Case law

Rohrs v. Zabriskie

102 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1926

Manning v. Hauge, 128 Atl. … The power to issue a writ of mandamus is a discretionary one (Jones Co. v. Guttenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58; O’Hara v.

Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. State

14 N.J.L. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1834

Cited in Browning v. Cooper, 3 Harr. 197 ; Morrel v. Fearing, Spencer, 671; State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 414; State v. Howell, 4 Zab. 520 ; Camden v. Mulford, 2 Dutch. 55; State v. Browning, 4 Dutch. 561; State v. … Brown, 2 Vr. 357 .

Drill v. Bowden

4 N.J. Misc. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1926

In Re Bd. of Fire Commrs., Fire Dist. No. 3, Piscataway

27 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1958

Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.J. 229, 234 (1952); Hackensack Water Co. v. Ruta, 3 N.J. 139, 147 (1949); Long Branch Commission v. Tintern Manor Water Co., 70 N.J. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 11 N.J. 43, 50, 51 (1952). As the Board noted in applying the statute in the earlier case of Middletown v.

First Church of Christ v. Bd. of Adjust., Newark

128 N.J.L. 376 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1942

It is argued by appellant that the Newark ordinance is within the doctrine of Schnell v. Ocean (Supreme Court), 120 N. J. L. 194, but that is not so. The ordinance in Schnell v. … It was held that this was property delegated to the adjustment board under subdivision 4 of section 9 of the Zoning Act, Pamph. L. 1928, p. 698; R. S. 1937, 40:55-39, et seq. This finding is approved and adopted by us.

In Re Application of Domako

9 N.J. 443 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1952

In DeSanto v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 17 N. J. Super. 44 (App. … The grant or denial of parole rests within the proper judgment of the Parole Board and is in no sense a judicial function. C f. White v. Parole Board of State of N. J., 17 N. J. Super. 580, 586 (App. Div. 1952).

Tanis v. County of Passaic

126 N.J.L. 303 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1941

Vide Buren v. Albertson, 54 N. J. L. 72; Thompson v. Board of Education of Borough of Elmer, 57 Id. 628; Jefferson v. Board of Education of the City of Atlantic City, 64 Id. 59; Stockton v. … Board of Education, 88 Id. 530; Schwarzrock v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 90 Id 370; Board of Education of Borough of Beach Haven v. State Board of Education, 115 Id. 364.

American B. D. Co. v. House of Seagrams, Inc.

56 N.J. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1970

Comany v. House of Seagrams, Inc. and in National Wine & Liquor Co. v. House of Seagrams, Inc. are affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 107 N. J. Super. 264 (App. … The judgments in Flagstaff Liquor Co. v. Browne-Vintners Company, and in Joeli Wine Distributors, Inc. v.

Crossley v. St. Philip Neri

74 N.J.L. 653 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

O’Connor as president of the board of trustees of the church, and one signed by John A. Sheppard, vicar-general, as acting president of the board. Four of the notes were payable to the order of Rev. … Martin v. Webb, 110 U. S. 7 ; Stokes v. New Jersey Pottery Co., 17 Vroom 237 , 242. The judgment under review should be affirmed.

Longridge Builders v. Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp.

52 N.J. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1968

See Lake Intervale Homes, Inc v. Parsippany-Troy Hills, 28 N. J. 423, 441-443 (1958). … The Legislature carefully has circumscribed the power of planning boards by requiring that the power be exercised in conformity with standards set forth by ordinance. N. J. S. A. 40 :55-1.14, 1.15. 2 See Levin v.

Nuckel v. LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BD.

208 N.J. 95 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 2011

Riggs v. … In Razberry's, Inc. v.

Tyrell v. Burke

110 N.J.L. 225 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1933

That such is the law of this state, regardless of what it may be in other jurisdictions, is clear from the cases of Valentine v. Englewood, 76 N. J. L. 509, in this court, and Johnson v. … There can be no doubt that under the eighth section of the act creating the board, chapter 156 of the laws of 1927, page 299, it was its duty to issue a license to such applicant as should upon examination satisfy the board

In Re Camden County

170 N.J. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 2002

See Walker v. … See e.g., Deane v.

In Re the Revocation of the License of Polk

90 N.J. 550 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1982

See Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 77-78 (1978); Brennan v. United Hatters, 73 N.J.L. 729, 742-43 (E. & A. 1906); In re Pennica, 36 N.J. 401, 419 (1962). … V The final issue that we address concerns the appropriateness of the sanction imposed by the Board.

Verona, Inc. v. Mayor and Council of Borough of West Caldwell

49 N.J. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 1967

A municipality may deny the Board of Adjustment power to approve by itself special exceptions and may limit the authoritjr of the board to recommendations to the governing body for that body’s final approval. Schmidt v. … Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of Paramus, 34 N. J. 406, 415 (1961); cf. Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N. J. 226, 236 (1956), and Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Township, 9 N. J. 64, 75 (1952).

Rockhill v. Township of Chesterfield

23 N.J. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1957

Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952). … Kane v. Board of Appeals of City of Medford, 273 Mass. 97 , 173 N. E. 1 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1930); Strain v. Mims, 123 Conn. 275 , 193 A. 754 (Sup. Ct. Err. 1937); Stone v. Cray, 89 N. H. 483, 200 A. 517 (Sup. Ct. 1938).

Woodside Homes, Inc. v. Town of Morristown

26 N.J. 529 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1958

J. p. 189) The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies has been invoked in favor of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners in the case of Junction Water Co. v. Riddle, 108 N. J. Eq. 523 (Ch. 1931). … Eq. at pages 526, 527) Compare Ward v. Keenan, 3 N. J. 298 (1949); Nolan v. Fitzpatrick, 9 N. J. 477 (1952); Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Neeld, 26 N. J. 172 (1958); R. R. 4:88-14.

Wilson v. City of Long Branch

27 N.J. 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1958

Berman v. Parker, 348 U. S. 26 , 75 S. Ct. 98 , 99 L. Ed. 27 (1954); Sorbino v. City of New Brunswick, 43 N. J. Super. 554 (Law Div. 1957); Redfern v. Board of Com’rs of Jersey City, 137 N. J. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504.

Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v. Spence

17 N.J. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 20, 1954

Blackman v. Iles, 4 N. J. 82, at page 89 (1950), and the cases cited there. … Haythorn v. Van Keuren & Son, 79 N. J. L. 101 (Sup. Ct. 1909); City of Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 133 N. J. L. 202 (Sup. Ct. 1945).

Seidman v. Clifton Savings Bank

205 N.J. 150 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 2011

.”); Lawson Mardon Wheaton v. … Compare Lanzet v.