Case law

McClain v. Bd. of Review

232 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 2018

Earneka Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 2025

Buck, 207 N.J. at 389 (quoting Ryan v. … .”); State v.

Fielders v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

68 N.J.L. 343 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

Moore v. Gadsden, 93 N. Y. 12 ; City of Rochester v. Campbell, 123 Id. 405; Kirby v. Boylston Market Association, 14 Gray 249 ; City of Hartford v. Talcott,.48 Conn. 525 ; Flynn v. The Canton Co., 40 Md. 312 ; Taylor v. … Knupfle v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 84 N. Y. 488 ; Connolly v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 114 Id. 104; McRickard v. Flint, Id. 222; Wright v. Malden and Melrose Railroad Co., 4 Allen 283 ; Salisbury v.

Brinkerhoff v. Mayor of Jersey City

64 N.J.L. 225 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1900

Erwin, 30 Vroom 282 , declared its opinion to be that a de facto appointing board could not create a de jure officer by its appointment. *228 When that ease was reviewed in this court (Erwin v. … Fraser’s title to membership in the board was afterwardsquestioned on quo warranto, and he was ousted from his position by the judgment of the Supreme Court. Edelstein v. Fraser, 27 Vroom 3 .

Robert A. Verry v. Franklin Fire District No. 1 (Somerset) (077495) (Statewide)

230 N.J. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 7, 2017

See Murray v. … See DiProspero v. Penn, 183 N.J. 477, 492 , 874 A.2d 1039 (2005) (quoting Craster v. Bd. of Comm’rs of *299 Newark, 9 N.J. 225, 230 , 87 A.2d 721 (1952)).

J. S. Rippel & Co. v. City of Newark

136 N.J. Eq. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1945

Ridgewood Elks Holding Co. v. Ridgewood, 127 N. J. Law 295. The taxes are upheld by R. S. 54:4-58 to the extent, or in the amounts that complainants were, in fact, liable to taxation. … The judgment of the State Board controls. Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 75 N. J. Law 416. Complainants had their remedy by certiorari and did not choose to pursue'it.

In Re Application of Howard Smith

57 N.J. 368 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1971

Swan v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, 85 N. J. Super. 226, 231 (App. Div. 1964). … See DeLorenzo v. Board of Commissioners of City of Newark, 134 N. J. L. 7 (E. & A. 1946); Pirher v. Board of Public Works of South River, 37 N. J. Super. 482, 484 (1955), certif. den. 20 N. J. 465 (1956).

Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

129 N.J.L. 333 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 1943

Yale and Towne Manufacturing Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 110 N. J. L. 592; 166 Atl. Rep. 473 ; John P. Callaghan, Inc., v. Continental Casualty Co., 110 N. J. L. 390; 166 Atl. Rep. 83 ; Johnson Service Co. v. … Rep. 756 ; Bowery v. Babbit, 99 Fla. 1151 ; 128 So. Rep. 801 . We hold therefore that there was not an acceptance of the building by the Board of Education on July 11th, 1940, within the meaning of the statute, supra.

Borough of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Sewer Authority

9 N.J. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 2, 1952

Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commrs., 87 N. J. L. 170 (E. & A. 1915); N. J. State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co., 113 N. J. L. 287, 292 (Sup. Ct. *544 1934), modified 115 N. J. … . & A. 1935); State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504, 521 (E. & A. 1935).

Fox v. KINGS GRANT MAINTENANCE ASSN.

167 N.J. 208 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 2001

In Thanasoulis v. … See State v.

Hilton Acres v. Klein

35 N.J. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 23, 1961

See Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N. J. 94, 108-109 (1957). … See also Kotlarich v. Ramsey, 51 N. J. Super. 520, 531-532 (App. Div. 1958).

Market Street Mission v. Bureau of Rooming & Boarding House Standards

110 N.J. 335 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1988

Mission v. Bureau of Rooming and Boarding House Standards, 217 N.J.Super. 56, 68 (1987). … State v. Profaci, 56 N.J. 346 , 350 *341 (1970).

State ex rel. Kimball v. Hendee

57 N.J.L. 307 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

On the following day they met and organized as the board of education, took possession of the school property and proceeded to transact the business committed to *308 that board, and thereafter continued in the unchallenged … Allison v. Blake, ante p. 6. In State v. Deshler, 1 Dutcher 177, it was adjudged that trustees of school districts were officers within, this constitutional provision.

Kress v. City of Newark

8 N.J. 562 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1952

Kress first noticed brown spots on her hands. These small wart-like irritations or plats on the top of her fingers and hands would sometimes break off and bleed. … Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp., 4 N. J. 135, 149 (1950); Paolercio v. Wright, 2 N. J. 412, 417 (1949); Esposito v. Lazar, 2 N. J. 257, 259 (1949). Rule 3 :59—1.

Vogel v. Lyncar Corp.

48 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 20, 1966

Darcy v. Darcy

51 N.J.L. 140 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1888

In the case of King v. … State v. Bentley, 3 Zab. 532; State v. Brannin, Id. 484; State, Longstreet, pros., v. Jones, 9 Vroom 83 .

Boss Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Atlantic City

40 N.J. 379 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1963

In Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. … Deitsch v. Board of Liquor Lincense Comm’rs, 58-1 U. S. Tax Cas. ¶ 9496, at p. 68, 334 (Md. Cir. Ct. 1958).

Higgins v. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics of the Supreme Court

73 N.J. 123 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1977

In State v. Rizzo, 69 N. J. 28, 30 (1975) we said: “* * * However, a lawyer must avoid even the appearance of impropriety, DR9-101, to the end that the image of disinterested justice is not impoverished or tainted. … To the same effect we held in State v. Galati, 64 N.

Dubin v. Wich

120 N.J.L. 469 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1938

There is a presumption of a lawful exercise of power by the board of adjustment. Phillips Oil Co. v. Municipal Council of Clifton, 120 N. J. L. 13; Schnell v. … Township Committee of Township of Ocean, 120 Id. 194; Cook v. Board of Adjustment, &c., Trenton, 118 Id. 372; Feldman & Pivnick v. Board of Adjustment, &c., East Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 520.

State ex rel Rose v. Hufty

63 N.J.L. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

L. 1871, p. 210) expressly preserved to a board of education thereby constituted the powers and duties of the pre-existing board. … The constitutionálity of this act was upheld in Oler v. Ridgeway, 26 Vroom 10 , and the Camden board of education is now organized under it.