Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.02s
134 N.J.L. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1946
Hearing was held by the Board on September 9th, 1943. … This holding was followed in Kornylak v. Hague, 8 N. J. *289 Mis. R. 481; 150 Atl. Rep. 669 ; Pabst v. Ferner, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 621; 151 Atl. Rep. 368 ; Dickinson v. Busch, 122 N. J. L. 71.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPolhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.
74 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907
Subr., §§ 1, 3; Wilson v. Brown (1861), 2 Beas. 277, 278; Irick v. Black (1864), 2 C. E. Gr. 189, 195; Philadelphia and Pleading Railroad Co. v. Little (1886), 14 Stew. Eq. 519, 529. … See Aycrigg’s Executors v. New York and Erie Railroad Co. (1864), 1 Vroom 460 , 461; Furniture Company v. Board of Education (1896), 29 Id. 646, 648.
Cited 21 timesPublishedHohl v. Township of Readington
37 N.J. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1962
Pie rro v. Baxendale, supra; Fischer v. The Township of Bedminster, supra; Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Township of Wayne, supra. … Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952).”
Cited 24 timesPublishedSpickofsky v. Bd. of Adjustment of E. Rutherford
137 N.J.L. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 23, 1948
At the conclusion of its hearing the Board announced that its members would investigate the matter and render its determination. Members of the Board examined the premises and made certain interrogations. … See Weisman v. Spoerer (Supreme Court, 1933), 11 N. J. Mis. R. 731; Pieretti v. Johnson (Supreme Court, 1945), 132 N. J. L. 576, 577. The determination of the Board of Adjustment is reversed and set aside.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalker v. Township of North Bergen
84 N.J.L. 248 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1913
Stat., p. 4526), tlie powers of the board with respect to such county roads have been transferred to and vested in the board of boulevard commissioners. … Justiee Swayze in Wilson v.
Cited 2 timesPublished156 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1998
See State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481 , 651 A.2d 19 (1994). … See State v.
Cited 167 timesPublished57 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894
Laible v. Ferry, 5 Stew. Eq. 791; Wild v. Davenport, 19 Vroom 129 . The judgment below should be affirmed. … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, .Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van S yokel, Bogert, Brown, .Krueger, Sims, Smith. 12. For reversal — None.
Cited 6 timesPublished5 N.J. Misc. 124 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 18, 1927
L. 1926, p. 526), and the holding in Chancellor Development Corp. v. Senior, 4 N. J. Mis. … R. 633, based upon such act and the proceeding upon appeal to, and the judgment of, the board of adjustment is ineffective under Losick v. Binda, 3 N. J. Adv. R. 1691.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital
107 N.J. 240 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1987
See Desai v. St. Barnabas Medical Center, supra, 103 N.J. at 98; Berman v. Valley Hosp., supra, 103 N.J. at 114. We base that conclusion on the fact that since the Board of Governors voted to terminate Dr. … Only six of the former members remain on the Board. If Dr.
Cited 26 timesPublished38 N.J. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1962
McDonough v. Grand Trunk W. R. Co., 357 Ill. 493 , 192 N. E. 645 (Sup. Ct. 1934); Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Board of Comm’rs, 54 Kan. 781 , 39 P. 1039 (Sup. Ct. 1895). … Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, supra (16 N. J. 329) is not inconsistent with our view. There assessments in selected areas were revised upward upon the order of the county board.
Cited 24 timesPublishedParker v. Borough of Point Pleasant
11 N.J. Misc. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1933
Oliver v. Jersey City, 63 N. J. L. 99; 42 Atl. Rep. 782 ; Millville v. Board of Education, 100 N. J. Eq. 162; 134 Atl. Rep. 748 ; affirmed, 101 N. J. Eq. 303; 137 Atl. Rep. 916 . … Riddle v. Commissioner of Banking and Insurance, 100 Atl. Rep. 692 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedGiordano v. City Commission of the City of Newark
2 N.J. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1949
We approve of the practice, where practical, of a board of adjustment making an inspection of the site and tie neighborhood generally. Amon v. Rahway, 117 N. J. L. 589 (Sup. Ct. 1937). … Co. v. State Board, etc., 130 Id. 478 (E. & A. 1943).
Cited 45 timesPublished110 N.J.L. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1933
On the other mornings when he boarded the train it stopped in about the same place. … The case of Trapnell v. Hines, 268 Fed. Rep. 504, which dealt with an accident occurring in this state, while differing somewhat factually, yet is in principle analogous to the case now under consideration.
Cited 0 timesPublished40 N.J.L. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1878
In Evans v. City of Trenton, 4 Zab. 765, the court say: “ It is a well-settled rule that a person accepting a public office with a fixed salary, is bound to perform the duties for the salary. … This view of the case is fully sustained by the reasoning of the court in Ramson v. Mayor, &c., of New York, 24 Barb. 226 .
Cited 3 timesPublished91 N.J. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 28, 1982
The Board notes the Committee’s reference to pertinent case law. … Klacik v. Kovacs, 111 N.J.Super. 307, 311-2 (App.Div.1970).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Jersey Ass'n of Health Care Facilities v. Finley
83 N.J. 67 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 28, 1980
State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J.Eq. 504, 519 (E. & A.1935). The Commissioner’s power to act in this critical area must be recognized. II. … The Board is part of the Department of Health.
Cited 51 timesPublishedWohlgemuth Bus Co. v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport
125 N.J.L. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1940
Whitehead v. Board, 108 N. J. L. 258, 260, 261. … Murphy v. Board, 119 N. J. L. 337; affirmed, 121 Id. 75.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdvance Development Corp. v. Mayor of Jersey City
6 N.J. Misc. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1928
The case of Cleveland v. Board of Finance of Jersey City, 38 N. J. L. 259, supports the relator’s contention. … This argument is answered by the case of Cleveland v.
Cited 2 timesPublished70 N.J.L. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1903
Damages caused by the change were assessed by the board of assessment to Charles R. … Van Wagoner v. Paterson, 38 Vroom 455 ; Dean v. Paterson, Id. 199; S. C., 39 Id. 664. The writ was prematurely granted and is therefore dismissed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Wright v. Campbell
74 N.J.L. 82 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1906
In Feurey, Clerk, &c., v. Roe, late Clerk, &c., 6 Vroom 123 , it was held that under an act to provide for a board of chosen freeholders of Hudson county (Pamph. … I am of the opinion, however, that the Election act of 1905 does not apply to the officers of the board of chosen freeholders elected by that board. They are not expressly mentioned in the act.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna