Case law

Brickett v. Lagay

134 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1946

Vide, Berdan v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, 82 N. J. … Vide, Van Cleve v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, supra.

State ex rel. Rexroth v. Ames

55 N.J.L. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893

Merrill v. Simpkins, 24 Vroom 582 . In that case, Mr. … State v. Saalman, 8 Vroom 156 .

Alpha Rho Alumni Ass'n v. City of New Brunswick

126 N.J.L. 233 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1941

In State v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 118 N. J. … Cen *239 tral Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N. J. L. 771; Secaucus v. Huber, 87 Id. 464; Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 91 Id. 76, 82; Camden v.

State v. Esteves

93 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1983

He was sentenced to a term of probation for three years and fined $100, payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. … State v. Brown, 160 N.J.Super. 227, 234 (Law Div.1978); accord State v. Wausnock, 303 A.2d 636, 637 (Del.Sup.Ct.1973); State v. Darling, 393 A.2d 530, 532-33 (Me.Sup.Jud.Ct.1978); Commonwealth v.

Ind. Elec. Assoc. of NJ v. NJ Bd. of Exam.

54 N.J. 466 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1969

KRAINSKI AND WILLIAM BOJKO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … The effect apparently was to embody in the act an exemption which the Board had previously recognized. Its validity has not been argued here. Cf. Sands v.

BD. OF EDUCATION OF JERSEY CITY v. Cuff

38 N.J. 430 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1962

Cummings Victoria De La Bastide Joseph Eerrino John Garland Mary Mara Winifred V. McLaughlin Erieda Nelson Ruth Neuland Charles Nichol Augusta E. Peeklers Mae Pfohl Jane V. … Stremick Martin Sutton The Board then appealed to the Appellate Division which, on November 30, 1961, filed a per curiam affirming the order of *432 the Department of Civil Service on the basis of Messano v.

Carson v. Scully

90 N.J.L. 295 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1917

State v. Davis, 72 N. J. L. 345, and cases cited; affirmed, 73 Id. 680. . See, also, Meehan v. Excise Commissioners, Id. 382, 388. … In Commonwealth v. Gouger, 21 Pa. Super.

Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison

72 N.J. 481 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1977

Brown, supra, 332 F. … Crow v. Brown, supra, 332 F. Supp. at 395 ; Dailey v. City of Lawton, supra, 296 F. Supp. at 269; Casey v. Warwick Tp.

Brady v. Department of Personnel

149 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 1997

Brotspies v. … Mathews v.

Zellers v. Delany

80 N.J.L. 452 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1910

In Burr v. … Steamship Company v. Ingebregsten, 28 Vroom 400 ; Smith v. Erie Railroad Co., 38 Id. 636; Hopwood v. Atha, &c., 39 Id. 707; Dunne v. Jersey City G. Co., 44 Id. 586; Reinhardt v. Central Lard Co., 45 Id. 9.

Wright v. Vogt

7 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1951

New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co., 113 N. J. L. 287 (Sup. Ct. 1934), modified and affirmed, 115 N. J. L. 495 (E. & A. 1935). … Compare Finnegan v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 131 N. J. L. 276 (Sup. Ct. 1944). The intention is taken or presumed according to what is consonant to reason and good discretion. Lynch v. City of Long Branch, 111 N. J.

Lehigh Navigation Coal Co. v. McGonnell

120 N.J.L. 428 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 23, 1938

He quit work at the usual time and proceeded to the railroad station in order to board a train to go to Camden on his way home. While attempting to board the train, he was struck by another train and killed. … True, it is, in this case, the injury did not happen while being transported but while in the act of boarding the train, but this, we think, is a difference without a legal distinction.” In Laverty v.

State v. Bedell

67 N.J.L. 148 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

It is objected on behalf of the respondents that, under the *150 decisions of this court in Steelman v. Vickers, 22 Vroom 180 , and Richman v. … Mitchell, v. Tolan, 4 Id. 195, 199 .

Bianchi v. Morey

124 N.J.L. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1940

Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J. L. 183; 147 Atl. Rep. 555 ), and now occupied by the Bloomfield Lumber Co. … Phillips v. Township Council, &c., Teaneck, 120 N. J. L. 45 (and cases therein cited, at p. 48); 198 Atl. Rep. 368 ; affirmed, 133 N. J. L. 485; 5 Atl. Rep. (3d) 698.

Waldron v. Davis

66 L.R.A. 591 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1904

.: • “(1) To board and care of said Eliza YanNorden, deceased, from October 1st, 1893, to October 1st, 1898, 260 weeks, at $4.25 per week=$l,105.00; (2) to board and care of Eliza YanNorden, deceased, from October 1st, 1898 … Hann, 10 Vroom 207 ; Hallett v. Oakes, 1 Cush. 296 ; Kendall v. May, 10 Allen 59 ; Richardson v. Strong, 13 Ired. 106 ; Pearl v. McDowell, 3 J. J. Marsh. 659; 1 Ad. Cont. (2d Am. ed.) 236. In the case of Richardson v.

Watson v. City of East Orange

175 N.J. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 2003

Petitioner appealed to the Merit System Board (Board), which in turn transmitted the matter as a contested case to an administrative law judge (ALJ). … See Golson-El v. Runyon, 812 F.Supp. 558, 561 (E.D.Pa.)

Weber v. Brandt

121 N.J.L. 600 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1939

After a careful examination of the testimony we conclude that the conclusions of Judge Brown on appeal were justified and ought not be disturbed. … L. 1931, ch. 279, p. 705; Pasquale v. Clyde Piece Dye Works, Inc., 120 N. J. L. 557 (at p. 560), and cases therein cited. Therefore the doctrine of res adjudícala does not apply. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

State v. Maristany

133 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1993

State v. … State v.

Matter of Alosio

99 N.J. 84 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1985

*85 ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that RUDOLPH V. … is hereby adopted; and it is further ORDERED that RUDOLPH V.

State ex rel. Cadmus v. Farr

47 N.J.L. 208 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885

Corp., § 216; 5 Dane’s Abr. 150; Rex v. Miller , 6 T. R. 268; Rex v. Bellringer, 4 T. R. 810; Rex v. Monday, Cowp. 530; Rex v. Varlo, Cowp. 250; Oldknow v. Wain-right, 1 W. Bl. 229; Gosling v. Veley, 7 Ad. & E (N. … .) *217 406 ; Ex parte Willcocks, 7 Cow. 401 ; Lockwood, v. Mech. Nat. Bank, 9 R. I. 308 ; Buell v. Buckingham, 16 Iowa 284 ; Columbia, &c., Co. v. Meier, 39 Mo. 53 ; Sargent v. Webster, 13 Metc. 497 ; First Parish v.