Case law

VanSchoick v. VanSchoick

76 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

Golden v. Knapp, 12 Vroom 215 ; Furniture Co. v. Board of Education, 29 Id. 646. The third count is rested upon that part of the agreement which directs the defendant Elmer E. … Perdicaris v. Trenton City Bridge Co., 5 Dutcher 367; Weber v. M. & D. R. R. Co., 6 Vroom 409 ; Astor v. Heller, 32 Id. 78. The plaintiff is entitled to costs against the defendant Harriet E.

Wakeman v. Dodd

27 N.J. Eq. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1876

Perf., §§ 332, 336, 337; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 511, and the cases cited-i-n note 3. ■This rule of pleading was not drawn in question in the Xew Jersey cases referred to in the opinion below, viz., Combs y. … Little, 3 Creeps Ch. 310; Marlatt v. Warwick and Smith, ■ 3 C. E. Gh'een 109, and 4 C. E. Gh'een 441; Merritt v. Brown, ■6 C. E. Gh'een 404. In Walker v. Hill’é Executors, decided in this court, 7 C. E.

Hohl v. Township of Readington

37 N.J. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1962

Pie rro v. Baxendale, supra; Fischer v. The Township of Bedminster, supra; Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Township of Wayne, supra. … Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952).”

Siller v. Hartz Mountain Associates

93 N.J. 370 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1983

Condominium Ass’n v. … See, e.g., Papalexiou v. Tower West Condo *383 minium, 167 N.J.Super. 516, 527 (Ch.Div.1979); Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S. W.2d 196, 198 (Mo.Ct.App.1976); Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v.

Tim v. City of Long Branch

134 N.J.L. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1946

Hearing was held by the Board on September 9th, 1943. … This holding was followed in Kornylak v. Hague, 8 N. J. *289 Mis. R. 481; 150 Atl. Rep. 669 ; Pabst v. Ferner, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 621; 151 Atl. Rep. 368 ; Dickinson v. Busch, 122 N. J. L. 71.

Matter of Herman.

108 N.J. 66 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1987

This matter arises from a report of the Disciplinary Review Board (Board or DRB) recommending that respondent, Steven Allan Herman, be suspended from the practice of law for a minimum period of three years from the time of … See State v. Postorino, 53 Wis. 2d 412 , 193 N.W .2d 1, 4 (1972). The discipline to be imposed must accord with the seriousness of the misconduct in light of relevant circumstances.

Levine v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIES

84 N.J. 234 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1980

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873, 880 (1954); see Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 213 , 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1532 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15, 24 (1972); Tinker v. … Washington National Insurance Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 553 (1949); accord, Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 79 (1978).

Avalon Home & Land Owners Ass'n v. Borough of Avalon

111 N.J. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1988

Hantman v. … PRB Enterprises, Inc. v.

State v. Mayor of Jersey City

47 N.J.L. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1885

of finance and taxation for that of the board of aldermen. … This, as we have seen, could not be done without the concurrence of the board of finance and taxation, and by this board there has been no ratification. The whole law on this subject is briefly stated in Cory v.

Clayton v. Kervick

52 N.J. 138 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1968

Board of Trustees of State Colleges, 243 Md. 500 , 221 A. 2d 625 (1966); Button v. Day, 205 Va. 739 , 139 S. E. 2d 838 (1965); State ex rel. Board of Governors, etc. v. O’Brien, 142 W. Va. 88 , 94 S. … Board of Regents of State of Kansas, 167 Kan. 587 , 207 P. 2d 373 (1949); Jacobs v. Sharp, 211 Ark. 865 , 202 S. W. 2d 964 (1947); Geboski v. Montana Armory Board, 110 Mont. 487 , 103 P. 2d 679 (1940).

In re State

64 N.J. 231 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1974

See Sheraton-Kauai Corporation v. N. L. R. B., supra ( 439 F. 2d 1352 ). From the point of view of a court reviewing a Board decision on appropriate unit, the matter was succinctly put in Wheeler-Van Label Company v. N. … Flanagan v. Civil Service Dept., 29 N. J. 1, 12 (1959). This is the same rule as applies to judicial review of bargaining unit determinations by the National Labor Relations Board. Pack *259 ard Motor Co. v.

In Re Furino

210 N.J. 124 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 2012

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-391, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f)(1) (default by respondent), that RALPH Y. … date having ordered in D-46-11 that respondent be suspended from practice for a period of three months for the unethical conduct found in DRB 11-176 and DRB 11-205; And good cause appearing; *125 It is ORDERED that RALPH V.

Cino v. Driscoll

130 N.J.L. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1943

Ogden v. Robertson, 15 N.J.L. 124 , 126 , as to the suggested impropriety for so doing) and, over objection, he used the testimony given by the minors at the hearing before the Newark Board. … Redcay v. Board of Education, 128 N.J.L. 281 , 284 ; 25 Atl. Rep. (2 d ) 632.

Young v. Sabol

4 N.J. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1950

Epstein v. Fleck, 141 N. J. Eq. 486 (E. & A. 1948); White v. Risdon 140 N. J. Eq. 613, 614 and 615 (Ch. 1947); Poloha v. Rumane, 137 N. J. Eq. 167; affirmed, 140 N. J. Eq. 396 (E. & A. 1947); Hufnagel v. Scholp, 138 N. … Epstein v. Fleck, supra.

Handlon v. Town of Belleville

4 N.J. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1950

McFeely v. Board of Pension Commissioners, supra. … Murphy v. Farr, 11 N. J. L. 186 (Sup. Ct. 1829);' Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of Hoboken, 3 N. J. 494 (1950); McFeeley v. Board of Pension Commissioners, supra.

McMahon v. City of Bayonne

10 N.J. Misc. 1215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1932

Sleight v. Board of Education, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 523; 159 Atl. Rep. 707 . The Home Eule act (Pamph. L. 1917, ch. 152, as amended by Pamph. … appropriation was designed to and did include the rental requirements for the year 1931 for the lease sued upon; and, if this be so-, there was a compliance with section 6, article 11, of the Home Rule act, as construed in Viracola v.

Schnyder v. McGovern

2 N.J. Misc. 249 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1924

It is enough to say that the pith of them all may be obtained from the following two: *252 Moore v. Burdett, 62 N. J. … Sawter v. Shoenthal, 83 N. J.

Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.

130 N.J. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1992

Boroian, The Franchise Advantage 16-17 (1987); Harold Brown, Franchising: Trap for the Trusting 89 (1969). But cf. Neptune T. V. & Appliance Serv., Inc. v. Litton Sys., Inc., 190 N.J.Super. 153, 160 , 462 A.2d 595 (App. … The context in which the Legislature adopted the Act, see Board of Educ., Asbury Park v.

Am. Dream at Marlboro, LLC v. Planning Bd. of the Twp. of Marlboro

231 N.J. 202 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 2017

Holly v. Bates

7 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1951

Where there is proof to support the conclusion of the administrative board the appellate court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the board, Lakewood Express Serv. v. … We are pressed with the argument that our decision should be controlled by the decision of the former Court of Errors and Appeals in Schireson v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 130 N. J. L. 570 (E. & A. 1943).