Case law

Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford

68 N.J. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1975

The Board may grant the landlord a hardship rent increase to meet these payments. … The Rent Leveling Board shall require statements of income and expenses and current cash flow statements in connection with all such applications and prior to the granting of any increases the Rent Leveling Board shall give

Levin v. Township of Livingston

35 N.J. 500 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1961

With reference to the first classification, this court said in Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N. … Hilton Acres v. Klein, supra (64 N. J. Super., at p. 297) ; Cella v. Cedar Grove Board of Adjustment, 45 N. J. Super. 585 (Law Div. 1957).

In Re Furino

210 N.J. 122 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 2012

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-176 and DRB 11-205, concluding on the records certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f)(1) (default by respondent), that RALPH … V.

Mayor of Hoboken v. Martin

123 N.J.L. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 29, 1939

This finding has not been overruled but, on the contrary, has in principle been affirmed by this court in Del Mar v. Bergen, 117 Id. 337, 386; State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504, 520; Cf. … West *446 Orange v. State Board, 115 N. J. L. 396; affirmed, 116 Id. 414. See, also, Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388, 421 ; 79 L. Ed. 446 ; 55 Sup. Ct. Rep. 241; Schecter v.

Schwarz v. Mayor of Dover

70 N.J.L. 502 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 40 Vroom 291 . … Thereupon the power of the court to appoint the board, and the powers and ju^dictibN^TTEeboard when app oiMéd?lire3CT^d^oÍÍIwTro5rtEÍ*^tan¿.not by delegation from the council. . In Riley v.

In re Fagan

70 N.J.L. 341 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1904

rights of such boards. … The contention on the part of the incumbents is that, in construing these provisions, the court is controlled by the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of Ross v.

In Re Revision in Rates Filed by Nj Power & Light Co.

9 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 25, 1952

Public Service Coordinated Transport v. State, supra (p. 214); Atlantic City Sewerage Company v. *509 Board of Public Utility Commissioners, supra (p. 365); State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. … . & A. 1935); O'Brien v. Public Utility Board, 92 N. J. L. 587, 589 (E. & A. 1919); Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 84 N. J. L. 463, 467 (Sup. Ct. 1913), affirmed on reargument 87 N. J.

Russo v. TEACHERS'PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND

62 N.J. 142 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 1973

It was thereafter held in Shea v. Board of Trustees of Police & Firemen’s Retirement System, 116 N. J. Super. 348 (App. … In Titman v. Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund, 107 N. J. Super. 244, 246 (App.

In re Interest of J.A.

233 N.J. 432 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 2018

State v. Brown , 216 N.J. 508 , 526, 83 A.3d 45 (2014). The home is the singular place where the privacy interests of people are most profound. Ibid. … The State bears the burden of proving attenuation. *280 Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590 , 604, 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975).

Vulcan Wheels, Inc. v. Thayer-Martin

13 N.J. Misc. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1935

The state board of tax appeals affirmed this levy; and the corporation sued out a writ of certiorari. … Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. L. 583; 65 Atl. Rep. *525 913 . Goldstein Fineberg Co. v. Board of Assessors, 83 N. J. L. 61; 83 Atl. Rep. 773 .

Everett v. Town of Montclair

14 N.J. Misc. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1936

Foley v. City of Orange, 91 N. J. L. 554; 103 Atl. Rep. 743 . … Orre et al., v. Roosma et al., 14 N. J. Mis. R. 529, wherein Circuit Court Judge Wolber reviews the cases on the point here involved.)

Deaney v. Linen Thread Co.

19 N.J. 578 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1955

The Board of Review questions whether the employer is entitled to judicial review when, although given due notice, the company did not appear at the hearing before the Board nor apply for a rehearing pursuant to Board Rule … The constraints upon the interpretative process against reference to introducers’ statements adverted to in Board of National Missions v. Neeld, 9 N.

City of Camden v. Varney

63 N.J.L. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1899

It was decided by the unanimous judgment of this court in Demarest v. … Roche v. Jersey City, 11 Vroom 257 , approved in this court; Haynes v. Cape May, 23 Id. 180; De Ginther v. New Jersey Home, 29 Id. 354.

AMG Associates v. Township of Springfield

65 N.J. 101 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 9, 1974

W. 2d 6 (1962); Baronoff v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 385 Pa. 110 , 122 A. 2d 65 (1956); cf. North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Thomaston, 30 N. Y. 2d 238, 331 N. Y. … See generally Deal Gardens, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Loch Arbour, 48 N. J. 492, 496—498 (1967) and cases cited therein; Bow and Arrow Manor v. Town of West Orange, 63 N. J. 335, 350 (1973); Petlin Associates v.

In Re Application of Kershner

9 N.J. 471 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1952

DeSanto v. N. J. State Parole Board, 17 N. J. Super. 44 (App Div. 1951); State v. … State Parole Board, 17 N. J. Super. 44 (App. Div. 1951).

City of Trenton v. Trenton Masonic Temple Ass'n

8 N.J. Misc. 778 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1930

Nevin v. Krollman, Collector, 9 Vr. 574 ; State Board v. Morris and Essex Railroad Co., 20 Id. 193; State Board v. Paterson, &c., Railroad Co., 21 Id. 446. … The judgment of the state board will be affirmed.

State v. Bradway

118 N.J.L. 17 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1937

Justice Yan Syckel in State v. Halsted, 39 N. J. … So also in State v. Brom, 78 Id. 222, in which the Halsted case was cited and followed, the late Mr.

Thanasoulis v. Winston Towers 200 Ass'n.

110 N.J. 650 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1988

In June 1981, the Board revised the parking charges. … N.J.S.A. 46:8B-4; see also Siller v.

Packard Bamberger Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Pharmacy

134 N.J.L. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1946

The Board of Pharmacy is vested with discretionary power in the granting of permits and under the law the judgment of the Board should not be set aside unless its action was discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious, in other … Zicherman v. Driscoll, 133 N. J. L. 586. As was said in Librizzi v.

Wanser v. Hoos

60 N.J.L. 482 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1897

In State v. … In Owens v. Furey the act established a municipal board of public works in certain cities. In Matheson v.