Case law

Burroughs v. Village of Ridgewood

110 N.J. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1988

Jersey City Supply Co. v. Mayor of Jersey City

71 N.J.L. 631 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1905

As was said in the Supreme Court, in Cory v. … proposition decided in Car Spring and Rubber Co. v.

Crossley v. St. Philip Neri

74 N.J.L. 653 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

O’Connor as president of the board of trustees of the church, and one signed by John A. Sheppard, vicar-general, as acting president of the board. Four of the notes were payable to the order of Rev. … Martin v. Webb, 110 U. S. 7 ; Stokes v. New Jersey Pottery Co., 17 Vroom 237 , 242. The judgment under review should be affirmed.

Crothers v. Caroselli

126 N.J.L. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1941

One of them is, Horneman v. Brown, 286 Mass. 65 ; 190 N. E. Rep. 735. Here the practice, which we say is not permissible, was approved. … There can be no uncertainty as to the attitude of this court in’ this direction, Max v. Max, 123 N. J. L. 580; affirmed, 125 Id. 271, which is flatly opposed to Horneman v. Brown and Posner v. Nutkis, supra.

In Re Spagnoli

89 N.J. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 11, 1982

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that JAMES V. … is hereby adopted and that JAMES V.

The Midland Park Coal, C., Inc. v. Terhune

136 N.J.L. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1948

Edwards v. Derrickson, 28 N. J. L. 39, 45. … In Gabrielson v.

Wilson v. City of Long Branch

27 N.J. 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1958

Berman v. Parker, 348 U. S. 26 , 75 S. Ct. 98 , 99 L. Ed. 27 (1954); Sorbino v. City of New Brunswick, 43 N. J. Super. 554 (Law Div. 1957); Redfern v. Board of Com’rs of Jersey City, 137 N. J. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504.

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark

118 N.J.L. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1937

Newark v. New Jersey State Board of Tax Appeals and Broadbank Corp., 118 N. J. L. 131; 191 Atl. Rep. 843 . … In one, Long Branch v. State Board of Taxation, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 734; 180 Atl.

Jones v. Mayor of Morristown

66 N.J.L. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

Evernham v. Hulit, 16 Vroom 53 ; Hendrickson v. Fries, Id. 555; Dobbins v. Northampton, 21 Id. 496; Allen v. Township of Bernards, 28 Id. 303; Cooper v. Springer, 36 Vroom 594 . … Day v. Morristown, 33 Vroom 571 .

Herbert v. City of Atlantic

87 N.J.L. 98 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 19, 1915

This being so the conclusion reached by the board, upon well settled principles, ijill not be disturbed. In Reilly v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Jersey City, 64 N. J. L. 508, Mr. … Dodd v. Camden, 56 N. J. L. 258.” Other cases to the same effect are Devault v. Camden, 48 Id. 433; Ayers v. Newark, 49 Id. 170; Cavanagh v. Police Commissioners, 59 Id. 412; Alcutt v. Police Commissioners, 66 Id. 173.

Gauer v. Essex County Division of Welfare

108 N.J. 140 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1987

Under the law counties are authorized to abolish welfare boards. State v. County of Hudson, supra, 161 N.J.Super. at 44 . … E.g., Uricoli v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen’s Retirement System, 91 N.J. 62, 72 (1982); Masse v. Board of Trustees, Pub. Employees Retirement Sys., 87 N.J. 252, 260 (1981); Geller v.

Morgan v. Morgan

50 N.J. Eq. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892

In 1865 the homestead was burned,, but James R. boarded with his foreman part of the time. Then-he moved into the premises formerly occupied by the overseer.. … The decree is reversed. *479 For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clem- . .ent, Krueger—11. For affirmance—None.

Gilborges v. Wallace

78 N.J. 342 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 18, 1978

Two recent decisions by this Court, Malloy v. State, 76 N. J. 515, 522 n. 2 (1978) and State v. Garfole, 76 N. … Cucci v. Jaldini, 141 N. J. Super. 297, 300 (App. Div. 1976).

Hankinson v. Inhabitants of the City of Trenton

51 N.J.L. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889

Keeler v. Milledge, 4 Zab. 142; Doughty v. Conover, 13 Vroom 193 . … This board is erected under the provisions of “An act to-establish an excise department in cities in this state,” approved April 8th, 1884 (Pamph.

Rohrs v. Zabriskie

102 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1926

Manning v. Hauge, 128 Atl. … The power to issue a writ of mandamus is a discretionary one (Jones Co. v. Guttenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58; O’Hara v.

Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. State

14 N.J.L. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1834

Cited in Browning v. Cooper, 3 Harr. 197 ; Morrel v. Fearing, Spencer, 671; State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 414; State v. Howell, 4 Zab. 520 ; Camden v. Mulford, 2 Dutch. 55; State v. Browning, 4 Dutch. 561; State v. … Brown, 2 Vr. 357 .

Drill v. Bowden

4 N.J. Misc. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1926

In re the Application to Confirm an Assessment for the Construction of a Sewer in the Passaic

54 N.J.L. 156 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

Warner v. Hoagland, 22 Vroom 62 . … Warner v. Hoagland, ubi supra; Randolph v. Wood, 20 Vroom 85; S. C., 21 Id. 175 ; Mortland v. Christian, 23 Id. 521.

In Re Bd. of Fire Commrs., Fire Dist. No. 3, Piscataway

27 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1958

Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.J. 229, 234 (1952); Hackensack Water Co. v. Ruta, 3 N.J. 139, 147 (1949); Long Branch Commission v. Tintern Manor Water Co., 70 N.J. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 11 N.J. 43, 50, 51 (1952). As the Board noted in applying the statute in the earlier case of Middletown v.

Guggenheim v. City of Long Branch

80 N.J.L. 246 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1910

Union v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, 48 Vroom 178 ; Colonial Trust Co. v. Scheffey (Per Curiam, 69 Atl. Rep. 455 ) ; Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization, 49 Vroom 302 . … Eq. 279; Valentine v. Valentine, 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 400; Watkinson v. Watkinson, 2 Robb. 632 ; Firth v. Firth, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 137. In Watkinson v.