Case law

Sellitto v. Township of Cedar Grove

132 N.J.L. 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1944

Armitage v. Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5. … Faist v. Hoboken, 72 Id. 361; Kelly v. Freeholders of Essex, 90 Id. 411. Prima facie he was entitled to receive the contract. Ianniello v. Harrison, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 111. Mr.

J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs

51 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1968

J. 552 (1955), Fenning v. S. G. Holding Corp., 47 N. J. Super. 110 (App. Div. 1957), and Middlesex Concrete Products and Excavating Corporation v. Carteret Industrial Association, 68 *269 N. J. Super. 85 (App. … Super., at pp. 131-133 and Fenning v. S. G. Holdng Corp., supra (47 N. J. Super., at pp. 118-119).

Hutton v. City of Camden

39 N.J.L. 122 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1876

Moulin v. Insurance Co., 4 Zab. 222. And the principle was strongly emphasized in Hess v. … Youngs v. Overseers of Hardiston, 2 Green 518; Turnpike Co. v. Hall, 2 Harr. 337 .

Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. New Jersey Casino Control Commission

85 N.J. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 1981

Subsequent decisions, upholding the ruling in Parker v. Brown, have refined the standards for finding antitrust immunity for state action. „ See, e. g., Goldfarb v. … Brown.

State ex rel. Dugan v. Farrier

47 N.J.L. 383 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1885

To the same effect is Corrigan v. Duryea, 11 Vroom 266 . Said Mr. Justice Daniel, in Wright v. Mattison, 18 How. (U. … Scadding v. Lorant, 3 H. L. Cas. 418.

Toll Bros. v. Township of West Windsor

167 N.J. 600 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 2001

Allas v. Borough of Rumson

115 N.J.L. 593 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 9, 1935

Compare Watkins v. Freeholders of Atlantic, 73 N. J. L. 213; Wild v. Paterson, 47 Id. 406; Johnson v. Board of Education of Wildwood, 102 Id. 606. … , while the board contended, as in Cochran v.

Coxon v. Inhabitants of Trenton

78 N.J.L. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1909

Justice Fort in Crickenberger v. Westfield, 42 Vroom 467 . *30 The other reason urged for vacating the ordinance is good. … The case indeed goes beyond that of Sears v.

Angermeier v. Borough of Sea Girt

27 N.J. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1958

Magnolia Development Co. v. … J. 223 (1952); City of Rahway v. Raritan Homes, 21 N. J. Super. 541 (App. Div. 1952); City of Newark v. Padula, 26 N. J. Super. 251 (App.

Riley v. Inhabitants of the City of Trenton

51 N.J.L. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889

Greeley v. Passaic, 13 Vroom 87 . The present case not being within the exception as to offences indictable at common law. State v. Anderson, 11 Vroom 224 . … The supplemental act of 1886 is a grant of original powers to boards of excise commissioners. *500 UnjáL^nchJsom^fe-a^ there is no person in whom the •power can vast. — The erection ot tHese~boards is entrusted to the governing

Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. Peep

34 N.J. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1961

In MacKenzie v. … See also Mirinda v. King, supra; Litcher v. Trust Co. of N. J., 18 N. J. Super. 101 (Ch. Div. 1952), affirmed 11 N. J. 64 (1952); Brown v. Condit, 70 N. J. Eq. 440 (Ch. 1905); Levin v. Attorney-General, 136 N. J.

Dodd v. Francisco

68 N.J.L. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

Dodd v. State Board of Health, 38 Vroom 463 . … In this respect the board resembles boards of assessment whose proceedings involve the exercise of judicial functions (Peckham v.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of Hoboken

10 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1952

J. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N. J. L. 1 (Sup. … State Board, &c., 103 N. J. L. 33 (Sup. Ct. 1926). Central R. R. Co. v. State Board was also cited in State v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 134 N. J. L. 34 (Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed 135 N. J.

Kolitch v. Lindedahl

100 N.J. 485 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1985

See, e.g., Birchwood Lakes Colony Club, Inc. v. Borough of Medford Lakes, 90 N.J. 582 (1982); Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565 (1981); Costa v. Josey, 83 N.J. 49 (1980); Schriger v. Abraham, 83 N.J. 46 (1980). … Prosser & Keeton, supra, at 1041-42 & nn. 99 & 1 (collecting federal cases); see also, e.g., Harvey v. Board of Commissioners of Wabash, 416 N.E.2d 1296 (Ind.

Murray v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea

137 N.J.L. 106 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1948

The ordinance clearly indicates an intention to distinguish between hotels and boarding houses or rooming houses. … Beronio v. Pension Commission of Hoboken, 130 N. J. L. 620. The rule is discharged, but without costs.

Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. Davis

13 N.J. Misc. 620 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 13, 1935

In Deborah Jewish, &c., Society v. State Board of Health, 7 N. J. Mis. R. 418; 145 Atl. … Rep. 593 , to set aside a decision of a board of adjustment and to review an ordinance. In DeVito v. Pearsall, &c., Borough of Rumson, 115 N. J.

Sapio v. Davis

228 N.J. 58 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 2016

In Re the New Jersey Individual Health Coverage Program's Readoption

179 N.J. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 2004

See Chopper Express, Inc. v. Dep’t of Ins., 293 N.J. … Auth. v.

Frelinghuysen v. Town of Morristown

77 N.J.L. 493 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1909

In Williamson v. New Jersey Southern Railroad Co., 2 Stew. Eq. 311, 334, this court said that the statute is only declarative of the law as judicially pronounced in Hunt v. … See, also, Town of Belvidere v. Warren Railroad Co., 5 Vroom 193 , 196; City of Elizabeth v. Hill, 10 Id. 555, 558; Roxbury Lodge v. Hocking, 31 Id. 439, 443; Jersey City v.

State v. Best

70 N.J. 56 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1976

Best and Brown left the bar a few moments later. … Best and Brown drove away.