Case law

Walker v. Township of North Bergen

84 N.J.L. 248 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1913

Stat., p. 4526), tlie powers of the board with respect to such county roads have been transferred to and vested in the board of boulevard commissioners. … Justiee Swayze in Wilson v.

Everett v. Town of Montclair

14 N.J. Misc. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1936

Foley v. City of Orange, 91 N. J. L. 554; 103 Atl. Rep. 743 . … Orre et al., v. Roosma et al., 14 N. J. Mis. R. 529, wherein Circuit Court Judge Wolber reviews the cases on the point here involved.)

Advance Development Corp. v. Mayor of Jersey City

6 N.J. Misc. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1928

The case of Cleveland v. Board of Finance of Jersey City, 38 N. J. L. 259, supports the relator’s contention. … This argument is answered by the case of Cleveland v.

Packard Bamberger Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Pharmacy

134 N.J.L. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1946

The Board of Pharmacy is vested with discretionary power in the granting of permits and under the law the judgment of the Board should not be set aside unless its action was discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious, in other … Zicherman v. Driscoll, 133 N. J. L. 586. As was said in Librizzi v.

Schwarz v. Mayor of Dover

70 N.J.L. 502 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 40 Vroom 291 . … Thereupon the power of the court to appoint the board, and the powers and ju^dictibN^TTEeboard when app oiMéd?lire3CT^d^oÍÍIwTro5rtEÍ*^tan¿.not by delegation from the council. . In Riley v.

State v. Bradway

118 N.J.L. 17 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1937

Justice Yan Syckel in State v. Halsted, 39 N. J. … So also in State v. Brom, 78 Id. 222, in which the Halsted case was cited and followed, the late Mr.

State v. Feaster

156 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1998

See State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481 , 651 A.2d 19 (1994). … See State v.

Sherwood v. City of Paterson

88 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1915

We think the board of public works has the power to vacate streets. … say that the union of such a motive with other more public considerations might never be enough to vitiate the ordinance, we think we are safe in holding that the facts of the present case bring it within the rule of Kean v.

City of Trenton v. Trenton Masonic Temple Ass'n

8 N.J. Misc. 778 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1930

Nevin v. Krollman, Collector, 9 Vr. 574 ; State Board v. Morris and Essex Railroad Co., 20 Id. 193; State Board v. Paterson, &c., Railroad Co., 21 Id. 446. … The judgment of the state board will be affirmed.

Cohen v. Cyzam Realty Co.

3 N.J. Misc. 1028 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1925

This instruction was in accordance with the rule laid down by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Brown v. Honniss, 70 N. J. L. 260, and the damages were assessed by the jury on the basis of this instruction.

State v. Mayor of Paterson

40 N.J.L. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1878

In Evans v. City of Trenton, 4 Zab. 765, the court say: “ It is a well-settled rule that a person accepting a public office with a fixed salary, is bound to perform the duties for the salary. … This view of the case is fully sustained by the reasoning of the court in Ramson v. Mayor, &c., of New York, 24 Barb. 226 .

In re Dreier

94 N.J. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 1983

The Board determined to deny this recommendation and to treat the report as a Presentment, and a hearing was subsequently held before the Board. … Washington learned that that docket number had no connection with their case, but was actually assigned to a matter captioned Simpson v. Horizon Motor Inn.

Wohlgemuth Bus Co. v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport

125 N.J.L. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1940

Whitehead v. Board, 108 N. J. L. 258, 260, 261. … Murphy v. Board, 119 N. J. L. 337; affirmed, 121 Id. 75.

State ex rel. McLean v. Gibson

55 N.J.L. 11 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892

such boards •and relating to the municipal affairs and departments of such •cities placed under the control and management of such board -and providing for the maintenance of said board.” … The act thus disputed we are of opinion is constitutional •and valid, the reasons for such conclusions being the same as those given in Matkeson v. Caminade and Owens v. Fury, of the present term.

STATE BY VAN RIPER v. Atlantic City Electric Co.

23 N.J. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1957

these statements were accepted by the Board. … E. g., Miller v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, supra; Fratt v. Robinson, 203 F. 2d 627 , 37 A. L. R. 2d 636 (9 Cir. 1953). Eor an illuminating discussion of the principle involved see Schmidt v.

Polhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.

74 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907

Subr., §§ 1, 3; Wilson v. Brown (1861), 2 Beas. 277, 278; Irick v. Black (1864), 2 C. E. Gr. 189, 195; Philadelphia and Pleading Railroad Co. v. Little (1886), 14 Stew. Eq. 519, 529. … See Aycrigg’s Executors v. New York and Erie Railroad Co. (1864), 1 Vroom 460 , 461; Furniture Company v. Board of Education (1896), 29 Id. 646, 648.

Doolittle v. Willet

57 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

Laible v. Ferry, 5 Stew. Eq. 791; Wild v. Davenport, 19 Vroom 129 . The judgment below should be affirmed. … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, .Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van S yokel, Bogert, Brown, .Krueger, Sims, Smith. 12. For reversal — None.

Mayor of Newark v. Weeks

70 N.J.L. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1903

Damages caused by the change were assessed by the board of assessment to Charles R. … Van Wagoner v. Paterson, 38 Vroom 455 ; Dean v. Paterson, Id. 199; S. C., 39 Id. 664. The writ was prematurely granted and is therefore dismissed, with costs.

AMG Associates v. Township of Springfield

65 N.J. 101 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 9, 1974

W. 2d 6 (1962); Baronoff v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 385 Pa. 110 , 122 A. 2d 65 (1956); cf. North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Thomaston, 30 N. Y. 2d 238, 331 N. Y. … See generally Deal Gardens, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Loch Arbour, 48 N. J. 492, 496—498 (1967) and cases cited therein; Bow and Arrow Manor v. Town of West Orange, 63 N. J. 335, 350 (1973); Petlin Associates v.

Lippincott v. T. B. McGuire, Inc.

130 N.J.L. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1943

in order to procure from that board a certificate of acquisition. … Breithart v. Lurich, 98 N. J. L. 556; Glickfeld v. Venokur, 15 N. J. Mis. R. 522; affirmed, 119 N. J. L. 431. The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.