Case law

In Re Application of Greenville Bus Co.

17 N.J. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 20, 1954

Lines v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs., 5 N. J. 114 (1950). … Power & Light Co. v. Borough of Butler, supra; Atlantic City R. R. Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs., supra; Eastern N. J. Power Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs., 6 N. J. Misc. 118 (Sup. Ct. 1928). Cf.

UCJF v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.

138 N.J. 185 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1994

Co. v. Coven, 264 N.J. Super. 240, 245-46 , 624 A. 2d 594 (App.Div. 1993); Range v. McLarty, 246 N.J. Super. 196, 199 , 586 A. 2d 1364 (Law Div. 1990); Buoni v. Browning Ferres Indus., 219 N.J. … See also Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board, 213 N.J.

Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and Dispensary

79 N.J. 549 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1979

Thus, the hospital board of trustees has been vested with the responsibility of attempting to elevate standards of medical care. See Greisman v. Newcomb Hosp., 40 N. J. 389, 403 (1963). In Doe v. Bridgeton Hosp. … In this respect it must be remembered that a hospital board is vested with a broad managerial discretion to seek improvement in medical care. Justice Jacobs in Greisman v.

Steinmann v. State, Dept. of Treasury

116 N.J. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 7, 1989

[Geller v. Department of the Treasury, 53 N.J. 591, 597-98 (1969) (citation omitted) (emphasis added).] Estate of Hagel v. Board of Trustees, 226 N.J.Super. 182, 186 (App.Div.1988); see also Fiola v. … See Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, 113 N.J. 180 (1988); Maynard v. Board of Trustees, 113 N.J. 169 (1988); Kane v. Board of Trustees, 100 N.J. 651 , 498 A.2d 1252 (1985); and Cattani v.

Francis v. Harris

53 N.J. 227 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1969

Wharton v. Knox

51 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1968

Weinacht v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen

3 N.J. 364 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1949

Gougeon v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR

52 N.J. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1968

Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Board of Adjust., Leonia, 52 N. J. 22 (1968) : Wilson v. Borough of Mountainside, 42 N. J. 426, 452 (1964) ; Griffin Const. Corp. v. Board of Adjust., Teaneck, 85 N. J. Super. 472, 476-477 (App. … Harrington Glen, Inc v. Board of Adjust., Leonia, supra.

Dickinson v. Mayor of Jersey City

68 N.J.L. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

Smith, 28 Vroom 526 ; Water Commissioners v. Cramer, 32 Id. 270; Horan v. Lane, 24 Id. 275. … Avon v. Neptune City, 28 Vroom 701 ; West Jersey Traction Co. v. Camden, 29 Id. 362; Smalley v.

Wilson v. Township Committee of Union

123 N.J.L. 474 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1939

Alexander v. Rekoon,, 104 N. J. L. 1; McKenna v. Harrington Co., 96 N. J. Eq. 700; Wilson v. Trenton, 53 N. J. L. 645. … What the board did in this case was, in our view, in harmony with the finding of this court in Am,on v.

Protomastro v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF HOBOKEN

3 N.J. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1950

McFeely v. Board of Pension Commissioners, 1 N. J. 212. … Berdan v. City of Paterson, 1 N. J. 199 (Sup. Ct. 1948).

Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance

34 N.J. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1961

Brown. The plaintiff testified that at that time his “whole right side, the leg and right arm shook” and that Dr. Brown’s treatment was “about the same as Dr. Manrodt.” … See Howe v. National Life Ins. Co., 321 Mass. 283 , 72 N. E. 2d 425 , 170 A. L. R. 1254 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1947); Brown v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 336 Mass. 609 , 147 N. E. 2d 160 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1958); cf.

Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Township of Ocean

9 N.J. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 14, 1952

Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200, 206 (1949); State v. Mundet Cork Corp., 8 N. J. 359 (1952); Welsh v. Morristown, 98 N. J. L. 630, 634 (Sup. Ct. 1923), affirmed 99 N. J. … Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200, 206 (1949); State v. Mundet Cork Corp., 8 N. J. 359 (1952); Brandon v. Montclair, supra (124 N. J. L. at p. 149).

Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. State Bd. Tax Appeals

109 N.J.L. 395 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1932

The state board of taxes and assessment was succeeded by the state board of tax appeals, under an.actt approved April 14th, 1931, and the latter board, after hearing this complaint, dismissed it upon the grounds that the … L. 1915, p. 438), there was established, by consolidation of the state board of assessors and the board of equalization of taxes of New Jersey, the state board of taxes and assessment, with all of the duties and powers of

Griggs v. Borough of Princeton

33 N.J. 207 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1960

Zell v. Borough of Roseland, supra, where a member of a planning board voted on a matter affecting a church of which he was but a member, causing the appellate court to invalidate the planning board’s action. … Winans v. Crane, 36 N. J. L. 394, 399 (Sup. Ct. 1873).

Schear v. City of Elizabeth

41 N.J. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1964

Reilly v. Ozzard, supra, 33 N. J., at p. 550; Alto v. Weaver, supra (39 N. J., at p. 423). The Legislature has prescribed the composition of the Planning Board. L. 1953, c. 433, § 4. N. J. S. … The Legislature is presumed to be aware of this status and consequently to have sanctioned such membership on the board. Clifton v. Zweir, 36 N. J. 309, 323, 324 (1962); State v. Federanko, 26 N. J. 119, 129 (1958).

Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of Randolph

137 N.J. 216 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 28, 1994

In Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. … See also Phillips v.

Manning v. Hague

3 N.J. Misc. 329 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 26, 1925

Said Lewis was secretary of the zoning board. … If these were all the matters requiring our consideration It might well be that the situation would be controlled by Ignaciunas v. Risley, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 852.

Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy Hills

13 N.J. 172 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1953

S. 18:7-4, Landis v. School District 44, 57 N. J. L. 509 (Sup. … In Mines v. DelValle, 201 Cal. 273 , 257 P. 530, 537 (Cal. Sup.

Ervolini v. County of Camden

127 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1941

Haythorn v. Van Keuren, 79 N. J. L. 101; Foley v. Orange, 91 Id. 554. … That was the test laid down in Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N. J. L. 771, 786; Burlington v. Pennsyl *476 vania Railroad Co., 104 Id. 649, 654, and Delmar v.