Case law

Textile Research Institute v. Township of Princeton

35 N.J. 218 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

The board consists of 30 trustees plus *220 ex officio members, who are past presidents and past chairmen of the board continuing to be associated with active member companies. … The board of trustees elects from its membership a chief executive officer who becomes chairman of the board and who may also be president.

Hildreth Granite Co. v. Freeholders of Hudson

87 N.J. Eq. 316 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

Faxon v. Lovett, 60 N. J. Law 128; Low *319 v. Davy, 83 N. J. Law 542. But even if the evidence had justified a contrary conclusion, the appellant’s contention is without support. … Delaware and Hudson Canal Co. v. Mahlenbrock, 63 N. J. Law 281.

Madden v. State

57 N.J.L. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

State v. Young et al., 8 Vroom 184 . In Wood v. … The rule regulating this part of criminal pleading is that, while some overt act must' be shown ( Wood v.

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Division of Tax Appeals

133 N.J.L. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1945

The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals is presumptively correct and the burden is upon the party attacking it to overcome that presumption. Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. State Board, 126 N. J. … This court does not disturb the judgment of the State Board bn questions of fact unless the evidence is persuasive that the Board erred. Lawrence Township v. State Board, 124 Id. 465.

Calhoon v. Buhre

75 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1907

Katzin v. … All board to be billed at regular rates.

Hammer v. State

44 N.J.L. 667 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882

Const., art. 1 V., § 7, pi. 11. The object in adopting that provision, was to prevent particular legislative interference in the internal affairs of municipalities. … Rex v. Williams, 1 W. Bl. 93; Regina v. Blizzard, L. R., 2 Q. B. 55; People v. Loomis, 8 Wend. 396 ; Cole on Crim. Inf. 204; Rex v. Holt 2 Chit. 366. *672 The judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed. Dixon, J.

Kathleen DiFiore v. Tomo Pezic Dora Deleon v. the Achilles Foot and Ankle Group Jorge Remache-Robalino v. Nader Boulos, M.D.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 2023

Christina Vassiliou Harvey argued the cause for appellant Jorge Remache-Robalino (Lomurro, Munson, Comer, Brown & Schottland, attorneys; Jonathan H. … of Psychological Examiners (Board).

Schumacher v. City of Union City

9 N.J. Misc. 492 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1931

Construction Co. v. Scott (Court of Errors and Appeals), 104 N. J. L. 596, and attempts to differentiate Rohrs v. … This was not done and, therefore, that board did not have jurisdiction. 2. That there was no judgment by the board of adjustment as provided for by such statute.

von Nieda v. Bennett

13 N.J. Misc. 782 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 30, 1935

Mary Walsh Kobus, a member of the board of commissioners, as the director of public safety. At the organization of the board of commissioners as then constituted in May, 1935, Mr. … In considering the first resolution it is only necessary to say that in the case of Woolley v. Flock, 92 N. J. L. 65; 105 Atl.

Mayor of Newark v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

68 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

Knight v. Freeholders, 20 Vroom 485 ; McLaughlin v. Newark, 28 Id. 298; S. C. on error, 29 Id. 202; Schwarzwaelder v. German Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 14 Dick. Ch. Rep. 589, 593. … Smart v. North Hudson County Railway Co., 37 *488 Vroom 156 , and eases cited; Intiso v. Metropolitan Saving and Loan Association, Id. 157. No error is shown, and the judgment of the board is affirmed, with costs.

Davison v. Rake

45 N.J. Eq. 767 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889

The rule and the exceptions to it, are stated in Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 , and in Sullivan v. Winthrop, 1 Sumn. 1 -20, and by the surrogate, at the close.of his opinion, in Carr v. Bennett, 3 Dem. 433 . … Pl. 14 0—141—150; Dandridge v. Washington, 2 Pet. 370 -377; Brown v. Ricketts, 3 Johns. Ch. 553 -555; Read v. Patterson, 17 Stew. Eq. 211; Wainwright v. Waterman, 1 Ves. Jr. 311.

State ex rel. Benson v. Weiler

6 N.J. Misc. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1928

This is a contest under section 4 of the Quo Warranto act, and involves the alleged office of clerk to the board of assessors of the town of Kearny. … Harris v. Corker, 89 N. J.

Winne v. County of Bergen

21 N.J. 311 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 26, 1956

De Marco v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen, supra; Hart v. Borough of Hawthorne, supra; Strohmeyer v. … See De Marco v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen, supra.

Smith v. Van Sciver

58 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1895

Central Railroad, Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; New Jersey Express Co. v. Nichols, 4 Vroom 434 ; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Id. 180; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … Matthews, 7 Id. 531; Delaware, Lackawanna and *193 Western Railroad Co. v. Toffey, 9 Id. 525; Smith v. Irwin, 22 Id. 507 ; Gaffney v. Brown, 150 Mass. 479 ; Beach Con. Negl., § 301.

Dunham v. Bright

85 N.J.L. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1914

the de jure members of that board. … Hoffman v. Peters, 22 Vroom 244 ; Plainfield v. Watson, 28 Id. 525.

Kessler v. Minard

134 N.J.L. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1946

, agents and employees as may be required for the execution of the powers conferred upon said board or any board or officer within the county " The italics ours. … See Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N. J. L. 349; affirmed, 130 Id. 528. The argument is made, in behalf of the defendants in certiorari, that the prosecutor had no legal employment.

Meachem v. Common Council

73 N.J.L. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1905

State v. Wilmington, 3 Harr. (Del.) 294; 1 Dill. Mun. Corp. (4th ed.), § 203. … Ea st Orange v. Hussey, 41 Vroom 244 , and cases there cited.

Wilson v. Fromm

80 N.J.L. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 17, 1910

Ross v. Freeholders of Essex, 40 Vroom 291 ; Seymour v. Orange, 45 Id. 549; Fagan v. Payrie, 46 Id. 851. … Gildersleeve v. Board of Education, 17 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 201, 211; *586 Oregon v. Jennings, 119 U. S. 74, 90 ; People v. Palmer, 52 N. Y. 83 . The defendants are entitled to judgment upon the demurrer.

Strock v. Mayor of East Orange

80 N.J.L. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 5, 1910

In Strock v. … In Sherburne v. Portsmouth. 72 N.

Nj Chapt., Am. Ip v. Nj St. Bd. of Prof. Planners

48 N.J. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1967

Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545, 556 (1949).