Case law

Robert W. Kennedy Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

102 N.J.L. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

The case of Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 38 N J. L. 1, was cited by the Supreme Court. … The views expressed by the board on this noint should be read: “The statute provides that the board may order the connection 'upon reasonable terms/ It appears that a siding from the petitioner’s land may readily be connected

State Ex Rel. Board of Health v. Slavonian Catholic Church

136 N.J. Eq. 560 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1945

See, in this connection, and also for a history of the litigation growing out of the assessment of the lands for taxation, the case of Township of Saddle River v.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

100 N.J.L. 138 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1924

Township of Maplewood v. Board of Education of School District

1 N.J. Misc. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923

The board of education refuses to pay because it claims that the property of school districts are exempt from the payment of an assessment for local improvements.

Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

102 N.J.L. 727 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1926

Eastern Boulevard Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of West New York

124 N.J.L. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1940

Jacobs v. Elwell, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 495; 151 Atl. Rep. 61 ; Hoffmeir v. Union City, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 839; 134 Atl. Rep. 610 ; Bimer v. West Hoboken, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 318; 128 Atl. Rep. 153 ; State v. Butler, 3 N. J. Mis. … Rep. 578 ; Troy v. Barnitt, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 275; 165 Atl. Rep. 576 ; Edell v. McDermott, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 272; 165 Atl. Rep. 719 ; Cooper v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, 114 N. J. L. 10; 175 Atl.

Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy

116 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1936

Mount Holly Township Board of Education v. Mount Holly Township Education Ass'n

199 N.J. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2009

Pascack Valley Regional Support, Staff Ass’n, 192 N.J. 489 , 933 A.2d 589 (2007), and Northvale Board of Education v. … The Board urges this Court to affirm the Appellate Division decision. The Board contends that the issue presented has already been resolved by Camden Board of Education v.

J.B. v. N.J. State Parole Bd.

226 N.J. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2016

State ex rel. Trustees of the Free Public Library v. Board of Finance

53 N.J.L. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1890

That board did not appropriate that sum, but did appropriate and raise $10,000. In taking this action, I think it is obvious that the board ■ of finance was' derelict in duty. … Brown v. Rahwayy 22 Vroom 279 ; Hopper v. Freeholders, 19 Atl.Rep. 383.

J.B. v. N.J. State Parole Bd.

226 N.J. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2016

J.B. v. N.J. State Parole Bd.

226 N.J. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2016

Cummins v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF LEONIA

21 N.J. 550 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1956

21 N.J. 550 (1956) 122 A.2d 672 JOSEPH CUMMINS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF LEONIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 21, 1956. Mr. Herbert L.

Medford Township Board of Education v. Medford Education Association

201 N.J. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 8, 2009

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in light of Mount Holly Township Board of Education v.

Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

89 N.J.L. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1916

Jersey City v. Jersey City and Bergen Railway, 70 N. J. L. 360; Jersey City v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 72 Id. 383; Newark v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 73 Id. 265. … Should the company apply to the utility board to hare the rate of fare increased, it would, undoubtedly. be met with its contract. The ease of Borough of North Wildwood v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 88 N. J.

Salem & Pennsgrove Traction Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1923

Crowell v. Jackson

53 N.J.L. 656 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891

We approve the conclusions reached by the Supreme Court of Indiana in The Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Reynolds, 44 Ind. 509 , which are directly in point with the. questions here raised. … For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 12. For reversal—None.

Board of Directors of Ajax Electrothermic Corp. v. First National Bank

33 N.J. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 21, 1960

Ajax Electrothermic Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of Princeton, 7 N. J. 82 (1951). … See Bango v. Ward, 12 N. J. 415, 420 (1953); Templeton v. Scudder, 16 N. J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 1951); Restatement, Judgments § 93 (1942).

Merchants & Manufacturers Fire Insurance v. Essex County Board of Taxation

15 N.J. Misc. 505 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1937

Prosecutors rely upon Township of Middletown et ad. v. Ivins et al., 102 N. J. L. 36; 130 Atl. Pep. 648, as authority for their application. … In Town of Union v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, 77 N J. L. 178; 71 Atl.

West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

85 N.J.L. 468 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1914

Mooney v. Edwards, 22 Vroom 479 ; Hugg v. Ivins, 30 Id. 139; Mathis v. Voorhees, 52 Id. 26. … The order of the board denying and dismissing the application is official action by it. Mathis v. Voorhees, 52 Vroom 26 ; Newark v. Lewis, Commissioner, 53 Id. 279; affirmed, 54 Id. 802.