Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Sherman v. Borough of Harvey Cedars Zoning Board of Adjustment
122 N.J. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1990
Cited 0 timesPublishedCouncil of New Jersey State College Locals v. State Board of Higher Education
91 N.J. 18 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1982
. *23 In State v. … See Association of New Jersey College Faculties, Inc. v. Board of Higher Education, 112 N.J.Super. 237, 242-50 (Law Div.1970).
Cited 44 timesPublishedNutley-Times Square Service, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
109 N.J.L. 289 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 27, 1932
Erie Railroad Co. v. Board, 89 N. J. L. 57; affirmed, 90 Id. 672, 673; 41 Sup.Ct. 169 ; 254 U. S. 322 ; 65 Law Ed.; Penn Jersey, &c., Co. v. Camden, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 813; Peoples Rapid Transit Co. v. … L. 286; affirmed, 106 Id. 587; Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board, 278 U. S. 24 . We hardly think that the point is seriously pressed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Essex County Board of Chosen Freeholders
110 N.J. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 14, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublishedColonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. State Board of Tax Appeals
126 N.J.L. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1941
New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 Id. 596; Gannon v. … Kearny v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 81 Id. 106. See, also, Kearny v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 Id. 26; affirmed, Id. 699. So tested, the judgment under review is unassailable.
Cited 6 timesPublishedJacobs v. New Jersey State Highway Authority
54 N.J. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1969
See Brown v. Little, Brown & Co., 269 Mass. 102 , 168 N. E. 521 , 66 A. L. R. 1284 (1929); People ex rel. Tims v. Bingham, 166 N. Y. S. 28 (Sup. Ct. Spec. Term 1906). … State v. Federanko, 26 N. J. 119, 129 (1958).
Cited 44 timesPublishedBethlehem Township Board of Education v. Bethlehem Township Education Ass'n
87 N.J. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlpine Masonic Temple Ass'n v. State Board of Tax Appeals
15 N.J. Misc. 275 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1937
Tiie opinion of Newark v. Slate Board of Tax Appeals, &c., 9 N. J. Mis. R. 599; 155 Atl. Rep. 9 , states no facts on which the decision is predicated. In the case of Grand Lodge, Sons of Italy v. Blum, 10 N. J. Mis. … The reversal of local exemption by the county board may have been irregular, but we do not pass on the point as the matter was heard on the general merits before the state board and again in this court.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 N.J. 323 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1965
State v. Coolack, 43 N. J. 14, 16 (1964) ; State v. Masselli, 43 N. J. 1, 12 (1964) ; State v. Smith, 10 N. J. 84, 93 (1952) ; R. … R. 3:11-3(b). 4 Section 60 provides: “If the court shall determine that the patient is insane and has sufficient estate to pay for his full maintenance as fixed by the board of managers or board of chosen freeholders, as
Cited 41 timesPublishedPublic Service Interstate Transportation Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
127 N.J.L. 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1941
The defendants invoke the case of Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Sheldon, 95 N. J. … But the case is controlled in this respect by Hudson County Bus Owners' Association v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 1070; 143 Atl. Rep. 755 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPublic Service Co-Ordinated Transport v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
130 N.J.L. 409 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 13, 1943
Justice Garrison, speaking for this court in Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 89 N. J. … In the opinion of this court in Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 89 N. J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMillville Electric Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
3 N.J. Misc. 412 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1925
Our reading of the record leads us to the same conclusion as that filed by the board. The order so made is supported by the evidence on which it is based. *414 In the case of the Atlantic City Sewerage Co. v. … Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 84 N. J. L. 468.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Broad Building & Loan Ass'n v. Brunetto
112 N.J.L. 79 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1934
The Supreme Court sustained the Circuit Court in both aspects, relying on Shack v. Dickenhorst, 99 Id. 120; Slate v. Jersey City, 94 Id. 431, and Fletcher v. Board, 85 Id. 1. … Browne Stat. Frauds, § 505, et seq.; Whitehead v. Burgess, 61 N. J. L. 75; Wilkinson Gaddis Co. v. Van Riper, 63 Id. 394.
Cited 4 timesPublishedZigmont v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund
91 N.J. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedLemmon Co. v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
85 N.J. 148 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Bergen Action Group v. North Bergen Township Planning Board
118 N.J. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1989
Cited 0 timesPublished67 N.J.L. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902
Manahan, any more than Brown (who had qualified), was his successor. Under the rule laid down in Kilburn v. … Kilburn v. Conlan, 27 Vroom 349 ; Dugan v. Farrier, 18 Id. 383, 386; Jersey City v. Erwin, 30 Id. 282; S. C. on error, 31 Id. 141; Brinkerhoff v. Jersey City, 35 Id. 225, 229; Blore v. Freeholders, Id. 262.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBalbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
7 N.J. Misc. 231 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1929
Alton Machine Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 69 Atl. Rep. 451 ; Phonograph Co. v. Board of Assessors, 54 N. J. L. 430; Burlington Distilling Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 86 Id. 92; Edison Phonograph Co. v. Assessors, 57 Id. 520. See, also, Standard Underground Cable Co. v. Attorney-General, 46 N. J. Eq. 270, and American Glucose Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMedford Township Board of Education v. Medford Education Association
200 N.J. 365 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 6, 2009
ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in light of Mount Holly Township Board of Education v.
Cited 0 timesPublished90 N.J.L. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1917
This was the practice followed in Haight v. Love, 39 N. J. L. 14, 476; Anderson v. Myers, 77 Id. 186; Dunham v. Bright, 85 Id. 391; Civil Service Commission v. O’Neill, Id. 92; Bonynge v. Frank, 89 Id. 239. … Clay v. Civil Service Commission, 89 N. J. L. 194.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna