Case law

Anderson v. Myers

77 N.J.L. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

The remark of the late Justice Lippincott, in Manahan v. … So it was held by this court in cases where the relator claiming the office had failed himself to qualify by taking the oath (Hayter v. Benner, supra; Manahan v.

Godfrey v. McGann

37 N.J. 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1962

S. 2A:7-13, 2A:166-10, and 2A:169-9; see also City of Passaic v. Passaic County, 54 N. J. Super. 254 (App. Div. 1959). … See Pierson v. O’Connor, 54 N. J. L. 36 (Sup. Ct. 1891). Since employees of the Probation Department are appointed by the chief probation officer, N. J.

Baker v. Stratton

52 N.J.L. 277 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1890

Broadwood v. Granara, 10 Exch. 417. Some variations of the rule are also made by the construction put upon statutes, as in Wyckoff v. Southern Hotel Co., 24 Mo. App. 382 ; Alvord v. … Davenport, 43 Vt. 30 ; Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. Walters, 50 Ga. 573; Bayley v. Merrill, 10 Allen (Mass.) 360, but in these cases the usual common law liability to the lien is recognized. In White v.

Sykes v. Heinzman

100 N.J.L. 12 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1924

was amended so as to include judicial powers among those to be distributed among the various departments; and, in construing the scope -of the effect of this amendment the Court of Errors and Appeals, in the case of Foley v. … This power, therefore, was either transferred to the new board of commissioners by the provision of section 4 of the statute above set out or it did not pass to the board at all.

Nolan v. Witkowski

32 N.J. 426 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 23, 1960

Pesin v. Witkowski 31 N. J. 73 (1959). … S. 40:72-2 that authority passed to the governing body, i. e., the board of commissioners, of a city (such as Jersey City) operating under the Walsh Act. Connors v. City of Bayonne, 36 N. J. Super. 390 (App.

Hayes v. Mobius

96 N.J.L. 88 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1921

statute otherwise provides appointments made by the board without any definite term being fixed, will, under the cases of Burgan v. … L. 219, and Young v. Stafford, 86 Id. 422 (affirmed by the Court of Errors and Appeals in 87 Id. *90 726), be held: to- be for the term of the board making the appointment.

Tracy v. Tracy

62 N.J. Eq. 807 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1901

In McGean v. … Lomer v. Meeker, 25 N. Y. 361 ; Seibert v. Erie Railroad Co., 49 Barb. 583 .

Guerrero v. Burlington County Memorial Hospital

70 N.J. 344 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1976

Amado V. … J. 368 (1967); Quinlan v. Board of Education, 73 N. J. Super. 40, 46-47 (App. Div. 1962); Tullo v. Township of Millburn, 54 N. J. Super. 483, 498 (App. Div. 1959).

First Camden National Bank & Trust Co. v. Collins

114 N.J. Eq. 59 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1933

Graves v. Graves, 94 N. J. … Cruikshank v. Home for Friendless, 113 N. Y. 337 .

City of Jersey City v. Department of Civil Service

7 N.J. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1951

Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N. J. 99, 108 (1950). And that under R. 8. 40:46-23, supra, salary ranges must in the first instance be fixed by ordinance. Howard v. … Handlon v. Town of Belleville, supra, at p. 109; Van Brookhoven v. Kennedy, supra, at p. 182; Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380 (Sup. Ct. 1938). II The effect of P. L. 1936, c. 6.

Crue v. Caldwell

52 N.J.L. 215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1889

Montclair v. Dana, 107 U. S. 162 ; Central R. R. Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824, 830; Ayerigg v. New York and Erie R. R. Co., 1 Vroom 460 ; Baldwin v. Shannon, 14 Id. 596, 602 ; Nuendorf v. World Mutual Insurance Co., 69 N. … Baldwin v. Shannon, 14 Vroom 596 , 602; Denny v. Williams, 5 Allen 1 , 5; Brooks v. Somerville, 106 Mass. 271, 275 .

Herten v. State

99 N.J. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1984

Vreeland v. Mayor of Bayonne

54 N.J.L. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1892

Justice Dalrimple, delivering the opinion of the court, says ( 6 Vroom, 476 ): “In the cases of The State v. Jersey City, 1 Dutch. 313, and The State v. … To the same effect are Little v. Newark, 7 Vroom 170 , and Ryerson v. Passaic, 9 Id. 171.

Crescent Hill, Inc. v. Borough of Allendale

118 N.J.L. 302 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1937

Under it the board of adjustment is empowered, “to recommend in writing to the governing board or board of public works, upon appeal in specific cases, that a structure or use be allowed in a district restricted against such … Payne v. Seabright, 14 N. J. Mis. R. 756; compare Conaway v. Atlantic City, 107 N. J. L. 404, 407.

State ex rel. Walker v. Maas

4 N.J. Misc. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1926

Anderson v. Myers, 77 N. J. L. 186. The action of the board of directors is sought to be justified, and the prayer of the petition is resisted on the following grounds: 1. … The Court of Errors and Appeals has definitely established the law to the contrary in an opinion by the present Chief Justice in Schilstra v. Van Heuvel, 82 N. J.

Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals in State Department of Taxation & Finance

137 N.J.L. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1948

Hackensach Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 129 N. J. L. 535; affirmed, 130 Id. 483. … United New Jersey Railroad, *601 &c., Co. v. State Board, 101 N. J. L. 303.

Glover v. Simmons Co.

17 N.J. 313 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1955

Valenti v. Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Comm., 4 N. J. 287 (1950); In re Roche’s Estate, 16 N. J. 579 (1954). In W. T. Grant Co. v. Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Commission, 129 N. J. … J. 177 (1948); Valenti v. Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Comm., supra, 4 N. J. p. 292; cf. Ludwigsen v. New Jersey Department of Labor and Industry, 12 N. J. 64 (1953); Krauss v. A. & M.

Fleming v. Connecticut General Insurance

116 N.J.L. 6 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 9, 1935

Trapnell v. Hines, 268 Fed. Rep. 504; Fels v. East St. Louis and S. Railway, 275 Id. 881; Palmer v. Willamette Valley Southern Railroad Co., 88 Or. 322 ; 171 Pac. Rep. 1169 ; Chaffee v. Old Colony Railroad Co., 17 R. … the train,” citing Wharton v.

Hourigan v. Township of North Bergen

113 N.J.L. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1934

Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311 ; Tennessee v. Sneed, 96 U. S. 74 ; 24 L. … Farrell v. State, 54 N. J. L. 421; Van Riper v. Essex Public Road Board, 38 Id. 23; Old Dominion C. M. & S. Co. v. State Board of Taxes, 91 Id. 173, 177.

Calhoon v. Buhre

75 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1907

Katzin v. … All board to be billed at regular rates.