Case law

Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Commission

71 N.J. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1976

See Slurzberg v. Bayonne, 39 N. J. 106, 114, 115 (1959); State v. Boncelet, 107 N. J. Super. 444, 450 (App. Div. 1969). … Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes, 28 N.

Walsh v. Hackensack Water Co.

13 N.J. Misc. 815 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1935

In order to remove the meter it was necessary to remove the boards which covered the pit that housed the meter. … La Brasca v. Hinchman, 81 N. J. L. 367; Broame v. New Jersey Conference, &c., 83 Id. 621 ; Charney v. Cohen, 94 Id. 381."

Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.

39 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 1962

Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., supra; Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200 (1949); Rockaway Estates v. Rockaway Tp., 38 N. J. Super. 468 (App. Div. 1955); Greenway Homes v. … We are not concerned with, a residential development which originated after the adoption of the municipal ordinance establishing the planning board and regulating land subdivision. Cf. Levin v.

Salter v. Burk

83 N.J.L. 152 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1912

Anderson v. Myers, 48 Vroom 186 ; Oliver v. Jersey City, 34 Id. 634; Loper v. Millville, 24 Id. 362; Heaviland v. Freeholders, 35 Id. 176. … Each attempts to fix a term less than that provided by law, which was beyond the power of ihe board. Nor could they fix an indefinite term. O’Rourke v.

Rumson Estates, Inc. v. Mayor of Fair Haven

177 N.J. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 5, 2003

Damurjian v. … P’ship v.

Franklin Savings Institution v. City of Newark

121 N.J.L. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1939

Cook v. Board of Adjustment, 118 N. J. L. 372; Shaiman v. Mayor, &c., Newark, 15 N. J. Mis. R. 437. … We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the board. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 274 U. S. 325 ; 71 L. Ed. 1076 . The writ is dismissed, with costs.

Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. City of Hoboken

22 N.J. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1956

more members, but less than the entire board. … . & A. 1947); Redcay v. State Board of Education, 128 N. J. L. 281 (Sup. Ct. 1942). As pointed out by Mr.

State ex rel. Daubman v. Smith

47 N.J.L. 200 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885

Rader v. Union, 10 Vroom 509 ; S. C., 12 Vroom 617 ; State, ex rel. Richards, v. Hammer, 13 Vroom 435 ; Van Riper v. North Plainfield, 14 Vroom 349 ; Snipe v. Shriner, 15 Vroom 206 ; Payne v. … Rader v. Union, supra. The right of the board to take the action on which relator relies, cannot be derived from the act of 1857.

VanSchoick v. VanSchoick

76 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

Golden v. Knapp, 12 Vroom 215 ; Furniture Co. v. Board of Education, 29 Id. 646. The third count is rested upon that part of the agreement which directs the defendant Elmer E. … Perdicaris v. Trenton City Bridge Co., 5 Dutcher 367; Weber v. M. & D. R. R. Co., 6 Vroom 409 ; Astor v. Heller, 32 Id. 78. The plaintiff is entitled to costs against the defendant Harriet E.

Wakeman v. Dodd

27 N.J. Eq. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1876

Perf., §§ 332, 336, 337; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 511, and the cases cited-i-n note 3. ■This rule of pleading was not drawn in question in the Xew Jersey cases referred to in the opinion below, viz., Combs y. … Little, 3 Creeps Ch. 310; Marlatt v. Warwick and Smith, ■ 3 C. E. Gh'een 109, and 4 C. E. Gh'een 441; Merritt v. Brown, ■6 C. E. Gh'een 404. In Walker v. Hill’é Executors, decided in this court, 7 C. E.

Wilson v. Savino

10 N.J. 11 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1952

Rogers v. Courier Post Co., 2 N. J. 393, 399 (1949); Kelly v. Hoffman, 137 N. J. L. 695, 697 (E. & A. 1948). … Assuming but not deciding that employment by a board member of the individual to whom the board awards a contract would constitute “interest” indirectly or otherwise on the part of the board member, it was not proved here

State v. City of Elizabeth

56 N.J.L. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

In Bingham, v. … The cases of Satterly v. Camden Common Pleas, 12 Vroom 495 ; Tiger v. Court of Common Pleas, 13 Id. 631; Hightstown v. Glenn, 18 Id. 105, 108; Paul v. Gloucester, 21 Id. 585, 609; Pell v. Newark, 11 Id. 550; Richards v.

State v. Halsted

39 N.J.L. 640 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1877

to the board simply a discretion to accept or reject. … State v. Halsted, ante p. 402. The issue of these bonds would, therefore, have been contrary to the policy of that statute, and the court should not permit, much less command it. Siedler v.

Kudlich v. Griffin

88 N.J.L. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 7, 1916

Salter v. Burk, 83 N. J. L. 152; Istvan v. Naar, 84 Id. 113. … See Goldberg v. Dorland, 56 N. J. L. 364; Cook v. Ramsey (Court of Erros and Appeals), 90 Atl. Rep. 265 ; Delaware River Transportation Co. v. Trenton, 86 N. J.

In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.

169 N.J. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 2001

Co. v. Pub. Utils. … Co. v. Pub. Serv.

Lohan v. Thompson

88 N.J.L. 40 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 1, 1915

The rule that must govern is the familiar one of Bumsted v. Govern, 47 N. J. L. 368; affirmed, 48 Id. 612. … L. 319, to Attorney-General v. McGuinness, 78 Id. 346, 381, our cases hold to the contrary. Only one thing remains.

Gerber v. BD. OF REV., ETC, NJ DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUS.

20 N.J. 561 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1956

Tea Co. v. N. J. Dept. of Labor, etc., 29 N. J. Super. 26 (App. Div. 1953), are distinguishable. Gerber v. Board of Review, etc., 36 N. J. Super. 322 (App. Div. 1955). … J. 308 (1953); Ablondi v. Board of Review, supra.

Doherty v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Hudson County

131 N.J.L. 556 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1944

Compare Carrick v. Hudson County, 126 N. J. L. 181. Such is the plain legislative design. … It is said that section 54:3-31, supra, has reference merely to traveling expenses incurred “by the board as a board — by members of the board while acting as a board either under B. S. 54:3-15 or B.

City of Jersey City v. Sun Holding Co.

134 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 22, 1946

Vide Trenton and Mercer County Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 92 N. J. L. 398; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 Id. 28. … As this court said in Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J.

Levine v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIES

84 N.J. 234 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1980

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873, 880 (1954); see Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 213 , 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1532 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15, 24 (1972); Tinker v. … Washington National Insurance Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 553 (1949); accord, Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 79 (1978).