Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.65s

  • Shapiro v. Brennan

    3 N.J. Misc. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1925

    This case is very similar to Builders Realty Co. v. Bigelow, argued and decided at the present term. … The director denied a license and the board of adjustment concurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Esteves

    93 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1983

    He was sentenced to a term of probation for three years and fined $100, payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. … State v. Brown, 160 N.J.Super. 227, 234 (Law Div.1978); accord State v. Wausnock, 303 A.2d 636, 637 (Del.Sup.Ct.1973); State v. Darling, 393 A.2d 530, 532-33 (Me.Sup.Jud.Ct.1978); Commonwealth v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Axelrod v. Central Garden & Pet Co.

    178 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 25, 2003

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Potts

    120 N.J.L. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1938

    of the board, any attempt by the board to create an office for the term of five years is illegal and void, citing Trowbridge v. … In Haight v. Love, 39 N. J. L. 14 (relied on by the prosecutor) and in Erwin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Jayson

    94 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1920

    State v. Brown, 62 N. J. L. 666, 702; State v. Mellillo, supra. … State v. Brown, 62 N. J. L. 666.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bilt-Wel Co. v. Scott

    6 N.J. Misc. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

    The prosecutor then applied for and was allowed a writ of certiorari to review the determination of said board of adjustment. In the case of Koplin v. … This court will not disturb the action of a board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 4 Id. 515.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Mayor of Jersey City

    35 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1872

    State v. Jersey City, 2 Vroom 361 . There is a remaining question, whether the plan of Culver is such a plan as is meant by section fifty-nine. … Cited in Lower Chatham Drainage Case, post p. 509; State, Hoxsey, pros., v. Paterson, 10 Vr. 493 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thirteenth Ward Building & Loan Ass'n v. Weissberg

    115 N.J. Eq. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1934

    Fitzgerald v. State Mutual Building and Loan Association, 76 N. J. Eq. 137, 141. … Campbell, Receiver, v. Perth Amboy Loan, &c., Association, 67 N. J. Law 71.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fitch v. Smith

    57 N.J.L. 526 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

    , the office was held by an incumbent whose-term would not end until after the expiration of that board and the organization of a new board pursuant to the act of May 25th, 1894. … Such a choice could give the relator no title to the office, as the power of appointment belonged to the board which would be in existence when the office became vacant. Bownes v. Meehan, 16 Vroom 189 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Institute of Holy Angels v. Bender

    79 N.J.L. 34 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1909

    The argument is quite as clear in the case of the charge for tuition as in case of the charge for board. … We have no reason 'to doubt that a tract of five acres was necessary in the case of a boarding school like this. In Stevens Institute v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Booth v. Bd. of Adj., Rockaway Tp.

    50 N.J. 302 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 6, 1967

    Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., 24 N. J. 154, 177-178 (1957); Bergen County v. Port of N. Y. Authority, et al., 32 N. J. 303, 311, 318-319 (1960); Schultze v. Wilson, 54 N. J. Super. 309, 319 (App. … See Jantausch v. Borough of Verona, 24 N. J. 326, 334-335 (1957); Ward v. Scott, 16 N. J. 16, 23 (1954).

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • In Re the Municipal Election Held on May 10, 1994

    139 N.J. 553 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1995

    Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 , 626 A.2d 1073 (1993). … See Lemke v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McCran v. Gaul

    95 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 27, 1920

    See Erie Railroad Co. v. Board Public Utility Commissioners (1915), 87 N. J. L. 438. In Ross v. Freeholders of Essex (1903), 69 N. J. … as a board.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Matter of Skevin

    104 N.J. 476 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1986

    This case arises from a report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) that respondent be disbarred. … In re Brown, 102 N.J. 512 (1986). We do so here. The judgment is that respondent be disbarred. We further direct respondent to reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for costs.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In re Cleveland

    52 N.J.L. 188 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1889

    This conclusion is not at all opposed to the view taken in Paul v. Gloucester. As was lucidly shown in the opinion of Mr. … of the cities which accept it to appoint city comptrollers, treasurers and collectors,, ■three tax commissioners, a corporation counsel, a corporation attorney, three street and water commissioners, four members ■of the board

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • In Re Opinion 662 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

    133 N.J. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1993

    We emphasized, as we have emphasized before, that the appearance of impropriety must be “ ‘more than a fanciful possibility.’ ” Perillo v. … Advisory Comm. on Professional Ethics, 83 N.J. 366, 376 , 416 A.2d 801 (1980) (quoting Higgins v. Advisory Comm. on Professional Ethics, 73 N.J. 123, 129 , 373 A.2d 372 (1977)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fagen v. Morris

    83 N.J.L. 3 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1912

    In the case of McKenzie v. … Later, the Court of Errors and Appeals, in the case of Attorney-General v. McGuinness, 49 Id. 346, commenting upon this construction placed by us on the Civil Service law, declared that it met with its approval.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. Mayor of Jersey City

    63 N.J.L. 96 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

    The terms “ common council ” and “ board of aldermen ” in various acts relating to cities are used in the sense of “governing bodies.” … People v. Carrique, 2 Hill 93 ; Kerr v. Jones, 19 Ind. 351; Kelly v. Brooklyn, 77 N. Y. 503 ; State v. Allen, 21 Ind. 516 ; Stubbs v. Lee, 64. Me. 195; Magie v. Stoddard, 25 Conn. 565 ; State v. Goff, 9 Atl.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Roe

    36 N.J.L. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1872

    The act was designed to enable the board of assessors to remove, not arbitrarily to establish inequality, by permitting them to act in the premises without first having the sanction of their own judgment as a board, that … Cited in State, Inhabitants, &c., pros., v. Anderson, 9 Vr. 173 . Rev., p. 1155, § 71. Rev., p. 1155, § 72.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Rexroth v. Ames

    55 N.J.L. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893

    Merrill v. Simpkins, 24 Vroom 582 . In that case, Mr. … State v. Saalman, 8 Vroom 156 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.