Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.76s

  • Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. State Tax Dept.

    112 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1933

    United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., 128 Atl. Rep. 421 . … Pros.) v. Board of Public Works of the City of Camden, 57 N. J. L. 313; 30 Atl. Rep. 581 , and Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co., 82 N. J. L. 133; 81 Atl. Rep. 737 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Virginia Construction Corp. v. Fairman

    39 N.J. 61 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 17, 1962

    In Greenway Homes v. River Edge, 137 N. J. L. 453 (Sup. Ct. 1948), the plaintiff built homes in sections 1 and 2 of his development pursuant to approval obtained from the planning board. … People v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Keeler v. Tatnell

    23 N.J.L. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1850

    So the point was strictly ruled in White v. White, 1 Harr. 202 . … Brown, 2 Harr. 246 . The judgment must he for the plaintiff, with costs. Ogden, J.., concurred. Judgment for demandant. Cited in McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, 5 G. 2S. Qr. 194.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Newark Housing Authority

    108 N.J. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1987

    See Kolitch v. Lindedahl, 100 N.J. 485, 492-93 (1985) (citing Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 575 (1982)). … Co. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Downs v. Mayor, C., South Amboy

    116 N.J.L. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Corrigan

    72 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1905

    I think it should be held that under .this act county *66 boards of election are lawful entities, and hence capable of being constituted by de facto members. Flaucher v. … Camden, 27 Vroom 244 . .Such boards, even if the members were illegally appointed, are competent to perform all acts for which boards composed of persons lawfully chosen would be competent. Dugan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Humphrey

    74 N.J.L. 255 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

    The declaration sets out that the plaintiff prosecutes for the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hunterdon, but fails to disclose any authority conferred upon him for the purpose, and the first ground of demurrer … L. 1903, p. 547), which provides that “if the board of chosen freeholders of any county * * * shall fail to prosecute any claim or demand of such county, * * * any court in *256 which an action on such claim or demand is

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hopewell Valley Citizens' Group, Inc. v. Berwind Property Group Development Co.

    204 N.J. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 2011

    Citing Brunetti v. … In 1975, in Brunetti v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • McCarter v. McKelvey

    78 N.J.L. 3 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1909

    In the case of Varney v. … Barker v. People, 3 Cow. 686 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rohrs v. Zabriskie

    102 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1926

    Manning v. Hauge, 128 Atl. … The power to issue a writ of mandamus is a discretionary one (Jones Co. v. Guttenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58; O’Hara v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.

    102 N.J. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1986

    N.J.S.A. 59:4-2; N.J.S.A. 59:2—3(d); see Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 578 (1981). The extent of the public entity’s culpability beyond ordinary negligence is the critical factor in the statutory scheme. … See Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 170-71 (1984); Soler v. Castmaster, 98 N.J. 137, 153 (1984).

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Ruiz v. MeroCited 52 timesPublished
  • Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of Franklin

    233 N.J. 127 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brookdale Homes, Inc. v. Johnson

    126 N.J.L. 516 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1941

    Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 ; 234 Pac. Rep. 381 ; 38 A. L. R. 1479. In Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co., 193 Iowa 1096 ; 184 N. W. Rep. 823 ; 23 A. L. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504; Mansfield & Swett, Inc., v. West Orange, supra. In Brown v. Board of Appeals, 327 Ill. 644 ; 159 N. E. Rep. 225; 56 A. L.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Stas

    212 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 2012

    That distinction was illustrated in State v. James Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 610-14 , 573 A.2d 886 (1990). In James Brown , two defendants racing on a highway were alleged to have killed a third driver. … Lawrence Brown, supra, 190 N.J. at 158-59, 919 A.2d 107 ; James Brown, supra, 118 N.J. at 616 , 573 A.2d 886 .

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Nutley Sun Printing Co., Inc.

    36 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1961

    Trades Council v. Garmon, 353 *194 U. S. 26, 77 S. Ct. 607 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 618 (1957). But in some circumstances the Board may reject jurisdiction. 29 U. S. C. … Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U. S. 177, 187 , 61 S. Ct. 845 , 85 L. Ed. 1271, 1279 (1941).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Herbert v. City of Atlantic

    87 N.J.L. 98 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 19, 1915

    This being so the conclusion reached by the board, upon well settled principles, ijill not be disturbed. In Reilly v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Jersey City, 64 N. J. L. 508, Mr. … Dodd v. Camden, 56 N. J. L. 258.” Other cases to the same effect are Devault v. Camden, 48 Id. 433; Ayers v. Newark, 49 Id. 170; Cavanagh v. Police Commissioners, 59 Id. 412; Alcutt v. Police Commissioners, 66 Id. 173.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hankinson v. Inhabitants of the City of Trenton

    51 N.J.L. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889

    Keeler v. Milledge, 4 Zab. 142; Doughty v. Conover, 13 Vroom 193 . … This board is erected under the provisions of “An act to-establish an excise department in cities in this state,” approved April 8th, 1884 (Pamph.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gauer v. Essex County Division of Welfare

    108 N.J. 140 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1987

    Under the law counties are authorized to abolish welfare boards. State v. County of Hudson, supra, 161 N.J.Super. at 44 . … E.g., Uricoli v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen’s Retirement System, 91 N.J. 62, 72 (1982); Masse v. Board of Trustees, Pub. Employees Retirement Sys., 87 N.J. 252, 260 (1981); Geller v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • McKim v. Village of South Orange

    133 N.J.L. 470 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1945

    Justice Trenchard for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Eckert v. West Orange, 90 N. J. … The ordinance of the board and its actions thereunder will be set aside, with costs to the prosecutor.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In Re Bd. of Fire Commrs., Fire Dist. No. 3, Piscataway

    27 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1958

    Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.J. 229, 234 (1952); Hackensack Water Co. v. Ruta, 3 N.J. 139, 147 (1949); Long Branch Commission v. Tintern Manor Water Co., 70 N.J. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 11 N.J. 43, 50, 51 (1952). As the Board noted in applying the statute in the earlier case of Middletown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.