Case law

In Re Application of Saddle River

71 N.J. 14 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1976

See e.g., Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 96 N.J.L. 184 (E. & A. 1921) (water); Edison Storage Battery Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 93 N.J.L. 301 (Sup. … Co. v. Public Utility Board, 92 N.J.L. 168, 175 (E. & A. 1918), app. dism. 254 U.S. 660 , 41 S.Ct. 10 , 65 L.Ed. 462 (1920); O'Brien v. Public Utility Board, 92 N.J.L. 44, 46 (Sup.

Francis v. Harris

53 N.J. 227 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1969

Wharton v. Knox

51 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1968

Weinacht v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen

3 N.J. 364 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1949

Schnyder v. McGovern

2 N.J. Misc. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1924

The two writs bring up an order for the holding of a special election for determining whether certain municipalities of Hudson county shall be consolidated, and procedure taken by the county board of elections in preparation

In Re PSE & G Shareholder Litigation

173 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 2002

One prior case, Escoett v. … See Hart v.

Bd. of Education Bernards Tp. v. Bernards Tp. Ed. Assn.

79 N.J. 311 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1979

J. 98 (1978), and Ridgefield Park Education Ass’n v. Ridgefield Park Board of Education, 78 N. J. 144 (1978). … See Board of Educ. of Edison Twp. v. Edison Twp. Educ. Ass’n, 161 N. J. Super. 155 (App. Div. 1978); Education Ass’n of Passaic v. Passaic Bd. of Educ., 166 N. J. Super. 250 (App.

Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor Township

89 N.J. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1982

Maier v. Champion, 97 N.J.L. 493, 495 (E. & A. 1922); Albey v. Weingart, 71 N.J.L. 92, 93 (Sup.Ct.1904); Steffens v. Earl, 40 N.J.L. 128, 137-38 (Sup.Ct.1878). … We are satisfied that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in overturning the Board decision and determining the appropriate rents. See Henry v.

Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc.

180 N.J. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 2004

[FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct 1291, 1300 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121, 134 (2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).] … See Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir.1994), superseded by statute on other grounds stated by Disabled Am. Veterans v. Gober, 234 F.3d 682 (Fed.Cir.2000), rehearing denied (2001).

In Re Boardwalk Regency Corp. Casino License

90 N.J. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 21, 1982

Rabbino, Jr., members of the New York bar, and Morris Brown and Brian J. Molloy, of counsel). … See Ballou v. State Department of Civil Service, 75 N.J. 365, 370-71 (1978); State v. Krol, 68 N.J. 236, 248 (1975).

165 Augusta Street, Inc. v. Collins

9 N.J. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1952

V. F. Zahodiakin, etc., Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment, Summit, 8 N. J. 386 (1952); Home Builders Ass’n. of Northern N. J. v. Paramus, 7 N. J. 335, 341-342 (1951); Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of Borough of Rutherford, 4 N. … Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Township of Ocean, supra; Home Builders Ass’n. of Northern N. J. v. Paramus Boro., supra (at p. 343).

Wollen v. Borough of Fort Lee

27 N.J. 408 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1958

Compare Pyatt v. Mayor & Council of Borough of Dunellen, 9 N. J. 548 (1952); Aldom v. Borough of Roseland, 42 N. J. Super. 495 (App. Div. 1956). IV. … Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1953); Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumont, 15 N. J. 238 (1954), these among others of like tenor.

Place v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER

42 N.J. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1964

Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Furman, 41 N. J. 467, 477 (1964). … Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of Adjustment, 31 N. J. 58 (1959); Ardolino v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Florham Park, 24 N. J. 94 (1957).

Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON

11 N.J. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1953

L. 639 (E. & A. 1948); Cassinari v. City of Union City, 1 N. J. Super. 219 (App. Div. 1949); Vine v. Zabriskie, 1 22 N. J. L. 4 (Sup. Ct. 1939); Kerrigan Development Co. v. City of Newark, 2 N. J. … Subdivision (d) authorizes the local board to recommend to the governing body of the municipality the granting of a variance in particular cases and for special reasons. See Ward v. Scott, 11 N. J. 117 (1952).

Fobe Associates v. Mayor and Council of Demarest

74 N.J. 519 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1977

In Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Adjustment, 30 N. … See Rain or Shine Box Lunch Co. v. Newark Board of Adjustment, 53 N. J. Super. 252, 259 (App. Div. 1958) ; Yahnel v. Board of Adjustment, Jamesburg, supra, 79 N. J. Super., at p. 519.

Town of Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, Department of Taxation & Finance

137 N.J.L. 634 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 1948

Jersey City, 122 Id. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 19 N. J. Mis. R. 313; Haworth v. State Board, of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 67; Prudential Insurance Com *636 pany of America v. … Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra; Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra.

Ryerson v. Marseillis

16 N.J.L. 450 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1838

s, of great value &c. that the defendant, falsely, &c. well knowing the contrary, represented to the plaintiff, that the horse which the defendant thus proposed to exchange for the horse of the plaintiff, was, a certain brown … This is in conformity with the decision of this Court in Sherron v. Humphreys, 2 Green, 221. Let the Judgment be Reversed.

State v. Silva

131 N.J. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1993

State v. Brown & Emm, 118 N.J. 595, 613 , 573 A.2d 886 (1990). … Bryant, supra, 523 A. 2d at 465 ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 11 Mass.App.Ct. 288 , 416 N.E.2d 218, 224 (1981); People v.

In re Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders Council 71 & Local 2307

93 N.J. 240 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1982

Arbuckle v. Kelly

78 N.J.L. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 6, 1909

After, as before the passage of the act of 1905, the keeper of the common jail was the appointee of the sheriff, and did not hold his position under the board of chosen freeholders. The ease of Cavenaugh v. … That case was decided upon the assumption that the board of chosen freeholders of Essex was the custodian of the jail, and that Cavanaugh was its appointee. The .decision of Virtue v.