Case law

State v. Village of South Orange

46 N.J.L. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1884

To justify such increase it must be adjudged by the board that the benefits conferred were proportionately greater than the board of assessments had found them to *320 be. … Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 ; Sutphin v. Elizabeth, 11 Vroom 283 . The report of the board of assessments conclusively shows that they failed to perform the duties thus required of them.

State ex rel. Benson v. Weiler

6 N.J. Misc. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1928

This is a contest under section 4 of the Quo Warranto act, and involves the alleged office of clerk to the board of assessors of the town of Kearny. … Harris v. Corker, 89 N. J.

Bd. of Health, Weehawken Tp. v. NY Central R. Co.

10 N.J. 294 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1952

Lines v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 5 N. J. 114, 123 (1950). The principal question on this appeal is whether or not the municipal court had jurisdiction to try the defendant on these complaints. … L. 123 (E. & A. 1921); Richardson v. State Board, 99 N. J. L. 516 (E. & A. 1923); Everingham v. Millville, 3 N. J. Misc. 293 (Sup. Ct. 1925), affirmed 101 N. J. L. 566 (E. & A. 1925); Wilentz v. Galvin, 125 N. J.

General Electric Co. v. City of Passaic

28 N.J. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1958

In City of Camden v. Camden County Board of Taxation, supra [121 N. J. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.

Vander Burgh v. County of Bergen

120 N.J.L. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1938

The gist of it is to be found in our opinion in Delmar v. Bergen County, 117 N. J. L. 377, and need not be repeated. … The question of waiver after the fee was earned was expressly reserved in the Kip case and in the later case of Weart v.

Kensington Realty Holding Corp. v. City of Jersey City

119 N.J.L. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

We have not overlooked the cases of North American Building and Loan Association v. New Brunswick, 117 N. J. L. 63; 186 Atl. Rep. 727 , and Schaible v. Board of Adjustment, Township of Millburn, 15 N. J. Mis. … In addition to the reason stated for the inapplicability of the holding in Freeman v. Hague, 106 N. J. L. 137; 147 Atl. Rep. 553 , we call attention to what was said in reference thereto in the case of Dickinson v.

National Bank v. Carpenter

52 N.J.L. 165 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1889

Brown v. Second National Bank of Erie, 72 Penna. St. 209; Huntermister v. First National Bank, 64 N. Y. 212 ; Lynch v. National Bank of West Virginia, 22 W. Va. 554 ; Pritchard v. Meekins, 98 N. … For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Magie, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith, Whitaker. 9.

In Re Reisdorf

80 N.J. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1979

See Skillman v. Lanehart, 73 N. J. Eq. 351, 353 (Prerog. 1907); also, Greene v. Raynolds, 133 N. J. Eq. 342, 343 (E. & A. 1943) (dictum); Perrine v. Applegate, supra, (dictum). … . & A. 1915) (setting aside fees based on contingency) with Hughes v. Eisner, supra; Grimm v. Franklin, 102 N. J. Eq. 198 (Ch. 1928); Soper v. Bilder, 87 N. J. Eq. 564 (Ch. 1917); Hassell v. Van Houten, 39 N. J.

Reuck v. McGregor

32 N.J.L. 70 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1866

Gilbert v. Burthenshaw, Cowper 230; Potts v. Imlay, 1 South. 338 ; Taylor v. Vanderveer, 4 Harr. 22 ; McConnell v. Hampton, 12 Johns. 234 . … Before Irwin left, a police officer came in with the young man, who had been sent by defendant to Brown & Osborn’s.

Levy v. Township of North Bergen

10 N.J. Misc. 850 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1932

Burlington v. Dennison, 42 N. J. L. 165. In this case the act is not required to be by ordinance. … State, Keeler v. Tindall, 36 N. J. L. 97.

Kessler v. Minard

134 N.J.L. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1946

, agents and employees as may be required for the execution of the powers conferred upon said board or any board or officer within the county " The italics ours. … See Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N. J. L. 349; affirmed, 130 Id. 528. The argument is made, in behalf of the defendants in certiorari, that the prosecutor had no legal employment.

Winne v. County of Bergen

21 N.J. 311 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 26, 1956

De Marco v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen, supra; Hart v. Borough of Hawthorne, supra; Strohmeyer v. … See De Marco v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen, supra.

Levin v. Tp. Committee of Tp. of Bridgewater

57 N.J. 506 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 22, 1971

Lyons v. Camden, supra, 48 N. J. at 533-534. Defendants maintain that plaintiffs’ deliberate course of action before the Board should estop them from introducing evidence in the Law Division. … Berman v. Parker, supra, 348 U. S. at 33-34, 75 S. Ct. at 103 , 99 L. Ed. at 38 ; Wilson v. Long Branch, supra, 27 N. J. at 376; Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco v.

Township of Landis v. Division of Tax Appeals of State Department of Taxation & Finance

137 N.J.L. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1948

In Township of Teaneck v. State Board of Tax Appeals the Supreme Court interpreted Jersey City v. … No reference was made to Township of Teaneck v. State Board of Tax Appeals.

State v. Laird

25 N.J. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1957

Ct. 1942); Brown v. Rice, 57 Me. 55 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1869); United States v. Benz, 282 U. S. 304 , 51 S. Ct. 113 , 75 L. Ed. 354 (1931). … Reference was made to Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172 , 20 S. Ct. 77 , 44 L.

Binder Realty Corp. v. City of Newark

19 N.J. Misc. 624 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 18, 1941

. *631 The learned Chief Justice held that the cases of Jersey City v. Riker, supra; Jersey City v. O’Callaghan (1879, Beasley, C. J.), 41 Id. 349, and Ocean Grove, &c., v. … In Arimex Copper Co. v. Board of Assessors (Supreme Court, 1903, Dixon, J.), 69 N. J. L. 121; 54 Atl.

Township of Shrewsbury v. Merchants' Steamboat Co.

76 N.J.L. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

Eatontown v. Monmouth Electric Co., 46 Vroom 459 . … The matter in controversy calls for no extended discussion, having been decided favorably to the prosecutor at the February term, 1908, of this court, in American Mail Steamship Co. v.

Johnson Service Co. v. American Employers' Insurance

113 N.J.L. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1934

Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. Aetna, &c., Co., 110 N. J. L. 592; John P. Callaghan, Inc., v. Continental Casualty Co., Ibid. 390. … Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. Aetna, &c., Co., supra.

Matter of Robinovitz

102 N.J. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1986

Co. v. Riefolo Const. Co. Inc., 81 N.J. 514, 523 , (1980). … Board.

Progress Improvement Co. v. Williams

7 N.J. Misc. 973 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929

previous board.” … apartment house by ordinance in effect before the passage of the constitutional amendment, and, by the statute passed after the constitutional amendment, the ordinance was continued in effect; and under our decision in Koplin v.