Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.39s
Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Borough of Cresskill
1 N.J. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1949
Hamlett v. Snedeker, 246 App. Div. 758 , 283 N. Y. S. 906 (2d Dept. 1935;. … Without such provisions the ordinance would be void, -Somers v. Bradley Beach, 115 N. J. L. 135 (E. & A. 1935).
Cited 96 timesPublishedIn Re Police Sergeant (Pm3776v)
176 N.J. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 16, 2003
V. … V, § 6.
Cited 6 timesPublished119 N.J.L. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1937
The proceedings under the ordinance are under attack in Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of New ark, 119 N. J. L. 163. … With respect to this board, also, an ordinance was subsequently adopted and the appointments again made, and these proceedings are also under attack in Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 119 N. J. L. 163.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSchneidler v. City of Atlantic City
101 N.J.L. 32 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1925
by law upon such boards and bodies shall pass to, vest in and be performed by the board of commissioners "elected under the provisions of the act to which this act is supplemental.” * * * On the 17th day of April, 1924, … Paddock v. Hudson Tax Board, 82 N. J. L. 360; Colgarry v. Street Commissioners of Newark, 85 Id. 583; Runge v. West Hoboken, 88 Id. 301; Durkin v. Newark Fire Commissioners, 89 Id. 468.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBublitz v. Borough of Hillsdale
8 N.J. Misc. 334 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1930
L. 1918, p. 485), a temporary board was appointed for this particular assessment, on November 13th, 1928. A Mr. … Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 N. J. L. 200. The case of a special commissioner pro hac vice to make a particular assessment seems not to be within this class.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLevin v. Tp. Committee of Tp. of Bridgewater
57 N.J. 506 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 22, 1971
Lyons v. Camden, supra, 48 N. J. at 533-534. Defendants maintain that plaintiffs’ deliberate course of action before the Board should estop them from introducing evidence in the Law Division. … Berman v. Parker, supra, 348 U. S. at 33-34, 75 S. Ct. at 103 , 99 L. Ed. at 38 ; Wilson v. Long Branch, supra, 27 N. J. at 376; Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco v.
Cited 49 timesPublished215 N.J. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 2013
V. … See Cnty. of Morris v.
Cited 24 timesPublished163 N.J. 304 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 2000
According to the police, Detective Jay Brown informed defendant of his constitutional rights as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). … See State v.
Cited 185 timesPublishedSupreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 2015
McClintock v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTownship of Shrewsbury v. Merchants' Steamboat Co.
76 N.J.L. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908
Eatontown v. Monmouth Electric Co., 46 Vroom 459 . … The matter in controversy calls for no extended discussion, having been decided favorably to the prosecutor at the February term, 1908, of this court, in American Mail Steamship Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedProgress Improvement Co. v. Williams
7 N.J. Misc. 973 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929
previous board.” … apartment house by ordinance in effect before the passage of the constitutional amendment, and, by the statute passed after the constitutional amendment, the ordinance was continued in effect; and under our decision in Koplin v.
Cited 1 timesPublished44 N.J. Eq. 228 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1888
Hall v. Warren, 9 Ves. 605; Greenaway v. Adams, 12 Ves. 395; King v. Hamilton, 4 Pet. 311 ; 1 Story’s Eq. §§ 750, 751. … Gariss v. Gariss, 1 C. E. Gr. 79; Pinner v. Sharp, 8 C. E. Gr. 274; Locander v. Lounsbery, 9 C. E. Gr. 417; Plummer v. Keppler, 11 C. E. Gr. 481; Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 650; 1 Story’s Eq. § 742.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWilliam B. Riker & Son Co. v. United Drug Co.
79 N.J. Eq. 580 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1912
As was said by this court in Colgate v. United States Leather Co., 75 N. J. … Black v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Co., 24 N. J. Eq. (9 C. E. Gr.) 456, 463; Mills v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 41 N. J. Eq. (14 Stew.) 1; Colgate v. United States Leather Co., supra.
Cited 19 timesPublished91 N.J.L. 4 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1917
Pierson v. Cady, 84 N. J. L. 54. … In the case of Herman & Grace v.
Cited 1 timesPublished4 N.J. Misc. 711 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 10, 1926
Brown v. Ramsay, 29 N. J. L. 117; Berla v. Miesel, 52 Atl. Rep. 999 ; 29 Cyc. 1673. In the present case the facts were such as to make the question one to be determined by the jury.
Cited 6 timesPublished32 N.J.L. 70 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1866
Gilbert v. Burthenshaw, Cowper 230; Potts v. Imlay, 1 South. 338 ; Taylor v. Vanderveer, 4 Harr. 22 ; McConnell v. Hampton, 12 Johns. 234 . … Before Irwin left, a police officer came in with the young man, who had been sent by defendant to Brown & Osborn’s.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEdward C. Jones Co. v. Town of Guttenberg
66 N.J.L. 659 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1901
July 1st, 1878 (Jersey City v. O’Callaghan, supra; Cox v. … Stale v. Holliday, Overseer, 3 Halst. 205; Laird v. Abraham, 3 Gr. 22 ; In re Trenton Water Power Co., Spenc. 659. In State v.
Cited 9 timesPublished58 N.J.L. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895
The writ of certiorari was directed to these proceedings of the board. After referring to the case of Bradshaw v. City of Camden, Mr. … Rex v. Whitwell, 5 T. R. 84; Updegraff v. Crans, 47 Penna. St. 103; Haines v. Freeholders, 18 Vroom 454 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedRocker v. Cardinal Building & Loan Ass'n
13 N.J. Misc. 397 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1935
Brown v. Victor Building and Loan Association, 302 Id. 254; 153 Atl. Rep. 349 ; Stone v. New Schiller *410 Building and Loan Association, 302 Pa. 544 ; 153 Atl. Rep. 758 ; Publicker v. … It may also be noted that no legislature can curtail the power of its successors to make such laws as they deem proper in matters of police (Metro *412 politan Board of Excise v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 657 ; Boyd v.
Cited 10 timesPublished134 N.J.L. 604 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1946
Haase v. State, 53 N. J. L. 34; Minochian v. Paterson, 105 Id. 13; affirmed, 106 Id. 436. (2) The admission of Exhibit S-2, the oath of the members of the election board, is the next point relied upon. … State v. Monia, 132 N. J. L. 91; State v. Tulenko, 23 N. J. Mis. R. 249; affirmed, 133 N. J.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna