Case law

Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures v. Board of Conservation & Development

90 N.J.L. 469 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1917

Section 3, this act, was referred to in Mundy v. Fountain, 76 N. J. L. 701; by the act approved April 8th, 1915 (Pamph. … incidents to make effective, if not efficient, the-approval and consent of the board.

Paterson Avenue & Secaucus Road Commissioners v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

44 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson to make an appropriation for, and place in the tax levy for the next fiscal year, the sum assessed against the … In the absence of such legislative authority, interest cannot be collected. *571 In City of Camden v.

Board of Education of City of Asbury Park v. Hoek

38 N.J. 497 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1962

38 N.J. 497 (1962) 185 A.2d 869 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. FLOYD G. HOEK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. November 12, 1962. Mr. Joseph N.

Essex County Park Commission v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

130 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1943

This writ of certiorari brings up an order by the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, dated April 28th, 1943, granting permission to Public Service Co-ordinated Transport to operate ten motor buses from Newark to West … It is argued that the Board reached a wrong result on the evidence before it. One answer,, and perhaps a sufficient one, is that by the express language of the statute the Board may act “without hearing.”

Gaines, Silvey & Nichols, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

124 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1940

Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures v. Board of Conservation & Development

91 N.J.L. 718 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1918

Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 279 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

United Real Estate Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 300 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283). For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White,'Williams, Gardner,.

Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

89 N.J.L. 734 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1916

Where, upon the application of a municipality, the Board of Public Utility Commissioners have found the rate charged by a gas company unreasonably high and have in consequence prescribed a lower rate, which lower rate the … municipality still thinks unreasonably high, the latter’s remedy is by certiorari to procure the setting aside of the order fixing such rate, so that the way may be open for the establishment by such board of such still

People's Bank & Trust Co. v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

90 N.J.L. 171 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

If the proceeding to test the board’s denial'of the deduct ion were by, mandamus, the relator could not expect to gut from the court a declaration that it was I he clear legal duty of the board to violate au express provision … The object of this provision, as Was pointed out in Commercial Trust Company v. Board of Taxation, 87 N. J.

Susan Seago v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund

Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 2024

(quoting Russo v. … Super. at 656); see also Skulski v.

Sullivan v. Clifton

55 N.J.L. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

McGhee v. Edwards, 87 Tenn. 507 ; Sargent v. Usher, 55 N. H. 287; Ingolls v. Vance (Vt.), 18 Atl. Rep. 452; Howes v. Newcomb, 15 N. E. Rep. 123. I have found but two cases holding otherwise — Smith v. … For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 10.

Ridgefield Park Education Ass'n v. Rigdefield Park Board of Education

75 N.J. 584 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1977

STATE BOARD OF MED. EXAMINERS OF NJ v. Warren Hosp.

54 N.J. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1969

54 N.J. 100 (1969) 253 A.2d 548 STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WARREN HOSPITAL, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 29, 1969. Mr. James A.

Trustees of the Presbytery v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

6 N.J. Misc. 500 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1928

judgment of the state hoard of taxes and assessment dated February 14th, 1928, denying the application of the prosecutor, trustees of the Presbytery of Newton, to be made a party to certain proceedings pending before the state board … With the conclusion reached and the reasons given by the state board of taxes and assessment we agree. The order, or judgment, of the state board of taxes and assessment is affirmed, with costs.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

83 N.J.L. 633 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1912

The writ in this case brings up for review a judgment of tlie Supreme Court affirming an order made by the board of public utility commissioners in August of last year, directing the Public Service Eailway Company to issue … The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the board, and in our opinion that affirmance was proper, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 715 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

City of East Orange v. Essex County Board of Taxation

10 N.J. Misc. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1931

This is an application on notice for the allowance of a writ of certiorari “to review a certain tax appeal made by The Sixty-seven South Munn, Incorporated, to the Essex county board of taxation involving taxes levied by

Township of North Bergen v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 236 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1925

Town of West Orange v. State Board of Tax Appeals

116 N.J.L. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936