Case law

Unadilla Silo Co. v. Hess Bros.

123 N.J. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1991

Arzonico v. Board of Educ., 75 N.J.L. 21, 22 , 69 A. 450 (Sup.Ct.1907). … Brown Lumber Co., 104 Ohio App. 507, 509 , 150 N.E.2d 485, 487 (1957); American Bldgs. Co. v.

Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc.

147 N.J. 510 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1997

Accord Steinmetz v. … See, e.g., Donnell v.

Jones v. MacDonald

33 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1960

DeFeo v. Smith, 17 N. J. 183, 188 (1955). Defendant appears to urge the doctrine is not offended because the office of councilman is local whereas his office in the county board, as held in Warren v. … Hence in DeFeo v. Smith, supra, the doctrine was applied although the officer was a member of the county tax board and a member of the county board of chosen freeholders. *136 In DeFeo (17 N.

State v. Heppenheimer

54 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1892

Evening Journal Association v. State Board of Assessors, 18 Vroom 36 ; Standard Underground Cable Co. v. Attorney General, 46 N. J. Eq. 270; Honduras Commercial Co. v. State Board of Assessors, ante p. 278. … It is argued, however, that, because in State v. Branin, 3 Zab. 484; State v. Bentley, 3 Id. 532, and State v.

Romano v. Village of Ridgewood

14 N.J. Misc. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1936

Boyle v. Donohoe

14 N.J. Misc. 48 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1935

This is a companion case to O’Connell v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Bayonne, 116 N. J. L. 61. The causes were consolidated by stipulation of counsel.

Browne v. Bayonne Trust Co.

118 N.J.L. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 13, 1937

Browne, if he is living, to conduct my funeral.” … Biczis v. Public Service, 115 N. J. L. 407, and cases cited. The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Lutjen v. Lutjen

64 N.J. Eq. 773 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

In Gifford’s Administrator v. … In Brown v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 5 Stew.

Trask v. State

32 N.J.L. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1865

Browning and B. Williamson, for plaintiffs in error, and E. W. Soudder and F. T. Frelinghuysen, Attorney-General, for defendant. … These trusts are *489 reposed in each keeper, and in each board of inspectors. The trust is committed to them to be executed according to their judgment and cannot be delegated to others.

First National Bank v. Perth Amboy Iron & Metal Co.

119 N.J. Eq. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1936

Moore v. Richardson, 68 N. J. Law 305; Hirsch v. C. W. Leatherbee Lumber Co., 69 N. J. Law 509; Terry v. Munger, 121 N. Y. 161 ; 24 N. E. Rep. 272; 8 L. R. A. 216; Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. … Justice Allen, in Cooper v.

Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey City

60 N.J.L. 141 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1897

In Stuhr v. Curran, 15 Vroom 181 , this court had the matter under consideration. … Meehan v. Freeholders, &c., 17 Vroom 276 . This result I deem to be in entire accord with the doctrine of Stuhr v.

Wurtzel v. Falcey

69 N.J. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1976

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278 , 39 L.Ed. 2d 714, 723 (1974). Ballot regulations necessarily affect the franchise, which is a fundamental right, Harper v. … Brown, 409 U.S. 809 , 93 S.Ct. 69 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 71 (1972), aff'g mem., 341 F. Supp. 1187 (S.D. Ohio 1972); Manson v. Edwards, 482 F. 2d 1076, 1077 (6 Cir.1973); Whitehead v.

Zicherman v. Driscoll

133 N.J.L. 586 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1946

L. 254; Paul v. Gloucester, 50 Id. 585; Voight v. Board of Excise, 59 Id. 358; Meehan v. Excise Commissioners, 73 Id. 382; affirmed, 75 Id. 557. No licensee has vested right to the renewal of a license. … Allen v. City of Paterson, 98 Id. 661; Fonarotto v. Public Utility Commissioners, 105 Id. 28. We find no such abuse.

English v. College of Medicine and Dentistry of NJ

73 N.J. 20 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1977

Schlenk v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 1 N. J. 131, 135 (1948). Accord, Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 25 N. J. 541, 554 (1958). The same situation had existed with respect to public employees. In Zimmerman v. … Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 , 92 S. Ct. 2694 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 570 (1972); Williams v. Civil Service Commission, 66 N. J. 152, 157-158 (1974); Donaldson v. Bd. of Ed. of No. Wildwood, 65 N. J. 236, 239-240 (1974).

State v. Agnesi

92 N.J.L. 53 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1918

The principle on which the right of self-defence rests and the limitations of that right have been settled by the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in Brown v. State, 62 N. J. L. 666, 702. … In Brown v.

Robert Dublirer v. 2000 Linwood Avenue Owners, Inc. (069154)

220 N.J. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 2014

State v. Schmid, 84 N.J. 535, 560 (1980). Schmid, and later N.J. Coal. Against War in the Middle East v. J.M.B. … See State v.

Beirn v. Morris

14 N.J. 529 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 8, 1954

Ct. 1945); Garden View Homes, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic, 137 N. J. L. 44 (Sup. Ct. 1948); Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken, 3 N. J. 494, 495 (1950); Lumund v. … Brandon v. Montclair, cited supra Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken, cited supra; Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952); V. F. Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v.

In Re Weston

36 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 18, 1961

The requirements of such minimum examination shall be defined by rule or regulation of the New Jersey State Board of Optometrists." In Abelson's, Inc. v. … Judge (now Justice) Francis in New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. Koenigsberg, 33 N.J. Super. 387, 391 ( App.

New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co. v. Mayor of Jersey City

64 N.J.L. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1900

Ahrens v. Fiedler, 14 Vroom 400 . … Keeney v. Jersey City, 18 Id. 449 ; Cory v. Freeholders, 15 Id. 445 . The question of the liability of the city to pay for the ■goods covered by the last two bills is raised by different proof.

Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Florham Park v. UTICA MUT. INS.

172 N.J. 300 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 2002

Zacarias v. Allstate Ins. Co., 168 N.J. 590, 595 , 775 A.2d 1262 (2001). … Holloway v. State, 125 N.J. 386, 399 , 593 A.2d 716 (1991); see also United N.Y. Sandy Hook Pilots Ass’n v.