Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Little v. Dusenberry

    46 N.J.L. 614 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1884

    Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 ; Cooley v. Freeholders , 3 Dutcher 415; Livermore v. Freeholders, 5 Dutcher 245; S. C., 2 Vroom 507 ; Pray v. Jersey City, 3 Vroom 394 ; Marvin Safe Co. v. … For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Parker, Reed, Scudher, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 13. For reversal—None.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McDonough v. Roach

    35 N.J. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1961

    We recently canvassed the subject in Jones v. MacDonald, 33 N. J. 132 (1960). We there repeated from State ex. rel. Clawson v. Thompson, 20 N. J. L. 689 (Sup. … Defendant urges that every member of a county board must experience the same clash of interest by virtue of residence in one of its communities. Upon this basis he seeks to invoke Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Blake v. Flatley

    44 N.J. Eq. 228 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1888

    Hall v. Warren, 9 Ves. 605; Greenaway v. Adams, 12 Ves. 395; King v. Hamilton, 4 Pet. 311 ; 1 Story’s Eq. §§ 750, 751. … Gariss v. Gariss, 1 C. E. Gr. 79; Pinner v. Sharp, 8 C. E. Gr. 274; Locander v. Lounsbery, 9 C. E. Gr. 417; Plummer v. Keppler, 11 C. E. Gr. 481; Brown v. Brown, 6 Stew. Eq. 650; 1 Story’s Eq. § 742.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kean v. Union Water Co.

    52 N.J. Eq. 813 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

    In deciding the case of Owen v. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Magie,, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Sims, Smith — 8. For affirmance — Dixon, Bogert, Krueger — 3.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State, Lydecker v. Drainage & Water Commissioners

    41 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1879

    State, Baldwin, pros., v. Fuller, 10 Vroom 576; S. C., 11 Vroom 615 . … State, Gaines, pros., v. Hudson County Avenue Commissioners, 8 Vroom 12 ; State, McClosky, pros., v. Chamberlain, 8 Vroom 388 ; Coster v. Tidewater Co., 3 C. E. Green 54, 518.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jersey City Incinerator Authority v. Department of Public Utilities

    75 N.J. 600 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Julius Roehrs Co. v. DIV. OF TAX APPEALS, DEPT. OF TREASURY

    16 N.J. 493 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1954

    See Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church of the United States v. Neeld, 9 N. … I, par. 2; Schwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 129 N. J. L. 129 (Sup. Ct. 1942), affirmed 130 N. J.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Tulsa Oil Co. v. Morey

    137 N.J.L. 388 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 12, 1948

    Such ordinance is valid provided it establishes a sufficient norm or standard for the guidance of the board upon which the granting or refusal of a requested permit may depend. Phillips v. Belleville, 135 N. J. … L. 271; Finn v. Municipal Council of Clifton, 136 Id. 34. An adequate standard is provided here. Schnell v. Township Committee of Ocean, 120 Id. 194; First Church, &c., v. Board of Adjustment of Newark, 128 Id. 376.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Cannarella

    186 N.J. 63 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 2006

    member, school administrator, teacher, school bus driver, or other employee of a school board....” … The State’s reliance on State v. Ivory, 124 N.J. 582 , 592 A.2d 205 (1991), which interpreted N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7 to include private schools, is misplaced.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Greenfield v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners

    126 N.J.L. 171 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1941

    of Commerce and Navigation, the Board of Conservation and Development, the State Board of Education (including the commissioner), the Department of Health, the Board of Institutions and Agencies, the Board of Public Utility … Terrone v. Harrison, 87 Id. 541; Winne v. Cassale, 100 Id. 291.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Daly v. City of New Brunswick

    3 N.J. 397 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1950

    Ct. 1924), except where the appointment is made by the governing body as a board at its organization meeting, Seaman v. Sirollo, 105 N. J. L. 570 (E. & A. 1929). … Foley v. Orange, 91 N. J. L. 554 (E. & A. 1918).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Johnson

    215 N.J. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 2013

    V. … See Cnty. of Morris v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Switz v. Kingsley

    37 N.J. 566 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1962

    See Bucino v. Malone, 12 N. J. 330, 340 (1953); Schinck v. Board of Education, 60 N. J. Super. 448, 458 (App. Div. 1960). … J. 485 (1957); Ward v. Scott, 11 N. J. 117 (1952) ; Jamouneau v. Local Government Board, 6 N. J. 281, 287 (1951); Van Riper v. Traffic Tel. Workers Federation, 2 N. J. 335, 353 (1949).

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Singer v. State

    95 N.J. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 1984

    White, 594 F.2d 778 (10th Cir.1979); Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634 (8th Cir.1978); Fountila v. Carter, 571 F.2d 487 (9th Cir.1978), the criteria have been criticized as unduly cumbersome and “ponderous.” … Hughes v.

    Modified by Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984)Cited 98 timesPublished
  • State v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n

    59 N.J.L. 110 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

    By the eighth section of the act power was granted to such boards to make and ■enforce ordinances regulating the granting of licenses and fixing the fees to be paid therefor, and by the same section said boards were authorized … This was the view taken by this court in the case of State v. Zeigler, 3 Vroom 262 , and again in Melick v. Washington, 18 Id. 254. The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas should be reversed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pellecchia v. Mattia

    121 N.J.L. 21 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 11, 1938

    Pellecchia v. Mattia, 118 N. J. L. 512. He thereupon pursued his objective by writ of certiorari of which this is now the return. … If the appointment of a receiver was lawful, and this court held in Mattia v. Newark, supra, that it was, the conclusion seems inevitable.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frelinghuysen v. Town of Morristown

    76 N.J.L. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

    Millburn v. South Orange, 26 Vroom 254 (at p. 262). In Chicago Packing Co. v. … Roche v. Jersey City, 11 Vroom 257 ; De Ginther v. New Jersey Home, 29 Id. 354; Camden v. Varney, 34 Id. 325.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schneidler v. City of Atlantic City

    101 N.J.L. 32 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1925

    by law upon such boards and bodies shall pass to, vest in and be performed by the board of commissioners "elected under the provisions of the act to which this act is supplemental.” * * * On the 17th day of April, 1924, … Paddock v. Hudson Tax Board, 82 N. J. L. 360; Colgarry v. Street Commissioners of Newark, 85 Id. 583; Runge v. West Hoboken, 88 Id. 301; Durkin v. Newark Fire Commissioners, 89 Id. 468.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Shaffona Morgan (069967)

    217 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 2013

    State v. Brown, 275 N.J. Super. 329, 332 (App. Div. 1994). … Div. 2005); see also State v. Brown, 275 N.J. Super. 329, 331–32 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 138 N.J. 269 (1994).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Bublitz v. Borough of Hillsdale

    8 N.J. Misc. 334 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1930

    L. 1918, p. 485), a temporary board was appointed for this particular assessment, on November 13th, 1928. A Mr. … Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 N. J. L. 200. The case of a special commissioner pro hac vice to make a particular assessment seems not to be within this class.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.