Case law

Lake Intervale Homes, Inc. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills

28 N.J. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1958

As stated in Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. … Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N. J. 94 (1957); Herman v. Board of Adjustment, Parsippany-Troy Hills, supra; Rodee v. Lee, supra. Subdivision control, like zoning, is an implementing tool of planning.

Valdes v. Baumann

131 N.J.L. 43 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1943

The relator relies upon Larkey v. Bayonne, 123 N. J. L. 134; affirmed, 124 Id. 172. … If the appointment had been made by the Board of Health it could have been for a five year term. Bodnar v. Board of Health of Carteret, 117 N. J. L. 527.

Bowden v. Bedell

68 N.J.L. 451 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

L., ¶. 41; Bakely v. Nowrey, ante p. 95. … Attorney-General v. Detroit, 58 Mich. 213 ; Evansville v. State, 118 Ind. 426 ; Baltimore v. State, 15 Md. 376, 468, 484 ; Cooley Const. Dim. 481.

Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood

77 N.J.L. 141 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

The method of ascertaining for the purposes of taxation the full amount of capital and accumulated surplus has been *142 pointed out in Fidelity Trust Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, ante p. 128. … To adopt this argument would allow the taxpayer to usurp the functions of the assessor and the county board. The law casts upon the assessor and the boards of taxation the duty to make and fix the valuations.

Fort v. Howell

58 N.J.L. 541 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1896

It is to this precinct board that the relators demand appointment by the county board as of legal right. … Rex v. Bankes, 3 Burr. 1452; Rex v. Mayor of Cambridge, 4 Id. 2008 ; Leeds v. Atlantic City, 23 Vroom 332 , and eases there cited. As to these seven relators our opinion is that the rule to show cause must be dismissed.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of Hoboken

10 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1952

J. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 N. J. L. 1 (Sup. … State Board, &c., 103 N. J. L. 33 (Sup. Ct. 1926). Central R. R. Co. v. State Board was also cited in State v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 134 N. J. L. 34 (Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed 135 N. J.

J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs

51 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1968

J. 552 (1955), Fenning v. S. G. Holding Corp., 47 N. J. Super. 110 (App. Div. 1957), and Middlesex Concrete Products and Excavating Corporation v. Carteret Industrial Association, 68 *269 N. J. Super. 85 (App. … Super., at pp. 131-133 and Fenning v. S. G. Holdng Corp., supra (47 N. J. Super., at pp. 118-119).

Joseph H. Reinfeld, Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.

94 N.J. 400 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 1983

with the provisions of any act or regulation administered by the board.” … Respondents also assert that the state action doctrine of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), exempts them from the Sherman Act.

Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. New Jersey Casino Control Commission

85 N.J. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 1981

Subsequent decisions, upholding the ruling in Parker v. Brown, have refined the standards for finding antitrust immunity for state action. „ See, e. g., Goldfarb v. … Brown.

State ex rel. Dugan v. Farrier

47 N.J.L. 383 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1885

To the same effect is Corrigan v. Duryea, 11 Vroom 266 . Said Mr. Justice Daniel, in Wright v. Mattison, 18 How. (U. … Scadding v. Lorant, 3 H. L. Cas. 418.

Coxon v. Inhabitants of Trenton

78 N.J.L. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1909

Justice Fort in Crickenberger v. Westfield, 42 Vroom 467 . *30 The other reason urged for vacating the ordinance is good. … The case indeed goes beyond that of Sears v.

Toll Bros. v. Township of West Windsor

167 N.J. 600 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 2001

Woodman v. Bianchi

13 N.J. Misc. 452 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 4, 1935

This point has been disposed of, adversely to prosecutor, in O’Brien v. Parnell, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 99; 169 Atl. Rep. 539. There Mr. … See Zober v. Turner, 106 N. J. L. 86; 148 Atl. Rep. 894 ; Crane v. Jersey City, 90 N. J. L. 109; 103 Atl. Rep. 678 ; affirmed, 92 N. J. L. 248; 103 Atl. Rep. 1051 . Writ dismissed, with costs.

Dodd v. Francisco

68 N.J.L. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

Dodd v. State Board of Health, 38 Vroom 463 . … In this respect the board resembles boards of assessment whose proceedings involve the exercise of judicial functions (Peckham v.

Kingsley v. Hawthorne Fabrics, Inc.

41 N.J. 521 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 17, 1964

See Adams v. Atlantic County, 137 N. J. L. 648, 652 (E. & A. 1948); City of Camden v. Local Government Board, 127 N. J. L. 175 (Sup. Ct. 1941); 1 Davis, Administrative Law §§ 5.05, 5.06 (1958). … Brown, “Regulations, Reenactment, and the Revenue Acts,” 54 Harv. L. Rev. 377 , 387-388 (1941).

Allas v. Borough of Rumson

115 N.J.L. 593 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 9, 1935

Compare Watkins v. Freeholders of Atlantic, 73 N. J. L. 213; Wild v. Paterson, 47 Id. 406; Johnson v. Board of Education of Wildwood, 102 Id. 606. … , while the board contended, as in Cochran v.

State ex rel. Whitney v. Van Buskirk

40 N.J.L. 463 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878

Corp., § 163 ; State v. Newark, 3 Dutcher 185; State v. Ferguson, 2 Vroom 107 . … State v. Foster, 2 Halst. 101; State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 413; State, Shreve, pros., v. Crosley, 7 Vroom 428 .

South Jersey Gas Co. v. SunOlin Chemical Co.

116 N.J. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 3, 1989

Ventures, Inc. v. … Comm’n of Colorado v.

Angermeier v. Borough of Sea Girt

27 N.J. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1958

Magnolia Development Co. v. … J. 223 (1952); City of Rahway v. Raritan Homes, 21 N. J. Super. 541 (App. Div. 1952); City of Newark v. Padula, 26 N. J. Super. 251 (App.

Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. Davis

13 N.J. Misc. 620 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 13, 1935

In Deborah Jewish, &c., Society v. State Board of Health, 7 N. J. Mis. R. 418; 145 Atl. … Rep. 593 , to set aside a decision of a board of adjustment and to review an ordinance. In DeVito v. Pearsall, &c., Borough of Rumson, 115 N. J.