Case law

State v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

55 N.J. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1970

Super. 408), or a railroad freight yard (New York Central Railroad Co. v. Ridgefield, 84 N. J. Super. 85 (App. Div. 1964)). … Co. v. Montvale, 104 N. J. L. 480 (Sup. Ct. 1928), and In re Public Service Elec. & Gas Co., supra (35 R. J. at 370-373).

In re Haynes

54 N.J.L. 6 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

That title was as follows, viz.-' “An act concerning cities of the first class in this state, and constituting municipal boards of street and water commissioners, and defining the powers and duties of such municipal boards … That this unreasonable operation is not to be permitted to this constitutional prohibition, in view of its obvious purpose, was recently adjudged by the Supreme Court in the case of Campbell v.

Barila v. Bd. of Educ. of Cliffside Park

236 N.J. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 2019

Delaware, Lackawanna and Western RR Co. v. Neeld

23 N.J. 561 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1957

Ed. 265 (1931); Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision, 284 U. S. 23 , 52 S. Ct. 48 , 76 L. Ed. 146 (1931). … See Gibraltar Corrugated Paper Co. v. North Bergen Township, supra; City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. J. 371 (1955); Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, *575 supra.

Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Village of Ridgewood

6 N.J. Misc. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1928

L. 50; Schmeidler v. Atlantic City, 4 N. J. Adv. R. 983. … Abrams v. Smith, 98 N. J. L. 319, 320 ; McDonald v. Freeholders, Ibid. 388. Eor present purposes, we consider that by virtue of the amendment of 1925 a valid board of health was set up.

Titus v. Lindberg

49 N.J. 66 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1967

Board of Education, supra, 18 A. D. 2d 930, 238 N. Y. S. 2d 547; Selleck v. Board of Education, supra, 276 App. Div. 263 , 94 N. Y. S. 2d 318; Ziegler v. Santa Cruz City High School District, 168 Cal. … The Board, placing some reliance on the vestiges of New Jersey’s doctrine of “active wrongdoing” (see Meyer v. Board of Education, 9 N. J. 46 (1952); cf. Hayden v. Curley, 34 N. J. 420 (1961); McAndrew v.

Baker v. Stratton

52 N.J.L. 277 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1890

Broadwood v. Granara, 10 Exch. 417. Some variations of the rule are also made by the construction put upon statutes, as in Wyckoff v. Southern Hotel Co., 24 Mo. App. 382 ; Alvord v. … Davenport, 43 Vt. 30 ; Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. Walters, 50 Ga. 573; Bayley v. Merrill, 10 Allen (Mass.) 360, but in these cases the usual common law liability to the lien is recognized. In White v.

Franklin Tp. v. BD. OF ED. N. HUNTERDON REG. HIGH SCH.

74 N.J. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1977

See White v. … In Jackman v.

County of Bergen v. Civil Service Commission

137 N.J.L. 688 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

Dzerk for the probationary period, relying upon the decisions of that court in Civil Service Commission v. Rife, 128 N. J. L. 503, and Morgan v. Civil Service Commission, 131 Id. 410. … The 1938 statute was under scrutiny in Civil Service Commission v. Rife and Morgan v. Civil Service Commission, supra. R.

Western Electric Co. v. Hussey

35 N.J. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

In this unemployment compensation case the employer appealed to the Appellate Division from an adverse determination of the Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor and Industry, and we certified … The Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor and Industry rendered the following decision: “The employer filed a timely appeal from a decision of an appeal tribunal (ATJ-12891-Inv.) which held

NCP Litigation Trust v. KPMG LLP

187 N.J. 353 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 2006

One year later, in Schacht v. … See Allard v.

Love v. Mayor of Jersey City

40 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878

But we need not go elsewhere to look for authority, for in City of Hoboken v. … This principle was applied in Stagg v.

Colton v. Kreutzinger

116 N.J.L. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1936

Further, the relator relies upon a line of cases headed by Barr v. Geldziler, 108 N. J. L. 397, and Gardner v. Brevis, 95 Id. 21, among which is also Fort v. … Manahan v. Watts, 64 N. J. L. 465, 470; Bonynge v. Frank, 89 Id. 239.

W. A. Manda, Inc. v. City of Orange

82 N.J.L. 686 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1912

Laing v. United New Jersey Railroad, 25 Vroom 576 . This principle is recognized in Brown v. New Jersey Short Line Railroad Co., 47 Id. 795. … It was so held in this court in Brown v. N. J. Short Line Railroad Co., supra.

State v. Inhabitants of Trenton

55 N.J.L. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

The same condition of the record appeared in the case of Vreeland v. … The application of the clause in the charter to the present condition of facts, does not encounter the objection which defeated its application in the case of State, Winans et al, pros., v.

Bergen Ridge Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Twp. of N. Bergen Planning Bd.

236 N.J. 471 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2019

Crescent Hill, Inc. v. Borough of Allendale

118 N.J.L. 302 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1937

Under it the board of adjustment is empowered, “to recommend in writing to the governing board or board of public works, upon appeal in specific cases, that a structure or use be allowed in a district restricted against such … Payne v. Seabright, 14 N. J. Mis. R. 756; compare Conaway v. Atlantic City, 107 N. J. L. 404, 407.

Wolff v. Meyer

75 N.J.L. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1907

In Brown v. Honniss, 41 Vroom 260 , the plaintiff sought to recover damages for breach of a contract to convey land. … If the rule of Brown v. Honniss is applicable, Levinson’s testimony was admissible.

In Re the Estate of Jackson

79 N.J. 517 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 11, 1979

Bd. v. Dept. of Inst. & Agencies, 75 N. J. 232 (1978). … This contention was considered and rejected in Francis v. Harris, supra. Other courts have reached the same conclusion. See Langs v. Harder, 165 Conn. 490 , 338 A. 2d 458 (1973), cert. den. 416 U. S. 994 , 94 S.

O'Neill v. City of Bayonne

1 N.J. Misc. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1923

The case of Magner v. Yore was properly a quo warranto because the relator had been actually ousted. … The case of Loper v. Millville, 53 Id. 362, is relied on for defendants, but we think that case is not in point; and assuming, for present purposes, that it is, the later case of Magner v.