Case law

Belleville Chamber of Commerce v. Town of Belleville

51 N.J. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1968

See Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of Belleville, 117 N.J.L. 1 ( Sup. Ct. 1936); Barton Trucking Corp. v. O'Connell, 7 N.Y. 2 d 299, 165 N.E. 2 d 163, 197 N.Y.S. 2 d 138 (1959); Brunacini v. … See Moyant v. Paramus, supra, 30 N.J., at pp. 552-554; Weiner v. Borough of Stratford, County of Camden, 15 N.J. 295, 299 (1954); Hoboken v. Bauer, 137 N.J.L. 327, 329 ( Sup. Ct. 1948); cf. Brown v.

In Re the Closing of Jamesburg High School

83 N.J. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1980

See Fahey v. Jersey City, 52 N.J. 103, 107 (1968); Duke Power Co. v. Patten, 20 N.J. 42,49 (1955); Imbriacco v. … See Board of Trustees of Mercer Cty. College v. Sypek, 160 N.J.Super. 452, 462 (App.Div.), certif. den., 78 N.J. 327 (1978).

Paruszewski v. Township of Elsinboro

154 N.J. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1998

Relying on Township of Dover v. Board of Adjustment, 158 N.J.Super. 401 , 386 A.2d 421 (App.Div.1978), and Zoning Bd. of Adjustment v. … Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 296-97 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965).

Northwest Bergen County Utilities Authority v. Kathleen A. Donovan (075060)

226 N.J. 432 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 15, 2016

V. … Nicoletta v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm’n, 77 N.J. 145, 150-51, 390 A.2d 90 (1978); see also Siss v.

In Re Opinion 452 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

87 N.J. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 1981

See, e. g., Ahto v. Weaver, 39 N.J. 418, 431 (1963); Opinion 300; Opinion 277; Opinion 29; Opinion 4. But see DeLuca v. … See Higgins v. Advisory Comm. on Professional Ethics, supra, 73 N.J. at 129 .

State v. Schultz

46 N.J. 254 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1966

See State v. Fioravanti, 46 N. J. 109 (1965); State v. Davis, 45 N. J. 195 (1965); State v. Aviles, 45 N. J. 152 (1965); State v. Lanzo, 44 N. J. 560 (1965); State v. Garvin, 44 N. J. 268 (1965). … State v. Brown, 46 N. J. 96 (1965). The judgments are affirmed. For affirmance — Chief Justice WeintBatjb and Justices Eeastoir, Pboctob, Hall and Hanemait — 5.

Kaufmann v. Planning Bd. for Warren Tp.

110 N.J. 551 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1988

We granted certification to review the petitions of the applicant and the Planning Board. 108 N.J. 580 (1987). *557 II In three recent cases, Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1 (1987), Davis Enterprises v. … Plaintiffs recognize that expert testimony is not required in all instances to sustain a board finding. Tomko v. Vissers, 21 N.J. 226, 238 (1956); see also Kunzler v.

DeNike v. Bd. of Trustees, Employees Ret. System of NJ

34 N.J. 430 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1961

See Leltieri v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 24 N. J. 199 (1957). Although Schack v. Trimble, 28 N. … Holloway v. Pennsauken Twp. [12 N. J. 371] ; McKenna v. New Jersey Highway Authority [19 N. J. 270] ; Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc. [26 N. J. 246], all supra.

Alpaugh v. Conkling

88 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 4, 1915

In Noice v. … Justice Depue'(on p. 563), pointed out that in Hoice v. *67 Brown it was the injury to property rights which gave to the suit the quality of survivorship. It would seem, therefore, that Noice v.

ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Livingston

51 N.J. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1968

Place v. Board of Adjust, of Borough of Saddle River, 42 N. J. 324, pp 331-332 (1964). See Ward v. Scott, 11 N. J. 117, 133 (1952); Bern v. Borough of Fair Lawn, 65 N. J. Super. 435, 448 (App. Div. 1961); Tzeses v. … Kunzler v. Hoffman, 48 N. J. 277 (1966); Andrews v. Board of Adjustment of Ocean Twp., 30 N. J. 245 (1959); Grundlehner v. Dangler, 29 N. J. 256 (1959).

State v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

30 N.J. 16 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1959

J. 498, at page 509; Public Service Coordinated Transport v. State, supra, 5 N. J. 196, at page 217; Atlantic City Sewerage Co. v. Board Pub. Utility Com’rs., supra, 128 N. J. L. 359, at pages 365, 366.” … Public Service Coordinated Transport v. State, supra, 5 N. J., at page 217; In re New Jersey Power & Light Co., supra, 9 N. J., at page 510.” (New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utilities, Board Pub.

Collerd v. Tully

78 N.J. Eq. 557 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1911

He says, in discussing the question whether the horses sold by Brown to Tully were upon a conditional sale: “Some of the horses died after they were delivered to Tully, but this fact was ignored by Brown in his account. … S. § 304; American Soda Fountain Co. v. Vaughan, 69 N. J. Law (40 Vr.) 582, cited with approval by this court in American Soda Fountain Co. v. Stoltzenbach, 75 N. J. Law (46 Vr.) 721 (at p. 724).

Wooley v. Campbell

37 N.J.L. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1874

The King v. Montague, 4 B. & C. 598; Com. v. Alger, 7 Cush. 82 ; Chalker v. Dickinson, 1 Conn. 382 . In Arnold v. … In Townsend v. Brown, 4 Zab. 80, this court gave construction to the act for the preservation of clams and oysters, (Nix.

Bunk v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

144 N.J. 176 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 1996

In Brown v. … In Wright v.

Tennant v. City of Jersey City

122 N.J.L. 174 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1939

of Taxation to $15,000 and was reinstated to the original figure by the State Board of Tax Appeals on an appeal taken by the city of Jersey City. … The judgment of the state board will not be disturbed on certiorari on questions of fact unless the evidence is persuasive that the board erred in its determination (Kearny v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 81 N. J.

Dolan v. DeCapua

16 N.J. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1954

S. 2A :67.á-4, shall apply to matters pending in the board of adjustment. The zoning statute provides for hearings and determinations of a quasi-judicial nature before the board of adjustment. Cf. Mazza v. … In Stolz v. Ellenstein, supra, Mr.

Stolz v. Ellenstein

7 N.J. 291 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 11, 1951

In Scaduto v. … There is such authority, Cook v. Bd. of Adjustment, 118 N. J. L. 372 (Sup. Ct. 1937); Aschenbach v. Plainfield, 121 N. J. L. 598 (Sup. Ct. 1939), affirmed 123 N. J.

A. Li Gregni & Co. v. Mayor of Dover

121 N.J. 639 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1990

Harborside Warehouse Co. v. City of Jersey City

128 N.J.L. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1942

In Universal Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 118 N. J. L. 538, the correct rule was reiterated by, Mr. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 100 N. J. L. 131; Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Tax Assessors, 86 Id. 592. The State Board of Assessors under Pamph.

C.A.L. v. State of New Jersey

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 2026

While that appeal was pending, the Appellate Division decided K.G. v. State Parole Board, 458 N.J. Super. 1 (App. … Super. at 13 (quoting J.I. v. State Parole Board, 228 N.J. 204, 224 (2017)).