Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.39s
70 N.J.L. 615 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 28, 1903
By section 23 of the charter of Paterson the board of aider-men is empowered to judge of the qualifications of its members. … Armstrong v. Whitehead, 38 Vroom 405 . The board of aldermen formally considered the question on February 16th, 1903, and decided in favor of the incumbent.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcAlpine v. Garfield Water Commission
135 N.J.L. 497 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1947
A similar situation was presented in the later case of Kelly v. Bishop, 119 Atl. … This court in the case of Long v. Daly, 105 N. J. L. 492; 144 Atl. Rep. 588 , approved the doctrine above quoted from Kelly v. Bishop as being sufficient in itself to set aside the action of a board or commission.
Cited 15 timesPublished36 N.J.L. 394 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1873
Co. v. … Com. v. Ryan, 5 Mass. 91 ; Hill v. Wells, 6 Pick. 105 ; Com. v. Reed, 1 Gray 472 ; Com. v. McLane, 4 Gray 427 . In this state, in Parsell v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn Re Education Law Center, Inc.
86 N.J. 124 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1981
See generally Unger v. Landlords’ Management Corporation, 114 N.J.Eq. 68, 72-73 (Ch.1933); In re Co-operative Law Co., 198 N.Y. 479 , 92 N.E. 15 (1910); People v. … Laurel v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedCity of East Orange v. Civil Service Commission
132 N.J.L. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 21, 1944
Newark v. Civil Service Commission, 115 N. J. L. 26. … Compare City of Camden v. Civil Service Commission, 118 N. J. L. 501. See, also, Newark v. Civil Service Commission, 114 Id. 406. The judgment of the Civil Service Commission is accordingly affirmed, with costs.
Cited 5 timesPublished83 N.J.L. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1912
., &c., v. … Eckersly v. Abbott, 50 Vroom 157 ; Parnes v. Commissioners of Elizabeth, 53 Id. 285 .
Cited 1 timesPublished123 N.J.L. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 29, 1939
This finding has not been overruled but, on the contrary, has in principle been affirmed by this court in Del Mar v. Bergen, 117 Id. 337, 386; State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504, 520; Cf. … West *446 Orange v. State Board, 115 N. J. L. 396; affirmed, 116 Id. 414. See, also, Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388, 421 ; 79 L. Ed. 446 ; 55 Sup. Ct. Rep. 241; Schecter v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedVulcan Wheels, Inc. v. Thayer-Martin
13 N.J. Misc. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1935
The state board of tax appeals affirmed this levy; and the corporation sued out a writ of certiorari. … Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. L. 583; 65 Atl. Rep. *525 913 . Goldstein Fineberg Co. v. Board of Assessors, 83 N. J. L. 61; 83 Atl. Rep. 773 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedLambertville Water Company v. Nj Bd. Pub. Util. Commr's.
79 N.J. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1979
LAMBERTVILLE WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 27, 1978. Decided May 7, 1979. *450 Mr. Bertram P. … In Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 381 A. 2d 1080 (Me. 1977), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine had before it a statute dealing with increases in public utility rates.
Cited 1 timesPublishedZellers v. Cumberland Traction Co.
3 N.J. Misc. 103 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1925
The operation without such permits and approval, the board held was unlawful. … This point was considered by Vice-Chancellor Learning in the case of Healey v. Sidonc, filed May 26th, 1924.
Cited 1 timesPublished42 N.J.L. 118 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1880
“Certiorari,” (9); Patchen v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 13 Wend. 664 ; Mairs v. Sparks, 2 South. 514 ; Kingsland v. Gould, 1 Halst. 161; McWilliams v. King, 3 Vroom 21 . … State, Ropes, pros., v. Essex Public Road Board, 8 Vroom 335 ; State, Hoboken L. & I. Co., pros., v. Hoboken, 7 Vroom 291 ; State, Wilkinson, pros., v. Inhabitants of Trenton, Id. 499.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNew York & Greenwood Lake Railway Co. v. Mayor of Newark
79 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1910
The whole tract was assessed by the state board of railroad assessors as property used for railroad purposes outside of the main stem. … New Jersey Junction Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 34 Vroom 120 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Hudson County Board of Taxation
128 N.J.L. 574 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 4, 1942
Ex parte Rogers, 7 Cow. 526 ; Commissioners of Knox Co. v. Aspinwall, 24 How. 376 ; People v. Contracting Board, 27 N. Y. 378, 386 ; State v. Rahway, 4 Vr. 110 , 111; State v. … Rex v. Owen, 5 Mod. 314; Rex v.
Cited 0 timesPublished46 N.J.L. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884
In State v. … People v. New York, 5 Barb. 45 ; Howeth v. Jersey City, 1 Vroom 93 ; Haight v. Love, 15 Vroom 20 ; Mabon v. Halsted, Director, 10 Vroom 640 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re Pub. Ser. Elec. & Gas Co.
167 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 2001
Flanagan v. Department of Civil Serv., 29 N.J. 1, 12 , 148 A. 2d 14 (1959); see Close v. … See Fiore v.
Cited 46 timesPublished19 N.J. 578 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1955
The Board of Review questions whether the employer is entitled to judicial review when, although given due notice, the company did not appear at the hearing before the Board nor apply for a rehearing pursuant to Board Rule … The constraints upon the interpretative process against reference to introducers’ statements adverted to in Board of National Missions v. Neeld, 9 N.
Cited 39 timesPublished39 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1963
Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County v. Brenner, 25 N. J. Super. 557 (App. Div. 1953), affirmed o. b. sub nom. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County v. Smith, 14 N. J. 348 (1954), relied on by Mr. … •Instances of the latter may be found in Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County v. Bayonne, 54 N. J. L. 293 (Sup. Ct. 1892), and Borough of Paramus in Bergen County v. Bergen County, 25 N. J. 492 (1958).
Cited 75 timesPublished83 N.J.L. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1912
This ease is governed by our decision in Salter v. Burk, supra. … Ziegler v. Burk, post p. 207. The question of the power of the board to dimmish the number of commissLoners of assessment of taxes does not arise in this case. The resolution brought up will be affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished37 N.J.L. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1875
In Trask v. … These proceedings, on the part of this board, dispenses with the meeting of the county board of assessors, whose meeting on the first Monday in September, under the general tax law', is abolished.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTomu Development Co. v. Borough of Carlstadt
197 N.J. 474 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 2009
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
Ask Donna