Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.12s
40 N.J. 367 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1963
Newman v. Borough of Fair Lawn, 31 N. J. 279, 288 (1960). … See City of Clifton v. Zweir, 36 N. J. 309, 325-26 (1962).
Cited 9 timesPublishedTrustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
105 N.J.L. 655 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
This was an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the judgment or order of the state board of taxes and assessments brought to that tribunal for review on certiorari. … See Breitbart v. Lurich, 98 N. J. L. 556; Hand v. Howe, 1 N. J. Mis. R. 513; 104 N. J. L. 170.
Cited 14 timesPublishedLambertville Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners
79 N.J. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1979
However, the Appellate Division, while supporting the Board’s refusal to be bound by the 48% figure, was unable to find any rational basis for the Board’s use of a 38.9% computation. … In Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 381 A. 2d 1080 (Me. 1977), the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine had before it a statute dealing with increases in public utility rates.
Cited 4 timesPublished88 N.J. 443 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1982
V. Reddick In September, 1976, Jessie Reddick retained respondent to represent him to prosecute a divorce action. … BROWN of Teaneck be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that CALLIS N.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCarteret Academy, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals
10 N.J. Misc. 864 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1932
Elizabeth v. Cory, 73 N. J. L. 699; 65 Atl. … The order of the state board will be affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRush v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VIL. OF SOUTH ORANGE
11 N.J. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1953
RUSH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ARTHUR TZESES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 2, 1953.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNew York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 432 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1917
We think the testimony before the board was not sufficient nor of a character to warrant or reasonably support the conclusion reached by the board, and for that reason we have concluded that the permission granted should … Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Utility Commissioners, 89 N. J. L. 57; Potter v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Id. 157.
Cited 3 timesPublished81 N.J.L. 330 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1911
She did not request their return durixxg Brown’s lifetime. … Williams v. Davis, 1 Penn. 277 ; Williamson v. Wright, 2 Id. 984; Hogland v. Sebring, 1 South. 105 ; Paterson v. Schenck, 3 Gr. 434 ; Corlies v. Van Note, 1 Harr. 324 ; Worman v. Seybert, 49 Vroom 176 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of Long Branch v. State Board of Tax Appeals
116 N.J.L. 506 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936
The judgment under review, in this ease, is reversed, for the reasons stated in Town of West Orange et al. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N. J. L. 396; 180 Atl. Rep. 770 , and affirmed by this court in 116 N. J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLakewood Express Service, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
137 N.J.L. 440 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 1948
Nutley-Times Square Service v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 109 N. J. L. 289; Greenfield v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 131 Id. 361. But by chapter 125 of the Pamphlet Laws of 1946 (Pamph. … This court in effect so found in Nutley-Times Square Service v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedF. S. D. Industries, Inc. v. Board of Education
81 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublishedTrustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
105 N.J.L. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1928
As stated by this court in the case of Millville Gas Light Co. v. City of Millville, 84 N. J. … Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 101 N. J. L. 371. The Supreme Court should weigh the evidence and render such a decision as it thought proper according to the view it entertained of the evidence. Ibid.
Cited 24 timesPublishedState ex rel. Sibley v. Board of Management of Carteret Club
40 N.J.L. 295 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1878
The board of management, upon the failure, as they allege, of the relator to pay after posting, resol ved that he ceased to be a member by operation of article IV., and no declaration of forfeiture was passed by the board … Until the determination of the board of management that there was 'a forfeiture, upon notice tó the relator, the rights of the relator, as a member of this club, cannot be affected.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPublic Service Interstate Transportation Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
129 N.J.L. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1942
The Board held that it was valid, distinguishing the case of Hudson County Bus Owners’ Association v. Board, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 1070; 143 Atl. Rep. 755 . … The Supreme Court said that the decision of the Board was erroneous in law, and ordered it set aside. Only the Board has appealed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWest Shore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
13 N.J. Misc. 180 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1935
These writs of certiorari bring up three separate determinations of the board of public utility commissioners, approving municipal permits granted to defendants Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, Public Service Interstate … West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 212; 149 Atl. Rep. 269 ; affirmed, 109 N. J. L. 260; 160 Atl. Rep. 491 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiller v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
11 N.J. Misc. 653 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1933
It is needless to say that under the authority of numerous cases of which it is only necessary to cite that of State Board v. Livesey, 140 Atl. Rep. 444 ; affirmed, 105 N. J. … The rules of the board, if any, are not printed nor identified so we cannot say that the court erred in their rejection.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Woodstown-Pilesgrove Regional Education Ass'n
81 N.J. 44 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
103 N.J.L. 33 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
Long Dock Co. v. Stale Board of Assessors, 82 N. J. … State Board, 100 Id. 131; Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 82 Id. 21.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState v. Inhabitants of Kearny
55 N.J.L. 50 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892
State v. Carragan, 8 Vroom 264 ; State v. Anderson, 9 Id. 173. In these respects the action of the board conformed to the ■requirements of the statute. … In Potter’s Dwarris 117, the distinction between a saving clause and a proviso is recognized, and in Townsend v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedChristian Bros. Institute v. Northern New Jersey Interscholastic League
86 N.J. 409 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1981
Bd. of Ed. v. Hunterdon Cent. High Sch. … See State v. Senno, 79 N.J. 216, 225-226 (1979); Taxpayers Ass’n of Weymouth Tp., Inc. v. Weymouth Tp., 80 N.J. 6, 37-38 (1976), cert, den., 430 U.S. 977 , 97 S.Ct. 1672 , 52 L.Ed.2d 373 (1977); State v.
Cited 24 timesPublished
Ask Donna