Case law

Morris v. Fagan

85 N.J.L. 617 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1914

Pursuant to the authority conferred by this latter provision the newly elected board of commissioners appointed the respondent, Michael I. … Mitchell v. Tolan. 4 Vroom 201 ; Bownes v. Meehan, 16 Id. 192; Dugan v. Farrier, 18 Id. 387; Steelman v. Vickers, 22 Id. 180.

Central Railroad v. Baird

75 N.J.L. 771 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 7, 1908

The judgments in the cases of the Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, the Morris and Essex Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, the Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. *788 v. … State Board of Assessors, the Bergen County Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, and the Long Dock Co. v.

In Re Stern

81 N.J. 297 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1979

The Board’s Decision and Recommendation reads as follows: This matter is before the Board based upon two presentments filed by the District Ethics Committee for the Counties of Burlington and Ocean. … This trial calendar was, in reality, an altered copy of a prior court calendar in which respondent blanked out one of the court cases and inserted the nonexistent case of Heffernan v.

Simon v. Graham Bakery

17 N.J. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1955

Ct. 1953); Green Mountain Mushroom Co. v. Brown, supra, 117 Vt. 509 , 95 A. 2d 679, 681 ; Tremeroli v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co., 102 Cal. App. 2d 464 , 227 P. 2d 923, 930 (D. Ct. App. 1951). … In Brown v. Nevins, 84 N. J. L. 215 (Sup.

State v. Laws

50 N.J. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1967

See State v. Brown, 46 N. J. 96, 107 (1965). … S. 2A:4-39; State v. De Paola, 5 N. J. 1, 18 (1950); State v. Wolak, 26 N. J. 464 (1958); see Thomas v. United States, 74 App. D. C. 167, 121 F. 2d 905, 907-908 (1941); Brown v. United States, 119 U. S.

Coward v. Mayor of Bayonne

67 N.J.L. 470 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

Grant v. Clark, 9 Vroom 102 ; Hoboken Land and Improvement Co. v. Hoboken, 7 Id. 291; Wilkinson v. Trenton, 7 Id. 499; Bowne v. Logan, 14 Id. 421; Provident Institution v. Jersey City, 23 Id. 490. … Ryan v. Paterson, 37 Vroom 533 ; Oakley v. Atlantic City, 34 Id. 127; Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 29 Id. 262. The proceedings of the common council and the board of education should be affirmed, with costs.

State v. New Jersey Jockey Club

63 N.J.L. 515 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1899

, it would seem that he may seek relief from an excessive assessment by applying either to the local board of tax review or directly to the state board of taxation, as he may elect. … If there was such evidence then the determination of the board cannot be disturbed even though the evidence would not have led us to the same conclusion. Wilson v. City of Hudson, 3 Vroom 365 ; South Brunswick v.

Mattia v. City of Newark

119 N.J.L. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 8, 1938

It was said in Sykes v. Heinzman, 100 N. J. … State, Hart v. Schoonmaker, 14 N. J. Mis. R. 173; affirmed, 117 N. J. L. 151.

State Ex Rel. Wass v. Impellezeri

122 N.J.L. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1939

Campbell v. Hackensack, 115 N. J. L. 209. … In the circumstances the writ — Wass et al. v. Impellezeri et al. — will be dismissed with costs. The moving party is permitted to apply for certiorari. There is a second information presented by George Ptaszkowski v.

Feinberg v. STATE, DEP

137 N.J. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 3, 1994

Lieberman v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 132 N.J. 76, 79 , 622 A.2d 1295 (1993). … Murray v.

Stephany v. Liberty Out Glass Works

76 N.J.L. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

be subject to removal by resolution of the board at any time for cause, provided ■two-thirds of the whole board shall vote in favor thereof.” … The question does not arise as to the effect of the refusal of one of the members to vote (Mowrey v.

Gross v. Hague

99 N.J.L. 457 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1924

Terhune v. City of Passaic, 41 N. J. L. 90. … Jersey City v. Vreeland, 43 Id. 638.

Lehrhaupt v. Flynn

75 N.J. 459 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 8, 1978

KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ATTORNEY FOR THE MADISON TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, LINDA CHORORUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CLASS IV MEMBER OF THE MADISON TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, JEAN R. … MONIFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CLASS IV MEMBER OF THE MADISON TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, AND RICHARD F. ZIPP, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CLASS IV MEMBER OF THE MADISON TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v.

Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey City

55 N.J. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1969

See Dvorhin v. Dover Tp., 29 N. J. 303, 313-315 (1959); Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Furman, 41 N. J. 467, 477 (1964); cf. State v. Provenzano, 34 N. J. 318, 322 (1961); New Capitol Bar & Grill Corp. v. … It is significant that the plaintiffs did not tender any evidence before either the Planning Board or the Law Division to rebut the defendants’ showing (cf. Lyons v. City of Camden, supra, 48 N.

State ex rel. Renner v. Holmes

68 N.J.L. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

In support of this contention the decisions in De Hart v. Atlantic City, 34 Vroom 223 ; Christie v. Bayonne, 35 Id. 191, and Ross v. Passaic City, Id. 488, are cited. … In these decisions, as well as in several others (Pierson v. O’Connor, 25 Vroom 36 ; Stahl v. Trenton, Id. 444; Bennett v.

Gunne v. City of Newark

116 N.J.L. 339 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1936

R. 246; Hoboken Land and Improvement Co. v. Hoboken, 36 N. J. L. 291, and Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 Id. 200, are cited in support. … v.

Kingsley v. Division of Tax Appeals

40 N.J. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1963

Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, 35 N. J. 299 (1961). … A. 18:10-29.33, *342 and (when and if adopted by the county tax board) for distribution of the county tax burden among the municipalities. See Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, supra (35 N. J., at p. 303).

Vail v. Inhabitants of the City of Plainfield

9 N.J. Misc. 817 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1931

Flower Hill Cemetery v. North Bergen, 68 N. J. L. 488; Fairview Heights Cemetery Co. v. Fay, 90 Id. 427. … L. 1925, p. 231; MacEvoy v. Bergenfield, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 211.

Smith v. Borough of Florham Park

3 N.J. Misc. 355 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1925

Hershoff v. Beverly, 45 N. J. L. 288; Loertscher v. … This is in direct violation of Haake v. Norwood Borough, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 1046, and, therefore, nullifies and makes illegal the proceedings upon the passage and adoption of the ordinance.

Gabrielson v. Borough of Glen Ridge

13 N.J. Misc. 142 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1935

In Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J. L. 183; 147 Atl. Rep. 555 , it was said, in discussing State (Ignaciunas) v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; 125 Atl. … Provident Institution for Savings v. Castles, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 773; 168 Atl. Rep. 169 .