Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Township of Eatontown v. Monmouth Electric Co.

    75 N.J.L. 459 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1907

    Hess v. Cole, 3 Zab. 116; Hutton v. Camden, 10 Vroom 122. … State v. Runyon, 12 Vroom 98 ; Nixon v. Ruple, 1 Id. 58.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Gross

    85 N.J. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1980

    REPORT OF DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with this Court recommending that NELSON G. … United States v. Gross, 375 F.Supp. 971 (D.N.J.1974), aff’d 511 F.2d 910 (ed Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 266 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Speakman v. Mayor and Council of Borough of North Plainfield

    8 N.J. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 1951

    Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Rutherford, 4 N. J. 577, 585 (1950). … Menges v. Tp. of Bernards, 4 N. J. 556, 559 (1950); Lynch v. Hillsdale, supra; Appley v. Bernards Twp., supra; Gaston v. Ackerman, 6 N. J. Misc. 696, 697 (Sup. Ct. 1928); Cassinari v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Lake Intervale Homes, Inc. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills

    28 N.J. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1958

    As stated in Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. … Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N. J. 94 (1957); Herman v. Board of Adjustment, Parsippany-Troy Hills, supra; Rodee v. Lee, supra. Subdivision control, like zoning, is an implementing tool of planning.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Flynn v. Consolidated Traction Co.

    64 N.J.L. 375 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1900

    City Railway Co. v. Lee, 21 Vroom 435 . … Whalen v. Consolidated Traction Co., 32 Vroom 606 . *378 In delivering the opinion of the court in that case, Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DeSantis v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

    11 N.J. Misc. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1933

    However, the defendants board of public utility commissioners and state highway commission are undoubtedly stare agencies. Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Schlechter, 83 N. J. L. 88; 83 Atl. … Rep. 783 ; Stephens v. Commissioners of Palisades Interstate Park, 93 N. J. L. 500; 108 Atl. Rep. 645 ; Nesbitt v. Board of Managers of New Jersey Agriclultural Experiment Station, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 19; 157 Atl.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. O'Brien

    136 N.J.L. 118 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1947

    State v. Young, 37 Id. 184. … Whether it existed as a de jure or de facto board is not important. Kirby v. State, 57 N. J. L. 320. Moreover, the board is not an accused party.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • City Railway Co. v. Lee

    50 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1888

    Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 268, 824; Runyon v. C. R. R. Co., 1 Dutcher 556; Drake v. Mount, 4 Vroom 441 ; Penna. R. R. Co. v. Mathews, 7 Vroom 531 ; D., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. Toffey, 9 Vroom 525 . … Nolan v. *438 Brooklyn R. R. Co., 87 N. Y. 63 ; Meesel v. Lynn R. R. Co., 8 Allen 324 ; Fleck v. Union Ry. Co., 134 Mass. 481 . In Meesel v. Lynn R. R.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs

    51 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1968

    J. 552 (1955), Fenning v. S. G. Holding Corp., 47 N. J. Super. 110 (App. Div. 1957), and Middlesex Concrete Products and Excavating Corporation v. Carteret Industrial Association, 68 *269 N. J. Super. 85 (App. … Super., at pp. 131-133 and Fenning v. S. G. Holdng Corp., supra (47 N. J. Super., at pp. 118-119).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Kieckhefer Container Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

    125 N.J.L. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1940

    This case involves the same questions as are presented in the case of this prosecutor v. Bowen et al., 125 N. J. … If Aurich is classified as a “utility man” the Board of Review held that utility men did not participate in the dispute. And this seems to be a warranted conclusion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Santucci v. City of Paterson

    113 N.J.L. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 12, 1934

    Reck v. Board of Commissioners of North Bergen, 110 N. J. L. 173; 164 Atl. Rep. 468 ; May v. Board of Commissioners of Nutley, 111 N. J. L. 166; 168 Atl. Rep. 140 ; Colgarry v. Newark, 85 N. J. L. 583; Harker v. … Bayonne, 85 Id. 176 ; Ingram v. Jersey *195 City, 63 Id. 542; Caulfield v. Jersey City, 63 Id. 148; Beirne v. Jersey City, 60 Id. 109; Newark v. Lyon, 53 Id. 632.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Coxon v. Inhabitants of Trenton

    78 N.J.L. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1909

    Justice Fort in Crickenberger v. Westfield, 42 Vroom 467 . *30 The other reason urged for vacating the ordinance is good. … The case indeed goes beyond that of Sears v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kelsea v. Ramsey & Gore Manufacturing Co.

    55 N.J.L. 320 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

    Brown v. Hodgson, 2 Campb. 37; Dutton v. Solomonson, 3 Bos. & P. 582; Dunlop v. Lambert, 6 Cl. & F. 600; Fragano v. Long, 4 Barn. & C. 219; Dawes v. Peck, 8 Term 330; Krulder v. Ellison, 47 N. Y. 36 ; Wilcox Company v. … Green, 72 Id. 17; Spencer v. *323 Hale, 30 Vt. 314 ; Stanton v. Eager, 16 Pick. 467 ; Hunter v. Wright, 12 Allen 548 ; Hall v. Richardson, 16 Md. 396 ; Magruder v. Gage, 33 Id. 344; 1 Benj.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McArdle v. Mayor of Jersey City

    66 N.J.L. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1901

    Hoagland, 22 Vroom 62 ; Mortland v. Christian, 23 Id. 521; In re Haynes, 25 Id. 6; In re Sewer Assessment for Passaic, Id. 156; Owens v. Fury, 26 Id. 1; Matheson v. Caminade, Id. 4; Baker v. Delaney, Id. 9; McLean v. … In Allison v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nolan v. Witkowski

    32 N.J. 426 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 23, 1960

    Pesin v. Witkowski 31 N. J. 73 (1959). … S. 40:72-2 that authority passed to the governing body, i. e., the board of commissioners, of a city (such as Jersey City) operating under the Walsh Act. Connors v. City of Bayonne, 36 N. J. Super. 390 (App.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Godfrey v. McGann

    37 N.J. 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1962

    S. 2A:7-13, 2A:166-10, and 2A:169-9; see also City of Passaic v. Passaic County, 54 N. J. Super. 254 (App. Div. 1959). … See Pierson v. O’Connor, 54 N. J. L. 36 (Sup. Ct. 1891). Since employees of the Probation Department are appointed by the chief probation officer, N. J.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Department of Civil Service

    7 N.J. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1951

    Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N. J. 99, 108 (1950). And that under R. 8. 40:46-23, supra, salary ranges must in the first instance be fixed by ordinance. Howard v. … Handlon v. Town of Belleville, supra, at p. 109; Van Brookhoven v. Kennedy, supra, at p. 182; Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380 (Sup. Ct. 1938). II The effect of P. L. 1936, c. 6.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State v. Wittenberg

    26 N.J. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1958

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Herten v. State

    99 N.J. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Carling v. Mayor of Jersey City

    71 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

    Kraft v. Board of Education, 38 Vroom 512 , where cases are cited. … Oakley v. Atlantic City, 34 Id. 127.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.