Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.99s

  • Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)

    221 N.J. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 2015

    An organization that is an applicant or objector in a proceeding before a local board clearly has an interest in the outcome of that proceeding. See, e.g., Sugarman v. … use- variance application); Landau v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.

    13 N.J. 447 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 2, 1953

    Board of Review, supra; Valenti v. Board of Review, supra. … Valenti v. Board of Review, supra.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Buck v. Henry

    207 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 22, 2011

    Buck v. Henry, 203 N.J. 432 , 3 A.3d 1223 (2010). II. … Ryan v. Renny, 203 N.J. 37, 52 , 999 A.2d 427 (2010).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Renny

    203 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 2010

    V. … Ferreira v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc.

    180 N.J. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 2004

    [FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct 1291, 1300 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121, 134 (2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).] … See Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir.1994), superseded by statute on other grounds stated by Disabled Am. Veterans v. Gober, 234 F.3d 682 (Fed.Cir.2000), rehearing denied (2001).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Divan Builders v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Wayne

    66 N.J. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1975

    The trial court granted summary judgment for plaintiff, Divan Builders, Inc. v. Wayne Planning Board, 122 N. J. Super. 508 (Law Div. 1973), and the Appellate Division affirmed, Divan Builders, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Colonial Oaks West, Inc. v. East Brunswick Tp., 61 N. J. 560 (1972); Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Princeton Planning Board, 52 N. J. 348 (1968); Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany- Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Ridgway v. Executors of English

    22 N.J.L. 409 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1850

    J., 6 Halst. 164; Kinder v. Pavis, 2 H. Bl. 562; Browning v. Pavis, 5 M. & W. 120; Hickman v. Walker, Willes 27 ; Steph. Pl. 410; Gould 453; 2 Saund. 63, note; 2 Stark. Ev. 670, (Phil. 1842). … Cited in Brown v. Ramsay, 5 Dutch. 121; Betts v. Francis, 1 Vr. 155 ; Sutton v. Huffman, 3 Vr. 64 ; Updyke v. Ten Broeck, 3 Vr. 115 ; Horner v. Webster, 4 Vr. 411 ; Coley v. Coley, 1 McCar. 353; Prickett v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. Borough of North Arlington

    9 N.J. 167 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 24, 1952

    Compare Newark v. Fischer, 8 N. J. 191, 199 (1951). … Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals, supra (at p. 166).

    Cited 115 timesPublished
  • State v. Mayor of Jersey City

    58 N.J.L. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

    In Lanning v. Lanning, 2 C. E. … Board of Finance v. Jersey City, 28 Vroom, 452 . In the same case it was held that, by the fourteenth section of the act of March 28th, 1891 (Pamph.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Grundlehner v. Dangler

    29 N.J. 256 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1959

    Board of Commissioners of City of Newark, supra, 139 N. J. L. at page 338. In McMahon v. … And in Amero v. Board of Appeal of *270 City of Gloucester, 283 Mass. 45 , 186 N.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON

    11 N.J. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1953

    L. 639 (E. & A. 1948); Cassinari v. City of Union City, 1 N. J. Super. 219 (App. Div. 1949); Vine v. Zabriskie, 1 22 N. J. L. 4 (Sup. Ct. 1939); Kerrigan Development Co. v. City of Newark, 2 N. J. … Subdivision (d) authorizes the local board to recommend to the governing body of the municipality the granting of a variance in particular cases and for special reasons. See Ward v. Scott, 11 N. J. 117 (1952).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ELIZABETH v. City of Elizabeth

    13 N.J. 589 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1953

    Green v. Heritage, 64 N. J. L. 567; Tennessee Central Railroad [Co.] v. Campbell, 109 Tenn. 640 .” … Nothing we have said here impinges on the holding in Townsend v. State Board of Education, 88 N. J. L. 97 (Sup. Ct. 1915), and in Board of Education of Long Branch v. Board of Commissioners of Long Branch, 2 N. J.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • DeFeo v. Smith

    17 N.J. 183 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1955

    Clawson v. Thompson, 20 N. J. L. 689 (Sup. … Kobylarz v. Mercer, supra; Tonkin v. Kenworthy, 112 N. J. L. 274 (Sup. Ct. 1933); Wescott, Attorney-General v. Scull, 87 N. J. L. 410 (Sup. Ct. 1915); Lofland v. Hilton, 80 N. J. L. 528 (Sup. Ct. 1910).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Lubliner v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON., CITY OF PATERSON

    33 N.J. 428 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1960

    A. 40:55-39) which was dealt with in Russell v. Board of Adjustment of Tenafly, supra, 31 N. J. 58, R. … See, e. g., Curry v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Margate City, Bulletin 472, Item 7; Asbury Park Licensed Beverage Association v. City Council of City of Asbury Park, Bulletin 911, Item 3; cf. R. S. 33:1-32.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Railroad v. Department of Public Utilities

    14 N.J. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1954

    See Lakewood Express Service v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs., 1 N. J. 45, 49 (1948); California v. Thompson, 313 U. S. 109, 113 , 61 S. Ct. 930 , 85 L. Ed. 1219, 1221 (1941); Southern Pacific Co. v. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., supra; Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 13 N. J. Super. 540, 545 (App. Div. 1951), affirmed 8 N. J. 85 (1951).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • City of Newark v. Fischer

    3 N.J. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 16, 1950

    Supreme Court Reports, 1121, at 1126; George v. Bekins, 189 P. 2d 301 (Calif. Dist. Ct. of App. 1948). The basic contention of the City is that the County Board was in error in cancelling the assessment. … We are in accord with the doctrine which is stated in George v.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Pfenninger v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School

    167 N.J. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 2001

    Kelly v. Gwinnell, 96 N.J. 538, 548 , 476 A.2d 1219 (1984). Traditionally, courts have determined the circumstances under which a defendant owes a legal duty to another. Carvalho v. … See Handleman v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State v. Silva

    131 N.J. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1993

    State v. Brown & Emm, 118 N.J. 595, 613 , 573 A.2d 886 (1990). … Bryant, supra, 523 A. 2d at 465 ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 11 Mass.App.Ct. 288 , 416 N.E.2d 218, 224 (1981); People v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • State v. Demeter

    124 N.J. 374 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1991

    Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). The Court clarified the elements of that doctrine in Texas v. … Brown and Arizona v.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Heil v. Mayor

    11 N.J. Misc. 171 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1933

    By resolution of the mayor and board of commissioners the salary was reduced to $1,200. The writ brings up this resolution. … The latter statute we considered in Adams v. Plainfield, 109 N. J. L. 282; 161 Atl. Rep. 647 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.