Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.85s

  • Division of Rate Counsel, Department of Public Advocate v. Board of Public Utilities, Department of Energy

    85 N.J. 150 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Mundet Cork Corp.

    8 N.J. 359 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1952

    State v. Brenner, 132 N. J. L. 607, 611 (E. & A. 1945); Perrine Terrace Land Co. v. Brennan, 101 N. J. L. 487, 490 (Sup. Ct. 1925); Board of Health v. Werner, 67 N. J. L. 103, 104 (Sup. … City Affairs Committee v. Jersey City, supra; Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of West New York, 133 N. J. L. 220, 225 (Sup. Ct. 1945); Township of Dover v. Wilt, 7 N. J. Super. 259 (App.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Pinto v. Bd. of Trs., Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.

    231 N.J. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 8, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Angelini v. Bd. of Trs.

    230 N.J. 591 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DREW ASSOCIATES OF NJ, LP v. Travisano

    122 N.J. 249 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1991

    Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989). The Cooperative Recording Act does not involve a suspect or semi-suspect class, nor does it affect a fundamental right. … Brown v. City of Newark, supra, 113 N.J. at 574 , 552 A.2d 125 . Drew contends that the Act fails to meet the rational-basis standard in light of its stated purposes.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Korelnia v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUB. EMPLOYEES'RETIREM. SYS.

    83 N.J. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1980

    Gerba v. Board of Trustees, PERS, supra, 83 N.J. at 186-187 . … Cattani v. Board of Trustees, PERS, supra, 69 N.J. at 586 .

    Criticized in part by Maynard v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 (1988)Cited 26 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Building, Loan & Investment Co. v. Cumberland Land & Improvement Co.

    53 N.J. Eq. 644 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

    The board of directors was alone capable to execute that function, and there is nothing to show that the terms of the contract, as claimed by the defendant, were ever communicated to that body. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Van Syckel, Brown, Krueger, Smith, Talman — 10. For affirmance — None.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delorenzo v. Newark

    134 N.J.L. 7 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1946

    Bader v. Crone, 116 N.J.L. 329 ; Salley v. Firemen's and Policemen's Pension Fund, 124 Id. 79 . … Judson v. Newark Board of Works Pension Association, 132 N.J.L. 106 ; affirmed, 133 Id. 28 . The judgment below will be affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    121 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1990

    See, e.g., Dewey v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, supra, 225 N.J.Super. at 378 n. 2, 542 A.2d 919 . … The quoted language has limited applicability, however, in view of the presumption in favor of federal preemption where the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is involved. Brown v.

    Cited 135 timesPublished
  • Bd. Education of Seaside Heights v. Shepherd

    119 N.J.L. 413 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

    The appeal is from a judgment in the Supreme Court affirming the findings by the state board of education that Isaiah A. … Moran v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 653; Suburban Land Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311; Kohn *414 v. Tilt, 103 Id. 110.” Ford Moror Co. v. Fernandez, 114 N. J. L. 202, 204.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Emery v. Van Syckel

    17 N.J. Eq. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1867

    In the case of Lee v. Prieaux, 3 Brown C. … The words nearest analogous to those in this will, are in the case of Lee v. Prieaux, 3 Brown C. C. 311; “ their receipts in writing, respectively, shall be a sufficient discharge.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hannaford v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.

    115 N.J.L. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1935

    Tested by that rule the testimony was admissible as a part of the res gesta (Murphy v. Brown & Co., 91 N. J. L. 412; State v. … Tn the case of Adam Black & Son v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Burns

    51 N.J.L. 340 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1889

    The gang of which plaintiff was one had boarded the train at Jersey City, under the immediate conduct of the gang boss, and had by his direction entered the car indicated by the gateman. … For affirmance — The Chanoellqr, Chief Justice, Garrison, Enapp, Mague, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marvin Safe Co. v. Ward

    46 N.J.L. 19 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884

    Marshall v. York R. R. Co., 11 C. B. 655; Austin v. G. I. P R. R. Co., L. R., 3 Exch. 9; Whart. Neg., § 439; Dicey on Parties 19. Dalyell v. … In Hyams v. Webster, L. R., 2 Q. B. 264, the defendant, under a contract with the metropolitan board, opened a public highway for the purpose of constructing a sewer.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Gallop

    85 N.J. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1981

    District IX Ethics Committee issued a presentment and the Disciplinary Review Board agreed substantially with its findings. … Bolte v. Rainville, 138 N.J.Eq. 508 (E. & A.1946).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Matter of Grabler

    114 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1989

    Crispen v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 96 N.J. 336, 347 (1984). Of greater concern to the Board is the fact that, in the Leighton and Scott matters, respondent repeatedly misrepresented the status of the case to his clients. … See Contra In re Brown, 102 N.J. 512 (1986) (respondent, forced out of trust by a client’s bad check then knowingly commenced and continued a pattern of borrowing from one client to satisfy another, was disbarred); In re

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Abbott v. Burke

    193 N.J. 34 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 2007

    application of plaintiffs for an Order in aid of litigants’ rights pursuant to Rule 1:10-3 and Rule 2:8-1, And plaintiffs having sought an Order directing defendants to comply with certain specified decisions of the Court, Abbott v. … Burke, 153 N.J. 480 , 710 A.2d 450 (1998) [“Abbott V"]; Abbott v. Burke, 164 N.J. 84 , 751 A.2d 1032 (2000) [“Abbott VII”], and Abbott v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pub. Utility Constr., & G. Appliance Workers, Local 274 v. Pub. Serv. Elec. and Gas Co.

    26 N.J. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 17, 1958

    Browning King Co. of N. Y. v. Local 195, 34 N. J. Super. 13, 26 (App. Div. 1955) ; 29 U. S. C. A. § 152. And at the conclusion of the strike, ordinarily they have the right of reinstatement to their former duties. … It is fundamental that arbitration provisions in a bargaining agreement cannot oust the Board’s jurisdiction to prevent unfair labor practices. Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U. S. 1 , 77 S. Ct. 598 , 1 L.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Warren Hills Regional Educational Ass'n v. Board of Education of Warren Hills Regional High School District

    93 N.J. 308 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 21, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Leffingwell v. Kiersted

    74 N.J.L. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

    Section 3 provides that the pension fund shall be under the control of the board of trustees, consisting of the chief engineer of the fire department and “four members thereof.” … In Wheeler v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 46 La. Ann. 731 , a veterinary surgeon was held to be an officer of a fire department. In People v. Ennis, 7 N. Y. Supr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.