Case law

Marchitto v. Central R. Co. of NJ

9 N.J. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1952

. & A. 1937); National Surety Co. v. Clement, 133 N. J. L. 22 (E. & A. 1945); Hughes v. Eisner, 8 N. J. 228 (1951). … Is this fact alone sufficient, as the defendants contend, to vest the National Railroad Adjustment Board *464 with jurisdiction to the exclusion of the courts of this State ? Clearly it is not. In Moore v. Illinois C.

Erie Railroad Co. v. S.J. Groves Sons Co.

111 N.J.L. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1933

Judge Brown, in his memorandum, cited the case of Wagoner v. Watts, 44 N J. … Judge Brown, in granting the motion to strike out the Surety Company’s answer and enter summary judgment against it, very succinctly and correctly stated the law applicable to this case.

Steinberg v. Bigelow

3 N.J. Misc. 1228 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1925

This decision has been followed in innumerable cases, among which are Falco v. Kallenbach, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 333; Becker & Son v. Dowling, 128 Atl. Rep. 395 ; Union County Development Co. v. Kaltenbach, 3 N. J. Mis. … This was decided in the case of Ignaciunas v. Risley, supra. It was not necessary for the prosecutor to appeal to the board of adjustment. This was so held in the case of E. Krumgold & Sons v. Jersey City, supra.

Reeve v. First National Bank

54 N.J.L. 208 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

Bean v. Pioneer Mining Co., 66 Cal. 451 ; Atkins v. Brown, 59 Me. 90; Castle v. Belfast Foundry Co., 72 Id. 167 ; Miller v. Roach, 150 Mass. 140 ; Draper v. Massachusetts Steam Heating Co., 5 Allen 338 ; Liebscher v. … Draper v. Massachusetts Steam Heating Co., supra; Bean v. Pioneer Mining Co., supra; Rand. Com. Paper.

Losick v. Binda

102 N.J.L. 157 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1925

That was the situation presented in Allen v. Paterson, 98 N. J. … Ignaciunas v. Risley, 98 N. J. L. 712; affirmed by this court in 99 Id. 389. The judgment appealed from will therefore he affirmed. .

Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town Council

68 N.J. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1975

Bowles v. Willingham, supra, 321 U.S. at 519 , 64 S.Ct. at 649 , 88 L.Ed. at 905 ; Wilson v. Brown, supra, 137 F. 2d at 351-52 ; Teeval, Co. v. Stern, 301 N.Y. 346, 362 , 93 N.E. 2d 884, 890 (Ct. App. 1950). … [ Marcus Brown Holding Co. v.

Mayer v. TOWN OF MONTCLAIR BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

32 N.J. 130 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 4, 1960

Russell v. Board of Adjustment, 31 N. J. 58, 69-70 (1959); Andrews v. Board of Adjustment, 30 N. J. 245, 251 (1959). … Andrews v. Board of Adjustment, supra, 30 N. J., at page 251.

Burke v. Gormley

79 N.J.L. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1910

Lodor v. McGovern, 3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 275. … This naturally disposes of the application for mcmdamus, but counsel for the relator insists that he is entitled to it under the decision in Salmon v. Haynes, 21 Vroom 97 , and in *261 Ahrens v.

Whippany Paperboard Co. v. Local No. 301, United Paperworkers

11 N.J. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1952

Cooper v. Cooper, 103 N. J. Eq. 416, 420 (Ch. 1928); Dietrick v. Dietrick, 99 N. J. Eq. 711, 712 (Ch. 1926); Warren v. Warren, 92 N. J. Eq. 334, 339 (Ch. 1921); Rigney v. Rigney, 62 N. J. … State v. Carlino, 99 N. J.

Schierstead v. City of Brigantine

29 N.J. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1959

See Morris Canal and Banking Co. v. Central Railroad Co., 16 N. J. Eq. 419, 428 (Ch. 1863); In re Merrill, 88 N. J. Eq. *231 261, 273 (Prerog. Ct. 1917); May v. Board of Com’rs of Town of Nutley, 111 N. J. … R. 4:9-1; Untermann v. Untermann, 19 N. J. 507, 518 (1955); Brown v. Brown, 2 N. J. 252, 255 (1949); cf. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial Park, 43 N. J. Super. 244, 248 (App. Div. 1957); Kurtz v. Oremland, 24 N.

City of Newark v. Fischer

8 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1951

In Quackenbush v. State, 57 N. J. L. 18 (Sup. … As said in Randolph v. Larned, 27 N. J.

Cooper v. Maplewood Club

43 N.J. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1964

J. 291 (1951); Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952); Gerkin v. Village of Ridgewood, 17 N. J. Super. 472 (App. Div. 1952); Whitehead v. Kearny Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 51 N. J. Super. 560 (App. … Since we find that the Board’s determination lacked a reasonable basis it cannot be upheld. See Stolz v. Ellenstein, supra; Gerkin v. Village of Ridgewood, supra; Whitehead v. Kearny Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, supra.

Town Council of Montclair v. Baxter

76 N.J.L. 68 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1908

Stockton v. Board of Education, 43 Vroom 80 . If this controversy arose under the school laws the writ was prematurely allowed, since there had been no appeal to the state board of education. … Both bodies are represented in the board of estimate.

Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin Lakes

28 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1958

In Wilson v. City of Long Branch, 27 N. … B. 1:27A; Abbatemarco v. Colton, 31 N. J. Super. 181 (App. Div. 1954); Barber v. Vaccaro, 32 N. J. Super. 573 {App. Div. 1954).

Simon v. O'Toole

108 N.J.L. 32 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1931

Rep. 611; In re Opinion of the Justices, 91 Id. 405; City of Boston v. Talbot, Ibid. 1015; Salisbury Land and Improvement Co. v. Commonwealth, 102 Id. 619. … Salisbury Land and Improvement Co. v.

Brazer v. Borough of Mountainside

55 N.J. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1970

See also to the same general effect, Battaglia v. Wayne Township Planning Board, 98 N. J. Super. 194 (App. Div. 1967). 5 Lomarch Corp. v. Mayor of Englewood, 51 N. J. 108 (1968), demonstrates the same underlying thesis. … Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board of Princeton Township, supra. (52 N. J. 348).

Fagan v. Payne

75 N.J.L. 851 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1904

Siat., § 169; Allen v. Louisiana, 103 U. S. 80 ; People v. Porter, 90 N. Y. 68 . … State v. Elizabeth, 11 Vroom 278 . A clause providing for a penalty is good, although the manner provided for recovering a penalty is bad. Campbell v. Board of Pharmacy, 16 Id. 241.

Tahisha Roach v. Bm Motoring, Llc(077125)

228 N.J. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 2017

See Pre-Paid Legal Servs., Inc. v. Cahill, 786 F.3d 1287, 1294 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 373 (2015); Sink v. Aden Enters., Inc., 352 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2003); see also Brown v. … To avoid incentivizing businesses to ignore arbitration demands in hopes that the customer will abandon the claim, plaintiffs urge this Court to adopt the rule advanced in Brown v.

Kelly v. Cornish

6 N.J. Misc. 277 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 1928

The board after considering the petitioner’s application, but without giving him a hearing, denied it. … Ten months later a writ of certiorari was sued out of this court to review the action of the pension board. Since the testimony tends to support the findings of the board, the writ is dismissed, with costs.

Bd. Freeholders Hudson Co. v. Sinisi

100 N.J. Eq. 552 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1927