Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Johnston v. Bowers

    69 N.J.L. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1903

    Harrison v. Vreeland, 9 Vroom 366 ; Brown v. Warden, 15 Id. 177; Metzger v. Credit System Co., 30 Id. 340; Snyder v. Merchants Insurance Co., 30 Id. 69; Voorhees v. Barr, Id. 123; Melick v. … Brown ads. Hendrickson, 10 Id. 239; McAdams v. Randolph, 13 Id. 332; Brookfield v. Hughson, 15 Id. 285; Schautz v. Kearney, 18 Id. 56.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Tennant v. City of Jersey

    123 N.J.L. 200 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939

    Jersey City v. State Water Policy Commission, 118 N. J. L. 72, 77; Dana College v. State Board, &c., 117 Id. 530; West Shore Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 112 Id. 83; Angelotti v. … Montclair, 109 Id. 360; Kohn v. Tilt, 103 Id. 110; Collingswood v. Water Supply Commission, 85 Id. 567; Yellow Pine Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 72 Id. 182; Moran v. Jersey City, 58 Id. 653.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Black v. Town of Montclair

    34 N.J. 105 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1961

    Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Adjustment, supra, 30 N. J., at p. 249; Lubliner v. Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control for City of Paterson, 33 N. J. 428, 446 (1960). … See Ward v. Scott, supra, 16 N. J. 16; Grundlehner v. Dangler, supra, 29 N. J. 256; Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Adjustment, supra, 30 N. J. 245.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Istvan v. Naar

    84 N.J.L. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1913

    See Board of Health v. Railroad Company, 48 Vroom 15 . The convictions will be set aside. … In Bakeley v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Application of Saddle River

    71 N.J. 14 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1976

    See e.g., Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 96 N.J.L. 184 (E. & A. 1921) (water); Edison Storage Battery Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 93 N.J.L. 301 (Sup. … Co. v. Public Utility Board, 92 N.J.L. 168, 175 (E. & A. 1918), app. dism. 254 U.S. 660 , 41 S.Ct. 10 , 65 L.Ed. 462 (1920); O'Brien v. Public Utility Board, 92 N.J.L. 44, 46 (Sup.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Ramsbotham v. Bd. of Public Works, Paterson

    2 N.J. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1949

    Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N. J. L. 230, 239 (Sup. Ct. 1945). The statutory intent is succinctly stated in Brandon v. … Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N. J. L. 1, 3 (Sup. Ct. 1941); Sitgreaves v. Board of Adjustment of Nutley, 136 Id. 21, 26 (Sup. Ct. 1947).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Loewenthal v. Wagner

    68 N.J.L. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

    Except .upon a direct attack to set it aside or amend it, the return is conclusive against the sheriff (Hustick v. Allen, Coxe 168; Browning v. Flanagin, 2 Zab. 567, 574; 22 Am. & Eng. Encyl. … Chapman v. Cumming, 2 Harr. 11 ; Browning v. Flanagin, ubi supra; 22 Am. & Eng. Encycl. L. 193.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.

    87 N.J. 146 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1981

    Upon leaving the tavern, Stewart *150 walked a short distance from the tavern entrance and then fell on the sidewalk abutting a vacant boarded lot adjacent to Ernie’s Tavern. … Brown v. Brown and State of New Jersey, 86 N.J. 565 (1981) (State liable for palpably unreasonable failure to maintain drainage ditch along highway); Milstrey v.

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)

    221 N.J. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 2015

    An organization that is an applicant or objector in a proceeding before a local board clearly has an interest in the outcome of that proceeding. See, e.g., Sugarman v. … use- variance application); Landau v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.

    13 N.J. 447 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 2, 1953

    Board of Review, supra; Valenti v. Board of Review, supra. … Valenti v. Board of Review, supra.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Atkinson v. Parsekian

    37 N.J. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1962

    There were only two witnesses at the hearing, Trooper Brown and Ralph. The trooper testified he arrived at the accident scene twenty minutes after the collision. … National Labor Relations Board, 340 U. S. 474 , 95 L. Ed. 456 (1951); see N. J. Bell Tel. Co. v. Communications Workers, etc., 5 N. J. 354, 378 (1950); Hornauer v.

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Buck v. Henry

    207 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 22, 2011

    Buck v. Henry, 203 N.J. 432 , 3 A.3d 1223 (2010). II. … Ryan v. Renny, 203 N.J. 37, 52 , 999 A.2d 427 (2010).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Renny

    203 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 2010

    V. … Ferreira v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of Rutherford

    4 N.J. 577 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1950

    Board of Com’rs. of Town of Montclair, supra, and reasserted by this court in National House & Farms Ass’n., Inc., v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Oakland, supra, and Ramsbotham v. … Sitgreaves v. Board of Adjustment of Nutley, 136 N. J. L. 21 (Sup. Ct. 1947).

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • DeFeo v. Smith

    17 N.J. 183 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1955

    Clawson v. Thompson, 20 N. J. L. 689 (Sup. … Kobylarz v. Mercer, supra; Tonkin v. Kenworthy, 112 N. J. L. 274 (Sup. Ct. 1933); Wescott, Attorney-General v. Scull, 87 N. J. L. 410 (Sup. Ct. 1915); Lofland v. Hilton, 80 N. J. L. 528 (Sup. Ct. 1910).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc.

    180 N.J. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 2004

    [FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct 1291, 1300 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121, 134 (2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).] … See Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir.1994), superseded by statute on other grounds stated by Disabled Am. Veterans v. Gober, 234 F.3d 682 (Fed.Cir.2000), rehearing denied (2001).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Divan Builders v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Wayne

    66 N.J. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1975

    The trial court granted summary judgment for plaintiff, Divan Builders, Inc. v. Wayne Planning Board, 122 N. J. Super. 508 (Law Div. 1973), and the Appellate Division affirmed, Divan Builders, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Colonial Oaks West, Inc. v. East Brunswick Tp., 61 N. J. 560 (1972); Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Princeton Planning Board, 52 N. J. 348 (1968); Reid Development Corp. v. Parsippany- Troy Hills Tp., 10 N.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Ridgway v. Executors of English

    22 N.J.L. 409 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1850

    J., 6 Halst. 164; Kinder v. Pavis, 2 H. Bl. 562; Browning v. Pavis, 5 M. & W. 120; Hickman v. Walker, Willes 27 ; Steph. Pl. 410; Gould 453; 2 Saund. 63, note; 2 Stark. Ev. 670, (Phil. 1842). … Cited in Brown v. Ramsay, 5 Dutch. 121; Betts v. Francis, 1 Vr. 155 ; Sutton v. Huffman, 3 Vr. 64 ; Updyke v. Ten Broeck, 3 Vr. 115 ; Horner v. Webster, 4 Vr. 411 ; Coley v. Coley, 1 McCar. 353; Prickett v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lubliner v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON., CITY OF PATERSON

    33 N.J. 428 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1960

    A. 40:55-39) which was dealt with in Russell v. Board of Adjustment of Tenafly, supra, 31 N. J. 58, R. … See, e. g., Curry v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Margate City, Bulletin 472, Item 7; Asbury Park Licensed Beverage Association v. City Council of City of Asbury Park, Bulletin 911, Item 3; cf. R. S. 33:1-32.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • State v. Mayor of Jersey City

    58 N.J.L. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

    In Lanning v. Lanning, 2 C. E. … Board of Finance v. Jersey City, 28 Vroom, 452 . In the same case it was held that, by the fourteenth section of the act of March 28th, 1891 (Pamph.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.