Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • Smith v. Van Sciver

    58 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1895

    Central Railroad, Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; New Jersey Express Co. v. Nichols, 4 Vroom 434 ; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Id. 180; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … Matthews, 7 Id. 531; Delaware, Lackawanna and *193 Western Railroad Co. v. Toffey, 9 Id. 525; Smith v. Irwin, 22 Id. 507 ; Gaffney v. Brown, 150 Mass. 479 ; Beach Con. Negl., § 301.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dunham v. Bright

    85 N.J.L. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1914

    the de jure members of that board. … Hoffman v. Peters, 22 Vroom 244 ; Plainfield v. Watson, 28 Id. 525.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kessler v. Minard

    134 N.J.L. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1946

    , agents and employees as may be required for the execution of the powers conferred upon said board or any board or officer within the county " The italics ours. … See Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N. J. L. 349; affirmed, 130 Id. 528. The argument is made, in behalf of the defendants in certiorari, that the prosecutor had no legal employment.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Holster v. Bd. of Trustees of Passaic County College

    59 N.J. 60 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 1971

    [State by McLean v. Lanza, 27 N. … Most recently, in Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • In re Proskurchenko

    224 N.J. 493 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 2016

    ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-158, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20^1(f) (default by respondent) that KSENIA V. … its review of the matter that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to refund the $1,375.00 retainer to her client in the Franchetti matter; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that KSENIA V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cramer v. Water Commissioners

    57 N.J.L. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

    The position held by the plaintiff is the creature of the board of commissioners ; it is entirely unknown to the statute. … For this doctrine is cited the case of Chase v. Lowell, 7 Gray 33 , which, in all its essential facts, is identical with the case in hand. Let the rule be discharged.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Division of Tax Appeals

    133 N.J.L. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1945

    The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals is presumptively correct and the burden is upon the party attacking it to overcome that presumption. Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. State Board, 126 N. J. … This court does not disturb the judgment of the State Board bn questions of fact unless the evidence is persuasive that the Board erred. Lawrence Township v. State Board, 124 Id. 465.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hudson County News Co. v. Sills

    41 N.J. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 2, 1963

    Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed. 2 d 1469 (1957); Times Film Corp. v. … C. v. Sugar Board of Puerto Rico, 235 F. 2 d 347, 351 (1 Cir. ), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 928 , 77 S.Ct. 225 , 1 L.Ed. 2 d 162 (1956); Kuhl Motor Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Nj Chapt., Am. Ip v. Nj St. Bd. of Prof. Planners

    48 N.J. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1967

    Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Patrick Boyle v. Carol Huff

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 2024

    Boyle was appointed to a seat on the Board. … Occhifinto v. Olivo Const. Co., LLC, 221 N.J. 443, 449 (2015) (quoting Walker v. Giuffre, 209 N.J. 124, 127 (2012)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayor of Newark v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

    68 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

    Knight v. Freeholders, 20 Vroom 485 ; McLaughlin v. Newark, 28 Id. 298; S. C. on error, 29 Id. 202; Schwarzwaelder v. German Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 14 Dick. Ch. Rep. 589, 593. … Smart v. North Hudson County Railway Co., 37 *488 Vroom 156 , and eases cited; Intiso v. Metropolitan Saving and Loan Association, Id. 157. No error is shown, and the judgment of the board is affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Love v. Mayor of Jersey City

    40 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878

    But we need not go elsewhere to look for authority, for in City of Hoboken v. … This principle was applied in Stagg v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Walton

    63 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1899

    Dugan v. Jersey City, 21 Vroom 359 ; Pierson v. Douglass, 4 Id. 363 ; Bayonne v. Kingsland, 12 Id. 368 . … Shields v. Paterson, 26 Vroom 495 ; Veghte v. Township of Bernard, 13 Id. 338. See, also, cases Jones v. Huston et al., 19 L. J. 280; Gabler v. Elizabeth. 13 Vroom 79 ; Water Commissioners v. Brewster, Id. 125.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mackinson v. Conlon

    55 N.J.L. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893

    The attention of the trial court should have been directed to the inquiry whether the defendant had waived the production of the final certificate (Byrne v. Sisters of St. … For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Krueger, Smith. 14.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McLean v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Coal Co.

    13 N.J. Misc. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 16, 1935

    (See Kenny v. Hudspeth, 59 N. J. L. 504, 529; 37 Atl. Rep. 67 ), and argued at the coming term of the Court of Errors and Appeals, if so ordered by that court. … Counsel draw the distinction that in the earlier case there was a certiorari and in this case an appeal to the cormty board and then to the state board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Engerud

    94 N.J. 331 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 1983

    Boards of Education .... have, of course, important, delicate, and highly discretionary functions, but none that they may not perform within the limits of the Bill of Rights. … New Haven Community Schools, 529 F.Supp. 31 (E.D.Mich.1981); Bilbrey v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 26 (D.Or.1979); M. v. Ball-Chatham Community Unit School Dist.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Whitall-Tatum Co. v. Borough of Vineland

    102 N.J.L. 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 24, 1925

    Stat., p. 4059; Holt v. United Security Life Ins. Co., 76 N. J. L. 585; Fleming v. Reed, 77 Id. 563; Lewine v. Baltar, 97 Id. 231. … Camden v. Green, 54 N. J. L. 591; Koewing v. West Orange, 89 Id. 539; McCrory Stores Corp. v. Braunstein, 99 Id. 166; Schaedel v. Liberty Trust Co., Id. 380.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Erie Railroad v. Mayor of Paterson

    74 N.J.L. 738 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1907

    In State v. … The same principle was involved in the case of Bownes v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doremus v. Bd. of Education of Hawthorne

    5 N.J. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1950

    The Ohio case of Board of Education v. … Ring v. Board of Education, 245 Ill. 334 , 92 N. E. 251 (Illinois Sup.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Roesel v. State

    62 N.J.L. 216 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1898

    Regina v. Drew, Regina v. Morton, Regina v. Furey and Regina v. … He said, ‘Well, I think, and many others on board the ship think, that Brown is the murderer; but I *234 don’t know anything about it.’ He was rather short in his replies.” The testimony of the witness was received.

    Cited 41 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.