Case law

New Jersey Power & Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

14 N.J. 15 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1953

Tice v. Commissioners of Long Branch

98 N.J.L. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The court said in the case of Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, 79 N. J. L. 494, 497, when no common standard is set up, no competition is proposed. … L. 145; MacKinnon v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 100 Atl. Rep. 694 ; Van Reipen v. Mayor, &c., of Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 262, 271; 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214, 222; Board of Finance v. Jersey City, 57 N. J.

City of Perth Amboy v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

4 N.J. Misc. 898 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1926

This matter has been heard upon a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review the decision of the board of public utility commissioners of January 7th, 1926, refusing to require the Central Eailroad … overhead bridge at Washington street, in the city of Perth Amboy, which bridge had been fully constructed and completed at a cost of $300,000 by such railroad companies, pursuant to and in compliance with the order of said board

New York Bay Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

84 N.J.L. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

The first contention made by the appellant is that the order of the board is not authorized by the statute creating it, and that, consequent!}1, the board had no jurisdiction to maké it. … It demonstrates, we think, the authority of the board to make such an order as that now complained of when conditions justify it.

Eastern Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 318 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1915

Eastern Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1915

Hillside Bus Owners' Ass'n v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

7 N.J. Misc. 52 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 3, 1929

C. F. Mueller Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 141 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1941

Lawrence Township v. State Board, &c., 124 N. J. L. 465; Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 Id. 174; Gannon v. State Board, 123 Id. 450.

Town of West Orange v. State Board of Tax Appeals

116 N.J.L. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

Borough of Hasbrouck Heights v. State Board of Tax Appeals

127 N.J.L. 562 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1942

El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

106 N.J.L. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1930

In Union Paper Co. v. Board of Assessors, 73 N. J. … In Pompton Steel Co. v. Wayne, 65 N. J. L. 487, an unexplained delay of three years in prosecuting a writ of certiorari to remove an assessment of taxes was held to be laches.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

97 N.J.L. 30 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 8, 1922

He operated the jitney accordingly until shortly before September 13th, 1921, when he sold the bus to Jacob V. Meóla. … It was necessary for him to obtain, arid he did obtain, after March, loth, 1921, a municipal consent, and that consent was not valid until approved by tlie board The exclusion from tlie jurisdiction and control of the board

Dickinson v. Inhabitants of Plainfield

116 N.J.L. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1936

Marten v. Brown, 81 Id. 599. * * *.” And a point raised but not argued is held to have been waived and abandoned and will not be considered in an appellate tribunal. … Sargeant Bros., Inc., v. Brancati, 107 N. J. L. 84; Kip v. People's Bank and Trust Co., 110 Id. 178; Mimnagh v. Falato, Id. 266; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Central Lumber Co., 112 Id. 522, 529.

Mayor of Rahway v. Board of Health

80 N.J.L. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1910

Suburban Land Co. v. Vailsburgh, 39 Vroom 311 ; Stanton v. Board of Education, Id. 496; 41 Id. 336. … of health; and with chapter 299, reorganizing the latter board.

In re Brown

123 N.J. 571 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1991

*572 ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that RONALD D. … BROWN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violation of RPC 1.15(a) (failure to hold client property in a separate trust account

Balsley v. North Hunterdon Regional High School Board of Education

114 N.J. 287 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1988

New Jersey State AFL-CIO v. Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders

122 N.J. 377 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 24, 1990

Mount Holly Township Board of Education v. Mount Holly Township Education Ass'n

199 N.J. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2009

Pascack Valley Regional Support, Staff Ass’n, 192 N.J. 489 , 933 A.2d 589 (2007), and Northvale Board of Education v. … The Board urges this Court to affirm the Appellate Division decision. The Board contends that the issue presented has already been resolved by Camden Board of Education v.

Hillside Bus Owners Ass'n v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

7 N.J. Misc. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1929

not presently existing, if it does arise will present a proper ground for appeal to the board and a regulation in that direction. … The third ground is that there was before the board no approval of such re-routing by the borough of Eairview. Of this, however, prosecutors cannot complain. They are not affected thereby.