Case law

Greenan v. Braca

18 N.J. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 18, 1955

The chairman of the board, a Democratic member, announced at the board’s meeting of March 24 (the third meeting at which the. board tried unsuccessfully to resolve the deadlock) that he was advised that he had the authority … V, par. 3; R. R. 1:5-4, to retain the cause for the purpose of giving judicial superintendence to the completion of the proceedings upon the pending canvass.

State v. Short

131 N.J. 47 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1993

The commentary also acknowledges the case of State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405 , 126 A.2d 161 (1956). … State v. Brown, however, is distinguishable. It is important to understand that in Brown the lesser included offense was a form of murder, not manslaughter.

BD. OF ED. OF WEST ORANGE v. Wilton

57 N.J. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1971

NLRB v. Security Guard Service, Inc., 384 F. 2d 143 (5 Cir. 1967). … As we pointed out in Lullo v. International Ass’n of Fire Fighters, 55 N. J. 409 (1970) and in Burlington County Evergreen Park Mental Hospital v. Cooper, 56 N.

Weiner v. Borough of Stratford, County of Camden

15 N.J. 295 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 1954

He duly filed his application for a license with the planning board. The borough council denied the license upon the planning board’s recommendation. … Good Humor, Inc. v. Board of Com’rs of Borough of Bradley Beach, 124 N. J. L. 162 (E. & A. 1940); Sheffield Farms Co., Inc., v. Seaman, 114 N. J. L. 455 (Sup. Ct. 1935); cf. Family Finance Corp. v. Gaffney, 11 N.

Crystal Holding Co. v. Town of Westfield

7 N.J. Misc. 975 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929

It therefore appears to us that the decision of this court in Bellofatto v. Board of Adjustment of Montclair, 6 N. J. Mis. … The case is also controlled so far as this *977 court is concerned, by Kilay v. Quigley, 6 Id. 623, a case very similar to this in all essential features.

State v. Barry

86 N.J. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1981

Because I do not find these intervening events any more significant than the ones in Brown v. … By focusing on “the causal connection between the illegality and the confession,” Brown v.

Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Commission

71 N.J. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1976

See Slurzberg v. Bayonne, 39 N. J. 106, 114, 115 (1959); State v. Boncelet, 107 N. J. Super. 444, 450 (App. Div. 1969). … Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes, 28 N.

Gutt v. Venezia

12 N.J. Misc. 480 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1934

Appellant cites the eases of Newell v. Clark, 46 N. J. L. 363, and Van Horne v. Brown, 85 N. J. L. 544; 89 Atl. Rep. 994 , to sutsain her contention. These cases we think support the contrary view. Newell v. … Van Horne v. Brown, supra. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Allen v. Mayor of Jersey City

53 N.J.L. 522 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891

Justice *526 Bedle in his opinion in McGregor v. … Co. v. Jersey City, 18 Vroom 286 ; North Hudson County. R. R. Co. v. Hoboken, 12 Id. 71; Trenton Horse Car R. R. Co. v. Trenton, ante p. 132; S. C., 20 Atl. Rep. 1076 .

State v. McCoy

116 N.J. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 4, 1989

We recognized that “ ‘[possession signifies intentional control and dominion, the ability to affect physically and care for the item during a span of time.’ ” State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 597 (1979) (quoting State v. … See Brown, supra, 80 N.J. at 598-99 ; DiRienzo, supra, 53 N.J. at 376 ; cf. State v.

In Re City Affairs Committee of Jersey City

129 N.J.L. 589 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1943

This question was considered by the Local Government Board, sitting in review of Commissioner Darby’s approval of the budget. … Burl ington v. Martin, 129 N. J. L. 92; Sargeant Bros. v. Brancati, 107 Id. 84; In re Hudson County, 106 Id. 62, 75.

Greenspan v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control

12 N.J. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1953

We find no merit in the appellant’s contention that the decision of this court in New Jersey Bankers Assn. v. Van Riper, 1 N. J. 193 (1948), impliedly overrules that case. … Brush v. Hock, 137 N. J. L. 357, 361 (Sup. Ct. 1948). Eor the reasons expressed the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, is affirmed.

State v. Garrabrant

32 N.J.L. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1868

State v. Hardcastle, 2 Dutcher 143 ; State v. Hardcastle, 3 Dutcher 553; State v. Browning, 4 Dutcher 556. The eleventh section authorizes the raising of money by taxation, only for certain purposes. … Cited in State v. Greenleaf, Collector, 5 Vroom, 412 ; State v. Sullivan, Collector of Lebanon, 7 Vroom 90 ; State, Lamb, pros., v. Hurff, 9 Vroom 311 ; State, Slack, pros., v. Palmer, 10 Vroom 251 ; Paret v.

In re the Appeal of Blue Bird Dyeing Co.

7 N.J. Misc. 1049 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1929

We have examined the record and find evidence' to sustain the assessments as of October 1st, 1928, in the amounts found correct by the state board of taxes and assessment. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board, 103 N. J. L. 28; Gibbs v. State Board, 101 Id. 371. The judgment rendered by the state board of taxes and assessment is affirmed.

In re Interest of J.A.

233 N.J. 432 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 2018

State v. Brown , 216 N.J. 508 , 526, 83 A.3d 45 (2014). The home is the singular place where the privacy interests of people are most profound. Ibid. … The State bears the burden of proving attenuation. *280 Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590 , 604, 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975).

In Re Petition of Nj American Water Co.

169 N.J. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 2001

Co. v. Pub. Utils. … Co. v. Pub. Serv.

In Re Opinion No. 415, New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

81 N.J. 318 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1979

In State v. … Higgins v. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, 73 N.J. 123 (1977) (attorney: member of the board of chosen freeholders may not ethically represent a criminal defendant in the county the attorney holds office).

Young v. BD. OF HEALTH, BOR. OF SOMERVILLE

61 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 23, 1972

YOUNG, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE BOROUGH OF SOMERVILLE, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 7, 1972. Decided June 23, 1972. *77 Mr. James R. … Where a general rule or declaration of policy has already been made, its particular implementation by a board of health will normally take the form of a resolution. Courter v.

King v. Holbrook

58 N.J.L. 369 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

Brown v. Fitch, 4 Vroom 418 . That decision has been uniformly fol *371 lowed since. Lehman v. Hauk, 13 Id. 206 ; Marts v. Cumberland Insurance Co., 15 Id. 478 ; Smith v. Miller, 20 Id. 521 . … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Sims, Smith, Talman. 13. For reversal—Hono.

Riley v. Wortendyke

80 N.J.L. 663 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1910

In Feiner v. … In Morecraft v.