Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.92s
New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
91 N.J.L. 701 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 1918
Cited 0 timesPublishedPhelps v. Board of Education of Town of W. New York
116 N.J.L. 412 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936
Cited 0 timesPublishedPorto Rican American Tobacco Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation
124 N.J.L. 134 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1940
Cited 0 timesPublishedState, Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Paterson Avenue & Secaucus Road Commissioners
41 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1879
Cleveland v. Board of Finance, 9 Vroom 259 . The sixteenth section of the general road act is a familiar instance of the exercise of such power. … State v. Jersey City, 4 Zab. 662; Vantilburgh v. Shann, Id. 740; State, Wilkinson, pros., v. Trenton, 7 Vroom 499 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedTrenton & Mercer County Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation
91 N.J.L. 105 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1917
Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood, 77 N. J. L. 141. … We think the case of Long Dock Company v. State Board of Assessors, 86 N. J. L. 592, relied upon by prosecutors, is not analogous to the present situation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBOARD OF EDUC., BOROUGH OF ALPHA, WARREN CTY. v. Alpha Educ. Ass'n
188 N.J. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 21, 2006
See, e.g., D.E.I., Inc. v. … Citing Shepherd v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedT-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Township of Freehold Zoning Board of Adjustment
209 N.J. 231 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 9, 2012
36 A.3d 1065 (2012) 209 N.J. 231 T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF FREEHOLD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Nos. C-629 September Term 2011, 069496 Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 9, 2012.
Cited 0 timesPublished143 N.J. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1996
ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having on January 10, 1996, filed with the Court its decision recommending that a letter of admonition be issued to RAYMOND A. … BROWN, JR., of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, for failing to perform quarterly reconciliations of account records, in violation of Rule 1:21-6, and for using a signature stamp on trust account
Cited 0 timesPublished144 N.J. 580 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1996
ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board on January 25, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding on the basis of a disciplinary stipulation that STEPHEN D. … BROWN of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violation of RPC 3.3(a)(1) and (4) (false statement of material fact to
Cited 0 timesPublishedPaterson Tavern & Grill Owners Ass'n v. Borough of Hawthorne
57 N.J. 180 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1970
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483, 492-496 , 74 S. Ct. 686, 690-693 , 98 L. Ed. 873, 879-881 (1954)) nor did it deal with the scope of women’s ever-broadening rights to seek and obtain gainful employment. … Super, at 442; see Hargens v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 263 Cal. App. 2d 601 , 69 Cal. Rptr. 868 (Ct. App. 1968); Henson v. City of Chicago, 415 Ill. 564 , 114 N. E. 2d 778 (1953); but cf. Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNew York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
29 N.J. 513 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 20, 1959
A. 48:2—23; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Department of Public Utilities, Board of Public Utility Corners, 14 N. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 346 U. S. 868 , 98 L. Ed. 378 (1953); Terminal B. Ass’n of St. Louis v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 318 U. S. 1, 8 , 63 S. Ct. 420 , 87 L. Ed. 571 (1943); Atchison, T. & S.
Cited 4 timesPublished39 N.J.L. 707 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1877
In Post v. … Sedg. on Dam. 506; 1 Add. on Torts, ch. 7, § 3, ¶ 524; Browning v. Shillman, 4 Zab. 351; Outcalt v. Durling, 1 Dutcher 443; Adams v. O’Connor, 100 Mass. 515 ; Faulkner v. Brown, 13 Wend. 63 ; White v.
Cited 6 timesPublished89 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1916
In Wilson v. Trenton, 53 N. J. … L., p. 114) which regulated the common law defence of employers, and that this court in Brown v. Erie Railway Co., 87 Id. 487, sustained and applied chapter 35 (Pamph.
Cited 6 timesPublishedTownship of East Brunswick v. City of New Brunswick
57 N.J.L. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894
Hoxsey v. Paterson, 10 Vroom 489 ; Middleton v. Robins, 25 Id. 566. … Cooper v. De Bow, 17 Vroom 286 . Counsel for plaintiff in error incidentally argues that it was the duty of the state board, upon Such a complaint, to revise the valuations of all- the taxing districts in the county.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Board of Medical Examiners v. College of Mecca of Chiropractic
106 N.J.L. 602 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublishedWildwood Board of Education v. Webster Bright & Central Terra Cotta Co.
91 N.J.L. 579 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1918
Brown v. Bateman, 2 L. R., C. P. 272; 36 L. J., C. P. 134; Lister v. Simpson, 38 N. J. Eq. 438; 39 Id. 595. … We feel no difficulty in holding that whatever title the Rickman Construction Company had, passed to the board of education. In fact, no question was made as to that.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLambertville Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners
76 N.J. 240 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 18, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublishedTown of West New York v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
1 N.J. Misc. 63 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923
Cited 0 timesPublishedSixty-Seven South Munn, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
7 N.J. Misc. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarlyn Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of West Orange
106 N.J.L. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
The Marlyn Realty Company then appealed to the board of adjustment to review the action of the building superintendent, and the board affirmed that action. … This case in its legal aspect is identical with that of Steinberg v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna