Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. State Tax Dept.
112 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1933
United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., 128 Atl. Rep. 421 . … Pros.) v. Board of Public Works of the City of Camden, 57 N. J. L. 313; 30 Atl. Rep. 581 , and Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co., 82 N. J. L. 133; 81 Atl. Rep. 737 .
Cited 42 timesPublishedVirginia Construction Corp. v. Fairman
39 N.J. 61 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 17, 1962
In Greenway Homes v. River Edge, 137 N. J. L. 453 (Sup. Ct. 1948), the plaintiff built homes in sections 1 and 2 of his development pursuant to approval obtained from the planning board. … People v.
Cited 12 timesPublished23 N.J.L. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1850
So the point was strictly ruled in White v. White, 1 Harr. 202 . … Brown, 2 Harr. 246 . The judgment must he for the plaintiff, with costs. Ogden, J.., concurred. Judgment for demandant. Cited in McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, 5 G. 2S. Qr. 194.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThompson v. Newark Housing Authority
108 N.J. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1987
See Kolitch v. Lindedahl, 100 N.J. 485, 492-93 (1985) (citing Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 575 (1982)). … Co. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDowns v. Mayor, C., South Amboy
116 N.J.L. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936
Cited 8 timesPublished72 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1905
I think it should be held that under .this act county *66 boards of election are lawful entities, and hence capable of being constituted by de facto members. Flaucher v. … Camden, 27 Vroom 244 . .Such boards, even if the members were illegally appointed, are competent to perform all acts for which boards composed of persons lawfully chosen would be competent. Dugan v.
Cited 1 timesPublished74 N.J.L. 255 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907
The declaration sets out that the plaintiff prosecutes for the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hunterdon, but fails to disclose any authority conferred upon him for the purpose, and the first ground of demurrer … L. 1903, p. 547), which provides that “if the board of chosen freeholders of any county * * * shall fail to prosecute any claim or demand of such county, * * * any court in *256 which an action on such claim or demand is
Cited 1 timesPublishedHopewell Valley Citizens' Group, Inc. v. Berwind Property Group Development Co.
204 N.J. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 2011
Citing Brunetti v. … In 1975, in Brunetti v.
Cited 34 timesPublished78 N.J.L. 3 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1909
In the case of Varney v. … Barker v. People, 3 Cow. 686 .
Cited 8 timesPublished102 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1926
Manning v. Hauge, 128 Atl. … The power to issue a writ of mandamus is a discretionary one (Jones Co. v. Guttenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58; O’Hara v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedMahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.
102 N.J. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1986
N.J.S.A. 59:4-2; N.J.S.A. 59:2—3(d); see Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 578 (1981). The extent of the public entity’s culpability beyond ordinary negligence is the critical factor in the statutory scheme. … See Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 170-71 (1984); Soler v. Castmaster, 98 N.J. 137, 153 (1984).
Superseded by statute, as recognized in Ruiz v. MeroCited 52 timesPublishedDunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of Franklin
233 N.J. 127 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrookdale Homes, Inc. v. Johnson
126 N.J.L. 516 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1941
Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 ; 234 Pac. Rep. 381 ; 38 A. L. R. 1479. In Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co., 193 Iowa 1096 ; 184 N. W. Rep. 823 ; 23 A. L. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504; Mansfield & Swett, Inc., v. West Orange, supra. In Brown v. Board of Appeals, 327 Ill. 644 ; 159 N. E. Rep. 225; 56 A. L.
Cited 15 timesPublished212 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 2012
That distinction was illustrated in State v. James Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 610-14 , 573 A.2d 886 (1990). In James Brown , two defendants racing on a highway were alleged to have killed a third driver. … Lawrence Brown, supra, 190 N.J. at 158-59, 919 A.2d 107 ; James Brown, supra, 118 N.J. at 616 , 573 A.2d 886 .
Cited 54 timesPublishedCooper v. Nutley Sun Printing Co., Inc.
36 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1961
Trades Council v. Garmon, 353 *194 U. S. 26, 77 S. Ct. 607 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 618 (1957). But in some circumstances the Board may reject jurisdiction. 29 U. S. C. … Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U. S. 177, 187 , 61 S. Ct. 845 , 85 L. Ed. 1271, 1279 (1941).
Cited 49 timesPublished87 N.J.L. 98 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 19, 1915
This being so the conclusion reached by the board, upon well settled principles, ijill not be disturbed. In Reilly v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Jersey City, 64 N. J. L. 508, Mr. … Dodd v. Camden, 56 N. J. L. 258.” Other cases to the same effect are Devault v. Camden, 48 Id. 433; Ayers v. Newark, 49 Id. 170; Cavanagh v. Police Commissioners, 59 Id. 412; Alcutt v. Police Commissioners, 66 Id. 173.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHankinson v. Inhabitants of the City of Trenton
51 N.J.L. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889
Keeler v. Milledge, 4 Zab. 142; Doughty v. Conover, 13 Vroom 193 . … This board is erected under the provisions of “An act to-establish an excise department in cities in this state,” approved April 8th, 1884 (Pamph.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGauer v. Essex County Division of Welfare
108 N.J. 140 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1987
Under the law counties are authorized to abolish welfare boards. State v. County of Hudson, supra, 161 N.J.Super. at 44 . … E.g., Uricoli v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen’s Retirement System, 91 N.J. 62, 72 (1982); Masse v. Board of Trustees, Pub. Employees Retirement Sys., 87 N.J. 252, 260 (1981); Geller v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMcKim v. Village of South Orange
133 N.J.L. 470 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1945
Justice Trenchard for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Eckert v. West Orange, 90 N. J. … The ordinance of the board and its actions thereunder will be set aside, with costs to the prosecutor.
Cited 14 timesPublishedIn Re Bd. of Fire Commrs., Fire Dist. No. 3, Piscataway
27 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1958
Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.J. 229, 234 (1952); Hackensack Water Co. v. Ruta, 3 N.J. 139, 147 (1949); Long Branch Commission v. Tintern Manor Water Co., 70 N.J. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 11 N.J. 43, 50, 51 (1952). As the Board noted in applying the statute in the earlier case of Middletown v.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna