Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.65s
3 N.J. Misc. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1925
This case is very similar to Builders Realty Co. v. Bigelow, argued and decided at the present term. … The director denied a license and the board of adjustment concurred.
Cited 0 timesPublished93 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1983
He was sentenced to a term of probation for three years and fined $100, payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. … State v. Brown, 160 N.J.Super. 227, 234 (Law Div.1978); accord State v. Wausnock, 303 A.2d 636, 637 (Del.Sup.Ct.1973); State v. Darling, 393 A.2d 530, 532-33 (Me.Sup.Jud.Ct.1978); Commonwealth v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedAxelrod v. Central Garden & Pet Co.
178 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 25, 2003
Cited 0 timesPublished120 N.J.L. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1938
of the board, any attempt by the board to create an office for the term of five years is illegal and void, citing Trowbridge v. … In Haight v. Love, 39 N. J. L. 14 (relied on by the prosecutor) and in Erwin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished94 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1920
State v. Brown, 62 N. J. L. 666, 702; State v. Mellillo, supra. … State v. Brown, 62 N. J. L. 666.
Cited 4 timesPublished6 N.J. Misc. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928
The prosecutor then applied for and was allowed a writ of certiorari to review the determination of said board of adjustment. In the case of Koplin v. … This court will not disturb the action of a board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 4 Id. 515.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1872
State v. Jersey City, 2 Vroom 361 . There is a remaining question, whether the plan of Culver is such a plan as is meant by section fifty-nine. … Cited in Lower Chatham Drainage Case, post p. 509; State, Hoxsey, pros., v. Paterson, 10 Vr. 493 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedThirteenth Ward Building & Loan Ass'n v. Weissberg
115 N.J. Eq. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1934
Fitzgerald v. State Mutual Building and Loan Association, 76 N. J. Eq. 137, 141. … Campbell, Receiver, v. Perth Amboy Loan, &c., Association, 67 N. J. Law 71.
Cited 7 timesPublished57 N.J.L. 526 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895
, the office was held by an incumbent whose-term would not end until after the expiration of that board and the organization of a new board pursuant to the act of May 25th, 1894. … Such a choice could give the relator no title to the office, as the power of appointment belonged to the board which would be in existence when the office became vacant. Bownes v. Meehan, 16 Vroom 189 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedInstitute of Holy Angels v. Bender
79 N.J.L. 34 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1909
The argument is quite as clear in the case of the charge for tuition as in case of the charge for board. … We have no reason 'to doubt that a tract of five acres was necessary in the case of a boarding school like this. In Stevens Institute v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBooth v. Bd. of Adj., Rockaway Tp.
50 N.J. 302 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 6, 1967
Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., 24 N. J. 154, 177-178 (1957); Bergen County v. Port of N. Y. Authority, et al., 32 N. J. 303, 311, 318-319 (1960); Schultze v. Wilson, 54 N. J. Super. 309, 319 (App. … See Jantausch v. Borough of Verona, 24 N. J. 326, 334-335 (1957); Ward v. Scott, 16 N. J. 16, 23 (1954).
Cited 42 timesPublishedIn Re the Municipal Election Held on May 10, 1994
139 N.J. 553 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1995
Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 , 626 A.2d 1073 (1993). … See Lemke v.
Cited 10 timesPublished95 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 27, 1920
See Erie Railroad Co. v. Board Public Utility Commissioners (1915), 87 N. J. L. 438. In Ross v. Freeholders of Essex (1903), 69 N. J. … as a board.”
Cited 8 timesPublished104 N.J. 476 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1986
This case arises from a report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) that respondent be disbarred. … In re Brown, 102 N.J. 512 (1986). We do so here. The judgment is that respondent be disbarred. We further direct respondent to reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for costs.
Cited 22 timesPublished52 N.J.L. 188 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1889
This conclusion is not at all opposed to the view taken in Paul v. Gloucester. As was lucidly shown in the opinion of Mr. … of the cities which accept it to appoint city comptrollers, treasurers and collectors,, ■three tax commissioners, a corporation counsel, a corporation attorney, three street and water commissioners, four members ■of the board
Cited 41 timesPublishedIn Re Opinion 662 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
133 N.J. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1993
We emphasized, as we have emphasized before, that the appearance of impropriety must be “ ‘more than a fanciful possibility.’ ” Perillo v. … Advisory Comm. on Professional Ethics, 83 N.J. 366, 376 , 416 A.2d 801 (1980) (quoting Higgins v. Advisory Comm. on Professional Ethics, 73 N.J. 123, 129 , 373 A.2d 372 (1977)).
Cited 4 timesPublished83 N.J.L. 3 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1912
In the case of McKenzie v. … Later, the Court of Errors and Appeals, in the case of Attorney-General v. McGuinness, 49 Id. 346, commenting upon this construction placed by us on the Civil Service law, declared that it met with its approval.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOliver v. Mayor of Jersey City
63 N.J.L. 96 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899
The terms “ common council ” and “ board of aldermen ” in various acts relating to cities are used in the sense of “governing bodies.” … People v. Carrique, 2 Hill 93 ; Kerr v. Jones, 19 Ind. 351; Kelly v. Brooklyn, 77 N. Y. 503 ; State v. Allen, 21 Ind. 516 ; Stubbs v. Lee, 64. Me. 195; Magie v. Stoddard, 25 Conn. 565 ; State v. Goff, 9 Atl.
Cited 16 timesPublished36 N.J.L. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1872
The act was designed to enable the board of assessors to remove, not arbitrarily to establish inequality, by permitting them to act in the premises without first having the sanction of their own judgment as a board, that … Cited in State, Inhabitants, &c., pros., v. Anderson, 9 Vr. 173 . Rev., p. 1155, § 71. Rev., p. 1155, § 72.
Cited 2 timesPublished55 N.J.L. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893
Merrill v. Simpkins, 24 Vroom 582 . In that case, Mr. … State v. Saalman, 8 Vroom 156 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna