Case law

Ludwigsen v. New Jersey Department of Labor

12 N.J. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 30, 1953

J. 287, 290 (1950); Muraski v. Board of Review, etc., 136 N. J. L. 472 (Sup. Ct. 1948). … Grant Co. v. Board of Review, etc., 129 N. J. L. 402 (Sup. Ct. 1943); Muncie Foundry Division of Borg-Warner Corp. v. Review Board of Employment Security Division, 114 Ind. App. 475 , 51 N. E. 2d 891 (App. Ct. 1943).

Graybar Electric Co. v. Manufacturers Casualty Co.

21 N.J. 517 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1956

V, par. 3; R. R. 1:5-4; City of *524 Asbury Park v. Department of Civil Service, 17 N. J. 419, 423 (1955). Cf. State v. Catalano, 30 N. J. Super. 343, 348 (App. Div. 1954). … See Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Storr, supra; Newman v. Maryland Casualty Co., supra.

Myers v. Cedar Grove Tp.

36 N.J. 51 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 6, 1961

Corb v. Board of Health of Town of Nutley, 101 N.J.L. 50 ( Sup. Ct. 1925). … Undoubtedly, it was aware that autonomous boards of health were not "essential" in Walsh Act municipalities. Corb v. Board of Health of Town of Nutley, supra; Larkey v. City of Bayonne, 123 N.J.L. 134 ( Sup.

Huppert v. Hague

2 N.J. Misc. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1924

We think this case is controlled by the rules and principles laid down by Ignaciunas v. Risley, 1 N. J. Adv. R. 1023, and, -under the authority thereof, an alternative writ of mandamus should issue.

Cullum v. Bd. of Education of Tp. of North Bergen

15 N.J. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 1954

opinion reported in Cullum v. … Whipple v. Christie, 122 Minn. 73 , 141 N. W. 1107 (Sup. Ct. 1913); Board of Education, etc. v. Stevens, 261 Ky. 475 , 88 S. W. 2d 3 (Ct. App. 1935). See also Hicks v. Long Branch Commission, 69 N. J.

State v. Gray

59 N.J. 563 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 20, 1971

As the defendant removed his gloves, the officer noticed that they were mismatched, one was brown and the other black. The brown glove, which was on the defendant’s right hand, had a slit in it. … As the officer “went to pick the gloves up the brown glove with the slit in it, there was a brown manila envelope starting to slide out of the glove when [he] picked them up.”

Mason v. City of Paterson

62 N.J. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1973

Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Florham Park v. UTICA MUT. INS.

172 N.J. 300 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 2002

Zacarias v. Allstate Ins. Co., 168 N.J. 590, 595 , 775 A.2d 1262 (2001). … Holloway v. State, 125 N.J. 386, 399 , 593 A.2d 716 (1991); see also United N.Y. Sandy Hook Pilots Ass’n v.

Kuzmicz v. Ivy Hill Park Apartments, Inc.

147 N.J. 510 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1997

Accord Steinmetz v. … See, e.g., Donnell v.

NYT Cable TV v. Homestead at Mansfield, Inc.

107 N.J. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1987

Doe v. Hopewell Valley Reg'l Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

231 N.J. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 26, 2017

Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point Pleasant

112 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1988

State v. Butler, 89 N.J. 220, 226 (1982). … Hutton Park Gardens v. Town Council of W. Orange, 68 N.J. 543, 563 (1975); Lane Distributors, Inc. v. Tilton, 7 N.J. 349, 365 (1951).

Woolley v. Flock

92 N.J.L. 65 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 25, 1918

We may paraphrase thus what was said in Smith v. … The cases of Bilderback v. Freeholders of Salem, 63 N. J. L. 55, and Young v. Stafford, 86 Id. 422, are also in point.

In Re the Suspension or Revocation of the License of Fichner

144 N.J. 459 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1996

In Ryder v. … In Fifth Street Pier Corp. v.

Masse v. State

85 N.J. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1980

Glick v. Trustees of Free Public Library

2 N.J. 579 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1949

Giordano v. City Commission of Newark, decided this day by this court. 2 N. J. 585. The petition for certification is denied. The petitioner made no appearance in the court below. … commission/ “board of street and water commissioners/ “board of public works/ “board of finance/ “board of health/ “park commissioners/ “recreation commissioners/ or otherwise.”

State v. Leonardis

73 N.J. 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1977

In Brown v. Heymann, 62 N. … In discussing our power to review decisions of the Parole Board, we held in Monks v. N. J. State Parole Board, 58 N.

New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Bell

81 N.J. Eq. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1913

Jones v. MacDonald

33 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1960

DeFeo v. Smith, 17 N. J. 183, 188 (1955). Defendant appears to urge the doctrine is not offended because the office of councilman is local whereas his office in the county board, as held in Warren v. … Hence in DeFeo v. Smith, supra, the doctrine was applied although the officer was a member of the county tax board and a member of the county board of chosen freeholders. *136 In DeFeo (17 N.

Khan v. Singh

200 N.J. 82 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 2009

Irving Ratner, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, as his expert. … We have permitted the doctrine to be applied in plaintiffs favor in a variety of factual settings, including the collapse of a stairway in a new building on which a plaintiff was standing, Brown v.