Case law

In re Erie-Lackawanna Railroad

48 N.J. 567 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1967

The question before us is whether the actions of the Board are supported by substantial evidence which furnishes a reasonable basis for the Board’s decisions. We noted in Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Central R. … J., Inc. v. Adams, 36 N. J. 288, 292 (1962).

State v. Feaster

156 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1998

See State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481 , 651 A.2d 19 (1994). … See State v.

Bruder v. Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund

27 N.J. 266 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 2, 1958

If he is correct the order will issue; if he is not it will be denied, Cooper v. State Board, 114 N. J. L. 10 (Sup. Ct. 1934), affirmed 115 N. J. … See also Race v. Board of Education of Town of Newton, 37 N. J. Super. 333 (App. Div. 1955). But, at the same time, N. J. S.

Advance Development Corp. v. Mayor of Jersey City

6 N.J. Misc. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1928

The case of Cleveland v. Board of Finance of Jersey City, 38 N. J. L. 259, supports the relator’s contention. … This argument is answered by the case of Cleveland v.

Doolittle v. Willet

57 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

Laible v. Ferry, 5 Stew. Eq. 791; Wild v. Davenport, 19 Vroom 129 . The judgment below should be affirmed. … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, .Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van S yokel, Bogert, Brown, .Krueger, Sims, Smith. 12. For reversal — None.

Bertsch v. Small Investments, Inc.

4 N.J. 520 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1950

Warrin v. Haverly, 159 App. Div. 840 , 144 N. Y. S. 1004 (1913). In Robinson v. Globe Indemnity Co., 251 App. Div. 288 , 296 N. Y. … Thus, in Paye v. City of Grosse Pointe, 279 Mich. 254 , 271 N.

Rowland v. County of Hudson

7 N.J. 63 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1951

Ely v. Newark, 76 N. J. L. 532 (E. & A. 1908), and Fletcher v. Board of Education, 85 N. J. L. 1 (Sup. Ct. 1913), go upon the proposition that the contracts sued upon were ultra vires the body which made them. … All of this is in the realm of what the Yew York Court of Appeals in Sargent v. *75 McLeod, 209 N. Y. 360 , 103 N. E. 164 (1913), calls the “unknowable.” In fact, the board, after Mr.

Mayor of Newark v. Weeks

70 N.J.L. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1903

Damages caused by the change were assessed by the board of assessment to Charles R. … Van Wagoner v. Paterson, 38 Vroom 455 ; Dean v. Paterson, Id. 199; S. C., 39 Id. 664. The writ was prematurely granted and is therefore dismissed, with costs.

Burlington County Evergreen Park Mental Hospital v. Cooper

56 N.J. 579 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1970

State ex rel Missey v. City of Cabool, 441 S. W. 2d 35 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 1969); and cf. *584 Zimmerman v. Board of Education of Newark, 38 N. J. 65, 80 (1962) (concurring opinion), cert. den. 371 U. S. 956 , 83 S. … In Helsby v. Board of Education of Cent. Sch. District No. 2, 59 Misc. 2d 943 , 301 N. Y. S. 2d 383 (Sup.

Giordano v. City Commission of the City of Newark

2 N.J. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1949

We approve of the practice, where practical, of a board of adjustment making an inspection of the site and tie neighborhood generally. Amon v. Rahway, 117 N. J. L. 589 (Sup. Ct. 1937). … Co. v. State Board, etc., 130 Id. 478 (E. & A. 1943).

Sherwood v. City of Paterson

88 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1915

We think the board of public works has the power to vacate streets. … say that the union of such a motive with other more public considerations might never be enough to vitiate the ordinance, we think we are safe in holding that the facts of the present case bring it within the rule of Kean v.

Cohen v. Cyzam Realty Co.

3 N.J. Misc. 1028 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1925

This instruction was in accordance with the rule laid down by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Brown v. Honniss, 70 N. J. L. 260, and the damages were assessed by the jury on the basis of this instruction.

In re Dreier

94 N.J. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 1983

The Board determined to deny this recommendation and to treat the report as a Presentment, and a hearing was subsequently held before the Board. … Washington learned that that docket number had no connection with their case, but was actually assigned to a matter captioned Simpson v. Horizon Motor Inn.

State v. Inhabitants of Summit

52 N.J.L. 483 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1890

of aldermen,, common council, city council, aqueduct board, board of public-works, water commissioners, township committee, town committee, or other board, body or department of any municipal corporation in this state, having … This objection was' considered in Van Giesen v.

State ex rel. McLean v. Gibson

55 N.J.L. 11 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892

such boards •and relating to the municipal affairs and departments of such •cities placed under the control and management of such board -and providing for the maintenance of said board.” … The act thus disputed we are of opinion is constitutional •and valid, the reasons for such conclusions being the same as those given in Matkeson v. Caminade and Owens v. Fury, of the present term.

STATE BY VAN RIPER v. Atlantic City Electric Co.

23 N.J. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1957

these statements were accepted by the Board. … E. g., Miller v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, supra; Fratt v. Robinson, 203 F. 2d 627 , 37 A. L. R. 2d 636 (9 Cir. 1953). Eor an illuminating discussion of the principle involved see Schmidt v.

Polhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.

74 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907

Subr., §§ 1, 3; Wilson v. Brown (1861), 2 Beas. 277, 278; Irick v. Black (1864), 2 C. E. Gr. 189, 195; Philadelphia and Pleading Railroad Co. v. Little (1886), 14 Stew. Eq. 519, 529. … See Aycrigg’s Executors v. New York and Erie Railroad Co. (1864), 1 Vroom 460 , 461; Furniture Company v. Board of Education (1896), 29 Id. 646, 648.

In re Paschon

118 N.J. 430 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 14, 1990

*431 ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with this Court recommending that ROBERT V. … of the file of said ROBERT V.

Lippincott v. T. B. McGuire, Inc.

130 N.J.L. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1943

in order to procure from that board a certificate of acquisition. … Breithart v. Lurich, 98 N. J. L. 556; Glickfeld v. Venokur, 15 N. J. Mis. R. 522; affirmed, 119 N. J. L. 431. The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City v. Hennessey

92 N.J.L. 606 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1919

that the penalty for such violation “shall be recovered in an action of debt by and in the name of the board of health of the State of New Jersey, or by and in the name of any board of health of any municipality of this … In Eldridge v. Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Co., 83 N. J. L. 463, Mr. Justice Garrison, speaking for this court, cites with approval the following excerpt from the opinion in Harrington’s Sons Co. v.