Case law

Township of Deptford v. Woodbury Terrace Sewerage Corp.

54 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 15, 1969

See Whitehead v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 108 N. J. L. 258 (E. & A. 1931). … Co. v. Department of Public Utilities, Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 12 N. J. 568, 578-579 (1953).

In re the last will & testament of Wadskier

88 N.J. Eq. 589 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1918

W elsh v. Brown, 43 N. J. Law 37. This is the rule established in this state by a long line of authorities. … Bowne v. Ritler, 23 N. J. Eq. 459.

Matter of Vey

124 N.J. 534 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1991

In Craig v. … See State v.

Columbia-Bedford Corp. v. City of Jersey City

135 N.J.L. 208 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1947

In Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood, 77 N. J. … Jersey City v. Sun Holding Co., 134 Id. 119.

Bolos v. Trenton Fire Clay & Porcelain Co.

102 N.J.L. 479 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1926

Terlecki v. Strauss, 85 N. J. L. 454; affirmed, 86 Id. 708. It is argued that it was negligence on his part to jump on the running-board of the truck. … The test to be applied to determine whether or not an accident arose out of and in the course of employment has been stated in Bryant v. Fissell, 84 N. J.

In Re Infinito

94 N.J. 50 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1983

After hearing on the present *52 ment, the Disciplinary Review Board (Board) accepted the Committee’s findings that the respondent had violated DR 1— 102(A)(3) and (4). … ); In re Mirabelli, 79 N.J. 597, 602 (1979); In re La Duca, 62 N.J. 133, 136 (1973); In re Mischlich, 60 N.J. 590, 592-93 (1972); In re Isserman, 9 N.J. 269, 277-78 , reh. den., 9 N.J. 316 (1952), cert. denied, Isserman v.

State v. Authorized Foreign Car Specialists of Westfield, Inc.

118 N.J. 231 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 5, 1989

Board's Investigation of Telephone Companies v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

66 N.J. 476 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 10, 1975

This Court in State v. N. J. Bell Tel. … [State v. N. J. Bell Tel. Co., 30 N.

State v. Town of Guttenberg

62 N.J.L. 605 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1898

Van Riper v. Parsons, supra; Lowthorp v. Trenton, 32 Vroom 484, 487 ; Long Branch v. Dobbins, supra. … People v. Board of Supervisors, 38 N. W. Rep. 639 .

Mayor of Newark v. Fordyce

88 N.J.L. 440 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 1916

The prosecutors of this writ of certio7-ari are the city of Newark and its board of fire commissioners. … Watson v. Medical Society, 38 N. J. L. 377; Drake v. Plume, 44 Id. 362; Livingston v. Trinity Church, 45 Id. 230.

McCran v. Gaul

96 N.J.L. 165 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1921

It is not a necessary link in the chain of reasoning upon which the court’s conclusion is rested, and it would seem to be out of harmony with our own declaration in tire case of State v. Jefferson, 90 N. J. L. 507. … into the conduct of the affairs of the board.

Urban v. Taylor

14 N.J. Misc. 887 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 24, 1936

The facts and circumstances in this case seem on all fours with Sheffield Farms, Inc., v. Seaman, 114 N. J. L. 455; 177 Atl. Rep. 372 . … This statute cannot be construed as in any way affecting the decisions of this court in Sheffield Farms, Inc., v. Seaman, supra.

Schmidt v. Mayor & Council of Borough of Carlstadt

132 N.J.L. 18 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 13, 1944

Burdett v. Municipal Employees of Newark, 129 N. J. L. 70. As stated, Elsie Marc was legally appointed by the board temporarily on January 26th, 1944. *21 There seems to be no authority for more than one director. … Morgan v. Mayor and Council of Roselle Park, 129 N. J. L. 233; Laidlaw v. Board of Commissioners of Town of West Orange, 122 Id. 133.

Bd. Ed., Cent'l Reg'l High School Dist. of Ocean Cty. v. State Bd. Ed.

27 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1958

27 N.J. 76 (1958) 141 A.2d 542 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CENTRAL REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF OCEAN COUNTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … Compare Board of Education v. Atwood, 73 N.J.L. 315 ( Sup. Ct. 1906), affirmed 74 N.J.L. 638 ( E. & A. 1907), with Board of Education of West Amwell v. State Bd Ed. of N.J., 5 N.J. Misc. 152 ( Sup. Ct. 1927).

McArt v. Town of Belleville

97 N.J.L. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1922

The power of the board was questioned on certiorari in the case of Cooper et al. v. … This seems to be the fair implication from such cases as Foley v. Orange, 91 N. J. L. 554; Crane v. Jersey City, 90 Id. 109; affirmed, 92 Id. 248; Apple v. Atlantic City, 104 Atl. Rep. 89 ; Hewson v. Newark, 95 Id. 28.

Fair Share Housing Center, Inc. v. New Jersey State League of Municipalities

207 N.J. 489 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 23, 2011

or regional planning board. … N.A.A.C.P. v.

Waszen v. City of Atlantic City

1 N.J. 272 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1949

Schwitzer v. Board of Education, supra; McGovern v. Trenton, supra; West Essex B. & L. Asso. v. Caldwell, 112 N. J. L. 466 at 468 (Sup. Ct. 1934), Travis v. Highlands, 136 Id. 199, 201 (Sup. Ct. 1947). … Tice v. Long Branch 98 N. J. L. 214 (E. & A. 1922); Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor Twp., 135 N. J. L. 299 (E. & A. 1947).

Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of Franklin

233 N.J. 127 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2017

Martell v. Lane

22 N.J. 110 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1956

The first basic element is an upright, stationary board, circular in shape, called the “number board,” divided into 54 sections. There is a separate light bulb in each section, at the outer edge of the board. … See Lucky Calendar Co. v. Cohen, 19 N. J. 399 (1955). There is no need now to consider the judgment in Harris v. Hock.

State ex rel. Weinberger v. Hilfman

8 N.J. Misc. 32 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 30, 1929

Davis v. Davis, 57 N. J. L. 82; Manahan v. Watts, 64 Id. 468; Brodman v. Rade, 101 Id. 207. … State v. Jersey City, 25 N. J. L. 536 (at p. 544). No authority is given by the statute either to the board of commissioners or to any director for the suspension of any officer or employe.