Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • Wilson v. Burk

    83 N.J.L. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1912

    This ease is governed by our decision in Salter v. Burk, supra. … Ziegler v. Burk, post p. 207. The question of the power of the board to dimmish the number of commissLoners of assessment of taxes does not arise in this case. The resolution brought up will be affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Halsted

    39 N.J.L. 640 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1877

    to the board simply a discretion to accept or reject. … State v. Halsted, ante p. 402. The issue of these bonds would, therefore, have been contrary to the policy of that statute, and the court should not permit, much less command it. Siedler v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation

    122 N.J.L. 594 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1939

    The judgment under review will be set aside for the reasons stated in Duke Power Co. v. The Essex County Board of Taxation and the City of Newark, 122 N.J.L. 589 . *Page 595

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fairview Heights Cemetery Co. v. Fay

    90 N.J.L. 427 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1917

    Mausoleum Builders v. State Board, &c., 88 N. J. L. 592; Cooper Hospital v. Camden, 70 Id. 478; Rosedale Cemetery Co. v. Linden, 73 Id. 421. … Pleasant Cemetery v. Newark, 89 N. J. L. 255; Rosedale Cemetery v. Linden, supra; Mausoleum Builders v. State Board, ante p. 163.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Sun Holding Co.

    134 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 22, 1946

    Vide Trenton and Mercer County Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 92 N. J. L. 398; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 Id. 28. … As this court said in Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lambertville Water Company v. Nj Bd. Pub. Util. Commr's.

    79 N.J. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1979

    LAMBERTVILLE WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 27, 1978. Decided May 7, 1979. *450 Mr. Bertram P. … In Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 381 A. 2d 1080 (Me. 1977), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine had before it a statute dealing with increases in public utility rates.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Zellers v. Cumberland Traction Co.

    3 N.J. Misc. 103 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1925

    The operation without such permits and approval, the board held was unlawful. … This point was considered by Vice-Chancellor Learning in the case of Healey v. Sidonc, filed May 26th, 1924.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Economy Auto Supply Co. v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

    105 N.J.L. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1928

    Later in Dennis Metal Manufacturing Co. v. … A provision of the by-laws and, a resolution of the board are urged by the appellant for such authority.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.

    39 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 1962

    Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., supra; Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200 (1949); Rockaway Estates v. Rockaway Tp., 38 N. J. Super. 468 (App. Div. 1955); Greenway Homes v. … We are not concerned with, a residential development which originated after the adoption of the municipal ordinance establishing the planning board and regulating land subdivision. Cf. Levin v.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Lane v. Bigelow

    135 N.J.L. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 17, 1947

    Burmore v. Smith, 124 N. J. L. 541, 546, 547; 12 Atl. Rep. (2d) 353. But each zoning case stands upon its own facts. Cook v. Board of Adjustment, Trenton, 118 N. J. L. 372, 375; 193 Atl. Rep. 191 ; Bianchi v. … Conaway v. Atlantic City, 107 N. J. L. 404, 408; 354 Atl. Rep. 6 . Cf. Redcay v. State Board of Education, 128 N. J. L. 281; 25 Atl. Rep. (2d) 632. The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Jaffe v. Zilinski

    14 N.J. 24 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1953

    Cropper v. Brown, 76 N. J. Eq. 406 (Ch. 1909). … v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Richard W. Berg v. Hon. Christopher J. Christie(074612)

    225 N.J. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 2016

    BROWN, AND ANNE K. BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS, Defendants. … BROWN, AND ANNE K. BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS, Defendants.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • New York & Greenwood Lake Railway Co. v. Mayor of Newark

    79 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1910

    The whole tract was assessed by the state board of railroad assessors as property used for railroad purposes outside of the main stem. … New Jersey Junction Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 34 Vroom 120 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Hudson County Board of Taxation

    128 N.J.L. 574 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 4, 1942

    Ex parte Rogers, 7 Cow. 526 ; Commissioners of Knox Co. v. Aspinwall, 24 How. 376 ; People v. Contracting Board, 27 N. Y. 378, 386 ; State v. Rahway, 4 Vr. 110 , 111; State v. … Rex v. Owen, 5 Mod. 314; Rex v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Pub. Ser. Elec. & Gas Co.

    167 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 2001

    Flanagan v. Department of Civil Serv., 29 N.J. 1, 12 , 148 A. 2d 14 (1959); see Close v. … See Fiore v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Matter of James

    112 N.J. 580 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1988

    In another context, the clear and convincing standard was described in State v. … See State v. Hodge, supra, 95 N.J. at 376 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Reck Milk Co. v. Humphreys

    119 N.J.L. 526 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1938

    Justice Heher) in State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504; 179 Atl. Rep. 116 . The decision in that case is controlling so far as the constitutionality of the act now before us is concerned. … Nebbia v. New York, 291 U. 8. 502; 78 L. Ed. 940 ; Paterson Milk Co., Inc., v. Milk Control, &c., New Jersey (Supreme Court), 118 N. J. L. 383; 192 Atl. Rep. 838 , and see, also, Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of Paramus

    163 N.J. 546 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 2000

    Enters, v. … .”); Borntrager v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State v. City of Elizabeth

    56 N.J.L. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

    In Bingham, v. … The cases of Satterly v. Camden Common Pleas, 12 Vroom 495 ; Tiger v. Court of Common Pleas, 13 Id. 631; Hightstown v. Glenn, 18 Id. 105, 108; Paul v. Gloucester, 21 Id. 585, 609; Pell v. Newark, 11 Id. 550; Richards v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Van Ness v. Borough of Haledon

    135 N.J.L. 222 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 18, 1947

    Campbell v. Hackensack, 115 N. J. L. 209; 178 Atl. Rep. 794 . … Rojeski v. Pennington Dairy Farms, Inc., 118 N. J. L. 335; 192 Atl. Rep. 746 ; Brower v. Franklin Township et al., 119 N. J. L. 417; 197 Atl. Rep. 367 ; Essbee Amusement Corp. v. Greenhaus, 114 N. J. L. 492; 177 Atl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.