Case law

Visco v. City of Plainfield

136 N.J.L. 659 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1948

Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N. J. L. 230. … Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, supra. The presumption in favor of the validity of the particular zone regulation has not been overthrown.

Spoerl v. Township of Pennsauken

14 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1954

Perth Amboy Trust Co. v. Board of Aldermen of the City of Perth Amboy, 75 N. J. L. 291 (Sup. Ct. 1907); City of Omaha v. Megeath, 46 Neb. 502 , 64 N. W. 1091 (Sup. Ct. 1895); Browne v. Palmer, 66 Neb. 287 , 92 N. … In Jamouneau v. Local Government Board, 6 N. J. 281 (1951), we said: “The city may not give away revenues not yet approved any more than it may give away revenues now due. Jersey City v. North Jersey Street R.

Stahlin v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

125 N.J.L. 211 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 1, 1940

See Traphagen v. Erie, 73 N. J. L. 759; Feil v. West Jersey, 77 Id. 502. But there was no such motion. Point Y challenges the admission of a certified copy of testimony before the Board of Steamboat Inspectors. … Schroeder v. Public Service Railway Co., *219 118 Atl. Rep. 337 (not officially reported), and cases cited: Brown v. Public Service Railway Co., 98 N. J. L. 747; 121 Atl. Rep. 612 ; McLaughlin v. Damboldt, 100 N. J.

Green v. Bell Cleaners

35 N.J. 596 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 23, 1961

After spending nearly an hour in the parked truck in front of the liquor store where the whiskey was bought, they set off for Lomax’s home in Browns Mills. When they were near *600 Browns Mills the accident happened. … See Robinson v. Federal Telephone & Radio Corp., 44 N. J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1957); Cole v. Borough of Keansburg, 17 N. J. Misc. 380 (C. P. 1939).

State v. Echols

199 N.J. 344 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 2009

In his second statement to the police, Jones identified defendant as the man accompanying Brown as they fled from Powell’s apartment. Defendant and Brown were arrested on September 8, 1994. … State v. Preciose, 129 N.J. 451, 460 , 609 A.2d 1280 (1992). In State v.

Lowe v. Zarghami

158 N.J. 606 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1999

Murray v. Brown, 259 N.J.Super. 360, 365 , 613 A.2d 502 (Law Div.1991). … V.

State v. Lutz

135 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1947

State v. Garton, 102 N. J. L. 318; Weeks v. State, 101 Id. 15; Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U. S. 616 ; 32 S. Ct. 583 ; 56 L. Ed. 917 . … It was he, the witness said, who wore the brown tweed topcoat.

Berzito v. Gambino

63 N.J. 460 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1973

Pines v. Perssion, 14 Wis. 2d 590 , 111 N. W. 2d 409 (1961); Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 A. 2d 834 (D. C. App. 1968); Lemle v. Breeden, 51 Haw. 426 , 462 P. 2d 470 (1969); Javins v. … For affirmance — Hone. 1 A similar approach to this problem was taken in Academy Spires, Inc. v. Brown, 111 N. J. Super. 477 (Cty. Dist. Ct. 1970) and in Samuelson v. Quinones, 119 N. J. Super. 338 (App.

Cherokee LCP Land, LLC v. City of Linden Planning Bd.

234 N.J. 403 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 2018

(the Board). … People For Open Gov't v. Roberts , 397 N.J. Super. 502 , 508, 938 A.2d 158 (App. Div. 2008) (citing Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp.

Rosell v. Buck

62 N.J.L. 575 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1898

Kirkpatrick, Receiver, v. State Board, 28 Vroom 53 . The prosecutor must be regarded as the mortgagor or owner with the right in a proper case to demand deduction. … Vail’s Executors v. Runyon, 12 Vroom 99; Appleby v. East Brunswick, 15 Id. 153 .

State v. Rosenfeld

62 N.J. 594 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1973

The defendant testified that he was twenty-five years of age, was graduated from Brown University, had done graduate work elsewhere, and planned to attend law school. … Lifton, “The Young and The Old,” The Atlantic (September 1969), pp. 48, 50-52; see also Papish v. The Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 464 F. 2d 136, 146 (8 Cir. 1972) (dissenting opinion); Duke v.

Daniels v. Watson

11 N.J. Misc. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1933

When *183 the claim was originally made the defendant knew that the claimant was Brown and that Brown was the real party in interest. … Wildes v. Mairs, 6 N. J. L. 320; Bell v. Morris Canal Co., 15 Id. 63. In Force v. Carr, 9 N. J. L. J. 311, Mr.

Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.

28 N.J. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1959

See Crotty v. Driver Harris Co., 49 N. J. Super. 60, 69 (App. Div. 1958); Buerkle v. United Parcel Service, 26 N. J. Super. 404, 407 (App. Div. 1953); Waskevitz v. Clifton Paper Board Co., 7 N. J. Super. 1, 3 (App. … In Brown v.

In re Devlin

109 N.J. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 15, 1988

This is an attorney-disciplinary case in which the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) determined that respondent, Harry N. … In re Brown, 102 N.J. 512, 517 (1986).

Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.

45 N.J. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1965

The decisions in Mocco v. Job, 56 N. J. Super. 468 (App. Div. 1959); Whitehead v. Kearny Zoning Board of Adjustment, 51 N. J. Super. 560 (App. Div. 1958); and Skaf v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Asbury Park, 35 N. J. … Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Ad justment, supra.

Mundy v. Township of Raritan

7 N.J. Misc. 78 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 3, 1929

Stat., p. 5801 (board of conservation and development being constituted under Pamph. L. 1915, p. 428, § 5; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. … L. 1910, p. 551, supra, and the proceeding was one controlled by Oakland v. Board of Conservation and Development, 98 N. J. L. 806.

Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co. v. Duryee

116 N.J.L. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1935

That is a clear deduction from the reasoning of Chief Justice Hughes in the “hot-oil” cases (Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, and Amazon Petroleum Corp. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388 ; 79 L. Ed. 223 ; 55 Sup. … Justice Heher in State Milk Control Board v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504.

Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGE

16 N.J. 329 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 25, 1954

Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 N. J. L. 576 (Sup. Ct. 1936); Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 N. J. L. 28 (Sup. Ct. 1936); Phi Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. … Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 5 N. J. 454 (1950).

Murphy v. Bd. Chosen Freeholders, Bergen Co.

110 N.J.L. 9 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 19, 1932

As was said in the case of Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 N. J. … As was stated by the present Chief Justice in Cavanaugh v. Board of Freeholders, 58 N. J.

State v. KAVANAUGH

52 N.J. 7 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 29, 1968

This was made clear in Cooper v. … See State v. Van Duyne, 43 N.