Case law

Bianchi v. Morey

128 N.J.L. 219 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1942

Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J. L. 183; Bianchi v. Morey, 124 Id. 258. … Morgan v. Collingswood, 104 N. J. L. 13; Atlantic Refining Co. v. Haddon Township, 125 Id. 202.

State v. Close

84 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1913

/ ” The Supreme Court was constrained by the authority of Sawter v. … The court will take judicial notice of the census taken under state authority and of the population of counties as determined by it. 16 Cyc. 870; Adams v. Elwood, 176 N. Y. 106 ; Board of Commissioners v.

Burgan v. New Jersey Civil Service Commission

84 N.J.L. 219 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1913

He is, undoubtedly, an officer in the paid service of the state within the cases of Pierson v. O’Connor, 25 Vroom 36 , and Paddock v. Hudson Tax Board, 53 Id. 360. … Smith was employed as secretary to the board.

State v. Cherry

53 N.J.L. 173 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1890

The other objections named in the reasons are disposed of in the case of Riley v. Trenton, 22 Broom 498. The other class of reasons are leveled at the ordinance passed by the board of excise. … The power to pass ordinances is derived by the board from the act of 1886. Rev. Sup., p. 696.

Manahan v. Watts

64 N.J.L. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1900

Johnston v. Wilson, 2 N. H. 202; Jump v. Spence, 28 Md. 1 ; Clark v. Ennis, 16 Vroom 69 , 72; State v. Davis, 1 Gr. 10 ; State v. Ayres, 3 Id. 479 ; Martin v. Barbour, 140 U. S. 634 ; Rex v. … Hearle, 1 Str. 625, 627; Rex v. Reeks, 2 Id. 1445; Rex v. Latham, 3 Burr. 1485, 1487; People v. Richardson, 4 Cow. 97 ; Rex v. Bosworth, 2 Str. 1112; Rex v. March, 2 Burr. 999; Rex v. Love, 12 Mod. 601; Rex v.

Koven v. Stanley

84 N.J.L. 446 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1913

Justice Garrison in Jefferson v. Board of Education, 35 Vroom 59 . … Stockton v. Board of Education, 43 Id. 80 . In Sheridan v. Lankering, 54 Id. 123 , the writ of quo warranto issued; the report does not show whether the right of appeal to the state board had been exhausted.

Carter v. Township of Bordentown

191 N.J. 474 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 2007

Co. v. … See, e.g., Henry v.

Leers v. Green

24 N.J. 239 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1957

Johnson v. Shields, 25 N. J. L. 116 (Sup. Ct. 1855); Hand v. Winton, 38 N. J. L. 122 (Sup. Ct. 1875); Benton v. State, 59 N. J. L. 551 (E. & A. 1896); State v. O’Hagan, 73 N. J. L. 209 (Sup. Ct. 1906); Garven v. … L. 329 (E. & A. 1922); Wilson v. Savino, 10 N. J. 11 (1952); Rogers v. Courier Post Co., 2 N. J. 393 (1949); Earl v. Winne, 14 N. J. 119 (1953); Brogan v. Passaic Daily News, 22 N. J. 139 (1956).

Pieretti v. Mayor and Council of Town of Bloomfield

35 N.J. 382 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

Recently, we pointed out that “the governing body may draw its own ultimate conclusions from the facts adduced before the board.” Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of Paramus, 34 N. J. 406, 415 (1961). … Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 35 N. J. 94, decided May 22, 1961.

Tufaro v. Department of Human Services

90 N.J. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1982

The Division reversed the ALJ, reinstating the decision of the Board. Relying on its decision in Murray v. … See Carlson v. Hannah, 6 N.J. 202, 212 (1951); Sibley v. City Service Transit Co., 2 N.J. 458, 462-63 (1949); Frank v.

Provident Institution for Savings v. Division of Employment Security

32 N.J. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1960

Boque Electric Co. v. Board of Review, etc., Dept. of Labor and Ind., 21 N. J. 431, 435 (1956). … Electrolux Corp. v. Board of Review, 129 N. J. L. 157, 159 (E. & A. 1942).

Hudson v. City of Atlantic City

103 N.J.L. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926

The trial judge based his ruling upon the cases of Water Commissioners of Jersey City v. Brown, 32 N. J. L. 504; Donnelly v. Currie Hardware Co., 66 Id. 388. … We think the case of Water Commissioners of Jersey City v. Brown, supra, is in point and eon- *124 trolling.

State v. Clark

65 N.J. 426 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1974

See State v. Hicks, 54 N. J. 390 (1969); cf. State v. Johns, supra (111 N. J. Super, at 576). … State v. Mickschutz, supra (101 N. J.

Burns v. Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co.

70 N.J.L. 745 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1904

(See this case commented on in Regan v. Palo, 33 Vroom 35 , and Curley v. Hoff, 33 Id. 760.) So in Smith v. … Steamship Co. v. Ingebregsten, 28 Id. 400; Van Steenburgh v. Thornton , 29 Id. 160 ; Maher v. Thropp, 30 Id. 186 ; Hustis v. Banister Co., 34 Id. 465; Smith v. Erie Railroad Co., 38 Id. 636.

Henderson v. Bd. of Commrs. of Township of Lyndhurst

114 N.J.L. 272 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

Braden v. Ward

42 N.J.L. 518 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1880

He employed the firm of Lee, Brown & Hueston, lawyers practicing at Toledo, 10 bring an action. … Lake v. Ingham 3 Vt. 158 ; Heartt v. Chipman, 2 Aik. 162 .

Valentine v. Lamont

13 N.J. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1953

The board took title to the property and for 24 years the title and right of possession of the board was never disputed by the appellant or her predecessor in title, nor was any claim made that the board had acquired no greater … App. 1871), cited with approval in many cases in this state; Binder v. County *581 Board of Education, 224 Ky. 143 , 5 S. W. 2d 903 (Ct.

Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan

59 N.J. 241 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 28, 1971

of Child Welfare boarded with them by that agency. … Brown in Marino v. Mayor and Council of Norwood, 77 N. J. Super. 587 (Law Div. 1963).

In Re Clee

119 N.J.L. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1938

Furthermore, the violation of a *327 directory duty by the several boards will not invalidate the election. Burroughs v. … Irregularities on the part of election boards having no effect upon the voting, &c., will never vitiate an election. Bu rrough v. Branning, supra; Lehlbach v. Haynes, supra; Hacket v. Mayhew supra.

Santamaria v. Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd.

119 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

Munson Steamship Lines v. Newman, 24 Fed. Rep. (2d) 416; Horn v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 81 N. J. L. 729; Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. Fountain, 5 Fed. Rep. (2d) 385. … L. 400; Smith v. Claud Neon Lights, Inc., 110 Id. 326 (at p. 330); Munson Steamship Lines v.