Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

2.55s

  • In the Matter of Petition for Rulemaking to Amend N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.11, N.J.A.C. 10A:71-2.2, and N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.20

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 2026

    See Thompson v. State Parole Bd., 210 N.J. Super. 107, 123 (App. Div. 1986). … Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 488 (1980) (quoting Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Ocean Castle, No. 11, Knights of the Golden Eagle

    59 N.J.L. 198 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

    Hinchman v. Cook, Spen. 271; Welsh v. Brown, 13 Vroom 323 . … Tidd Prac. 1137; 2 Saund. 101 z; Anonymous, Penn. *753; note to Gardner v. State, 1 Zab. 561; Welsh v. Brown, ubi supra.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    171 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 2002

    There is merit in adopting these Texas v. Brown requirements to establish the plain view exception. … Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at 742 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 513 -14 (quoting United States v.

    Cited 110 timesPublished
  • Central Railroad v. Department of Public Utilities

    7 N.J. 247 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1951

    Lakewood Express Serv. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs., 1 N. J. 45 (1948). … That court, in Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Board, 84 N. J. L. 463, 466 (Sup.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Harvester Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elbaum

    119 N.J.L. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

    R. 849; Chodosh v. Schlesinger (Circuit Court, 1936), 14 Id. 599. … Justice Lloyd in the case of Deal Park Co. v. Bannard, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 194.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of Franklin

    233 N.J. 104 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals

    2 N.J. 157 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1949

    Jersey City v. State Water Policy Commission, 118 N. J. L. 72 (E. & A. 1937); Dana College v. State Board, etc., 117 Id. 530 (E. & A. 1937); West Shore R. R. Co. v. … There are two unreported former Supreme Court decisions, Pusey and Jones Co. v. State Board (Sup. Ct. 1921) and Scott v. Board of Equalization of Taxes (Sup.

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Scowcroft v. Civil Service Commission

    13 N.J. Misc. 448 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1935

    In fact, as the service of but one employe was required, it was the board’s prerogative, if not indeed its duty, to fill the office created by statute. … While Furlong was designated by the jury commission as secretary of that body, it was with the approval of the board of freeholders, formally expressed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Linker v. Bd. of Education, Collingswood

    102 N.J.L. 248 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1926

    Relator contracted with the board of education to erect a building, presumably a school building, and it appears by the writ, whose averments are admitted by the demurrer, that there was due to relator, subject to claims … Against this fund were lodged stop-notices aggregating $24,936.27, and the board withheld that amount to answer the stop-notices and paid the balance to relator.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ippolito v. Borough of Ridgefield

    94 N.J.L. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 8, 1920

    In Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, 79 N. J. … This contention is well answered by the Supreme Court of Indiana, in construing a similar statute in Board of Com'rs v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Colsey

    63 N.J. 210 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1973

    Respondent sought to obtain planning board approval. The negotiations were quite extended. … That bank account was respondent’s individual account and not the account of the law firm in which he was a partner. 3 The cash sums of $6,500 and $8,500 were placed by respondent in a brown envelope, and respondent again

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of Paramus

    34 N.J. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1961

    And see Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N. J. 405 (1952). … As has been said, the governing body may draw its own ultimate conclusions from the facts adduced before the board. Tomko v. Vissers, supra, 21 N. J., at p. 236; Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Township, 9 N.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Neptune v. NEPTUNE TP. ED. ASSOC.

    144 N.J. 16 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 1996

    Ass’n v. Board of Educ., 451 A.2d 1156, 1163-64 (Del.Ch.1982); Board of Trustees of Univ. of Me. v. *23 Associated Colt Staff of Univ. of Me. System, 659 A.2d 842 (Me.1995); Appeal of Milton Sch. … See Romanoli v. Board of Educ., 1984 N.J.Sch.L.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • United Cigar Stores Co. of America v. State Tax Commissioner

    10 N.J. Misc. 761 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1932

    We are clear that the decision of the state board was right, and think that the full and careful opinion of President Weaver in the similar case of North American Co. v. … The state board relied on that opinion in deciding the present ease (55 N. J. L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Public Service, C. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comrs.

    131 N.J.L. 226 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1944

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of the Certificates of Nicholas Cilento, State Board of Examiners, New Jersey Department of Education

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 2025

    The Commissioner upheld the Board’s decision. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed, relying on the analysis and holding of Morison v. Willingboro Board of Education, 478 N.J. Super. 229 (App. … The Appellate Division rejected Cilento’s challenge, relying on the detailed analysis and sound reasoning set forth in Morison v. Willingboro Board of Education, 478 N.J. Super. 229 (App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bennie Anderson (084365) (Mercer County & Statewide)

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 11, 2021

    Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 327 (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 265 (1989)). … Ct. at 687-88 (alteration in original) (emphasis added) (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 271 (1989)); accord Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 335-36.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Bd. Freeholders, Monmouth Co.

    104 N.J.L. 185 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1927

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woolverton v. Van Syckel

    57 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

    Hemmingway v. Stone, 7 Mass. 58 ; Brown v. Fitch, 4 Vroom 418 ; Chaffee v. Jones, 19 Pick. 263 . … For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Bogert, Brown, .Green, Krueger, Sims, Smith. 12.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of Harrison

    122 N.J.L. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1939

    LaRosa v. Nichols, 92 N. J. L. 375; Central Railroad Co. v. MacCartney, 68 Id. 165. … McCue v. Silcox, 122 N. J. L. 12; Smith v. National Commercial Title, &c., Co., 120 Id. 75; 21 C. J. 1115.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.