Case law

DKM Residential Properties Corp. v. Township of Montgomery

182 N.J. 296 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 2005

Corp. v. Tp. of Montgomery, 363 N.J.Super. 80, 83 , 831 A.2d 110 (2003). … Franklin Tower One L.L.C. v. N.M., 157 N.J. 602, 613 , 725 A.2d 1104 (1999).

J. S. Rippel & Co. v. City of Newark

136 N.J. Eq. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1945

Ridgewood Elks Holding Co. v. Ridgewood, 127 N. J. Law 295. The taxes are upheld by R. S. 54:4-58 to the extent, or in the amounts that complainants were, in fact, liable to taxation. … The judgment of the State Board controls. Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 75 N. J. Law 416. Complainants had their remedy by certiorari and did not choose to pursue'it.

Fox v. KINGS GRANT MAINTENANCE ASSN.

167 N.J. 208 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 2001

In Thanasoulis v. … See State v.

Cozy Lake, Inc. v. Nyoda Girls' Camp, Inc.

99 N.J. Eq. 384 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

In the spring of 1924 the gate was replaced by new batter-boards claimed to be of the same height as the gate and former batter-boards. … In the recently decided ease of Exton v. Glen Gardner Water Co., 129 Atl.

In Re Formal Complaint by Morris Tp.

49 N.J. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1967

Compare, City of Texarkana v. Wiggins, 151 Tex. 100 , 246 S.W. 2 d 622 ( Sup. Ct. 1952). We do not regard In re Glen Rock, supra , or Woodside Homes, Inc. v. … The dictum was reiterated in Woodside Homes, Inc. v.

Joseph H. Reinfeld, Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.

94 N.J. 400 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 1983

with the provisions of any act or regulation administered by the board.” … Respondents also assert that the state action doctrine of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), exempts them from the Sherman Act.

State ex rel. Kimball v. Hendee

57 N.J.L. 307 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

On the following day they met and organized as the board of education, took possession of the school property and proceeded to transact the business committed to *308 that board, and thereafter continued in the unchallenged … Allison v. Blake, ante p. 6. In State v. Deshler, 1 Dutcher 177, it was adjudged that trustees of school districts were officers within, this constitutional provision.

Dresner v. Carrara

69 N.J. 237 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1976

They were referred by the inspector to the Planning Board. … Const., Art. 4, § 6, ¶ 2; Fischer v. Bedminster Township, 11 N. J. 194, 201 (1953); J. D. Construction Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of Freehold Township, 119 N. J. Super. 140, 144 (Law Div. 1972); Piscitelli v.

Hann v. Borough of Sea Girt

134 N.J.L. 74 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1946

Consequently, when shortly thereafter prosecutor applied to the Board of Adjustment for a variance, the authority of that board was limited, R. … Bianchi v. Morey, 128 N. J. L. 219. Every case must stand upon its own facts.

Too Much Media, LLC v. Hale

206 N.J. 209 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 2011

Defendant was free to exercise a right at the heart of our democracy by posting her thoughts online on Oprano’s message board. See Reno v. … In O’Grady v.

Greenberg v. Kimmelman

99 N.J. 552 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1985

In the 1950’s and 60’s, for example, the Court employed the equal protection clause to invalidate racial segregation, see Brown v. … Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); legislative apportionments previously considered to be beyond the jurisdiction of the federal courts, Baker v.

In Re the New Jersey Individual Health Coverage Program's Readoption

179 N.J. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 2004

See Chopper Express, Inc. v. Dep’t of Ins., 293 N.J. … Auth. v.

Deerfield Realty Co. v. Hague

8 N.J. Misc. 637 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1930

the proposed erection or alteration is to be- *639 made, the board shall have the power to direct the building department to issue all necessary building permits. … Such was the holding in Butvinik v. Jersey City, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 803, the opinion of which was filed July 37th, 1938.

Wilson v. Mayor of Collingswood

81 N.J.L. 634 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1911

Gillen v. Spring Lake, 32 Vroom 392 ; Frelinghuysen v. Morristown, 47 Id. 271, 280; 48 Id. 493. The latter case involved the construction of sewers, but the principle is applicable to the present case. … Justice Magie, in Biddle v. Riverton, 29 Vroom 289 , is applicable.

State v. Palacio

111 N.J. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 1988

[State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454, 459 (1967).] In State v. … Defendant maintains that a recent Appellate Division opinion applying Brown, State v.

Jones v. Buford

71 N.J. 433 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 4, 1976

Board of Health of Woodbridge Township, 9 N. J. 431, 435 (1952); Board of Health of Township of Scotch Plains v. Pinto, 57 N. J. 212, 214 (1970). They derive their powers from State legislation. Grosso v. … In each case local action on the part of a board of health is needed to implement the legislative grant. Just as in the case cited above, Finn v.

Wilson v. McGuinness

78 N.J.L. 346 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1910

The Park Commission act has come before this court in repeated cases (Freeholders of Essex v. Park Commission, 33 Vroom 376 , where a mandamus upon the board of freeholders was sanctioned; Ro ss v. … Allison v.

Thurber v. City of Burlington

191 N.J. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 2007

[Mazza v. … Co. v.

Boyle v. County of Hudson

8 N.J. 294 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 17, 1951

. & A. 1935), Hammond v. County of Monmouth, 117 N. J. L. 11 (Sup. Ct. 1936), and Fisher v. Nutley, 120 N. J. L. 290 (E. & A. 1938). … The County of Hudson in operating, through its board of chosen freeholders, the county penitentiary was discharging a governmental duty.

State v. Celmer

80 N.J. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1979

Walz, supra, 397 U.S. at 674 , 90 S.Ct. at 1414 , 25 L.Ed. 2d at 704 ; see, e.g., National Labor Relations Board v. … See, e.g., Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 , 60 S.Ct. 900 , 84 L.Ed. 1213 (1940); Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).