Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.91s
58 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1895
Central Railroad, Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; New Jersey Express Co. v. Nichols, 4 Vroom 434 ; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Id. 180; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … Matthews, 7 Id. 531; Delaware, Lackawanna and *193 Western Railroad Co. v. Toffey, 9 Id. 525; Smith v. Irwin, 22 Id. 507 ; Gaffney v. Brown, 150 Mass. 479 ; Beach Con. Negl., § 301.
Cited 2 timesPublished85 N.J.L. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1914
the de jure members of that board. … Hoffman v. Peters, 22 Vroom 244 ; Plainfield v. Watson, 28 Id. 525.
Cited 3 timesPublished134 N.J.L. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1946
, agents and employees as may be required for the execution of the powers conferred upon said board or any board or officer within the county " The italics ours. … See Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N. J. L. 349; affirmed, 130 Id. 528. The argument is made, in behalf of the defendants in certiorari, that the prosecutor had no legal employment.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHolster v. Bd. of Trustees of Passaic County College
59 N.J. 60 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 1971
[State by McLean v. Lanza, 27 N. … Most recently, in Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.
Cited 28 timesPublished224 N.J. 493 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 2016
ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-158, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20^1(f) (default by respondent) that KSENIA V. … its review of the matter that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to refund the $1,375.00 retainer to her client in the Franchetti matter; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that KSENIA V.
Cited 0 timesPublished57 N.J.L. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895
The position held by the plaintiff is the creature of the board of commissioners ; it is entirely unknown to the statute. … For this doctrine is cited the case of Chase v. Lowell, 7 Gray 33 , which, in all its essential facts, is identical with the case in hand. Let the rule be discharged.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPrudential Insurance Co. of America v. Division of Tax Appeals
133 N.J.L. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1945
The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals is presumptively correct and the burden is upon the party attacking it to overcome that presumption. Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. State Board, 126 N. J. … This court does not disturb the judgment of the State Board bn questions of fact unless the evidence is persuasive that the Board erred. Lawrence Township v. State Board, 124 Id. 465.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHudson County News Co. v. Sills
41 N.J. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 2, 1963
Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed. 2 d 1469 (1957); Times Film Corp. v. … C. v. Sugar Board of Puerto Rico, 235 F. 2 d 347, 351 (1 Cir. ), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 928 , 77 S.Ct. 225 , 1 L.Ed. 2 d 162 (1956); Kuhl Motor Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedNj Chapt., Am. Ip v. Nj St. Bd. of Prof. Planners
48 N.J. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1967
Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949).
Cited 25 timesPublishedSupreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 2024
Boyle was appointed to a seat on the Board. … Occhifinto v. Olivo Const. Co., LLC, 221 N.J. 443, 449 (2015) (quoting Walker v. Giuffre, 209 N.J. 124, 127 (2012)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMayor of Newark v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.
68 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902
Knight v. Freeholders, 20 Vroom 485 ; McLaughlin v. Newark, 28 Id. 298; S. C. on error, 29 Id. 202; Schwarzwaelder v. German Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 14 Dick. Ch. Rep. 589, 593. … Smart v. North Hudson County Railway Co., 37 *488 Vroom 156 , and eases cited; Intiso v. Metropolitan Saving and Loan Association, Id. 157. No error is shown, and the judgment of the board is affirmed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished40 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878
But we need not go elsewhere to look for authority, for in City of Hoboken v. … This principle was applied in Stagg v.
Cited 6 timesPublished63 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1899
Dugan v. Jersey City, 21 Vroom 359 ; Pierson v. Douglass, 4 Id. 363 ; Bayonne v. Kingsland, 12 Id. 368 . … Shields v. Paterson, 26 Vroom 495 ; Veghte v. Township of Bernard, 13 Id. 338. See, also, cases Jones v. Huston et al., 19 L. J. 280; Gabler v. Elizabeth. 13 Vroom 79 ; Water Commissioners v. Brewster, Id. 125.
Cited 7 timesPublished55 N.J.L. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893
The attention of the trial court should have been directed to the inquiry whether the defendant had waived the production of the final certificate (Byrne v. Sisters of St. … For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Krueger, Smith. 14.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcLean v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Coal Co.
13 N.J. Misc. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 16, 1935
(See Kenny v. Hudspeth, 59 N. J. L. 504, 529; 37 Atl. Rep. 67 ), and argued at the coming term of the Court of Errors and Appeals, if so ordered by that court. … Counsel draw the distinction that in the earlier case there was a certiorari and in this case an appeal to the cormty board and then to the state board.
Cited 2 timesPublished94 N.J. 331 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 1983
Boards of Education .... have, of course, important, delicate, and highly discretionary functions, but none that they may not perform within the limits of the Bill of Rights. … New Haven Community Schools, 529 F.Supp. 31 (E.D.Mich.1981); Bilbrey v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 26 (D.Or.1979); M. v. Ball-Chatham Community Unit School Dist.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWhitall-Tatum Co. v. Borough of Vineland
102 N.J.L. 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 24, 1925
Stat., p. 4059; Holt v. United Security Life Ins. Co., 76 N. J. L. 585; Fleming v. Reed, 77 Id. 563; Lewine v. Baltar, 97 Id. 231. … Camden v. Green, 54 N. J. L. 591; Koewing v. West Orange, 89 Id. 539; McCrory Stores Corp. v. Braunstein, 99 Id. 166; Schaedel v. Liberty Trust Co., Id. 380.
Cited 0 timesPublishedErie Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson
74 N.J.L. 738 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1907
In State v. … The same principle was involved in the case of Bownes v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDoremus v. Bd. of Education of Hawthorne
5 N.J. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1950
The Ohio case of Board of Education v. … Ring v. Board of Education, 245 Ill. 334 , 92 N. E. 251 (Illinois Sup.
Cited 16 timesPublished62 N.J.L. 216 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1898
Regina v. Drew, Regina v. Morton, Regina v. Furey and Regina v. … He said, ‘Well, I think, and many others on board the ship think, that Brown is the murderer; but I *234 don’t know anything about it.’ He was rather short in his replies.” The testimony of the witness was received.
Cited 41 timesPublished
Ask Donna