and providing for the maintenance of said board.” … The act thus disputed we are of opinion is constitutional •and valid, the reasons for such conclusions being the same as those given in Matkeson v. Caminade and Owens v. Fury, of the present term.