Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.67s
State Ex Rel. Board of Health v. Slavonian Catholic Church
136 N.J. Eq. 560 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1945
See, in this connection, and also for a history of the litigation growing out of the assessment of the lands for taxation, the case of Township of Saddle River v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDelaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
100 N.J.L. 138 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1924
Cited 0 timesPublishedTownship of Maplewood v. Board of Education of School District
1 N.J. Misc. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923
The board of education refuses to pay because it claims that the property of school districts are exempt from the payment of an assessment for local improvements.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
102 N.J.L. 727 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1926
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrank P. Farrell, Inc. v. Bd. of Education of Newark
137 N.J.L. 408 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 16, 1948
Sellitto v. Cedar Grove, 133 N. J. L. 41. … In Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, 79 N. J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedEastern Boulevard Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of West New York
124 N.J.L. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1940
Jacobs v. Elwell, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 495; 151 Atl. Rep. 61 ; Hoffmeir v. Union City, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 839; 134 Atl. Rep. 610 ; Bimer v. West Hoboken, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 318; 128 Atl. Rep. 153 ; State v. Butler, 3 N. J. Mis. … Rep. 578 ; Troy v. Barnitt, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 275; 165 Atl. Rep. 576 ; Edell v. McDermott, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 272; 165 Atl. Rep. 719 ; Cooper v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, 114 N. J. L. 10; 175 Atl.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPublic Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
87 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1915
This appeal is brought to review a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming an order of the board of public utility commissioners, requiring the prosecutor to pay compensation to the counties of Hudson and Essex for the use … The case of Bangor Railway and Electric Co. v. Orono, 84 Atl. Rep. 385 , is quite similar to the present case. There being no error in this record, the judgment will be ■affirmed, with costs.
Cited 1 timesPublished111 N.J. Eq. 337 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1932
See, also, Shields v. Lozear, 34 N. J. Law 496 (at p. 503); Osborne v. Tunis, 25 N. J. Law 633 (at p. 651); Montgomery v. Bruere, 4 N. J. Law 295 (at pp. 309, 320); Bell v. Fleming’s Executors, 12 N. J. Eq. 13; Magie v. … Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearing Co., 90 N. J. Eq. 515; John Agnew Co. v. Paterson Board of Education, 83 N. J. Eq. 49.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJersey Central Power & Light Co. v. State Board of Tax Apeals
131 N.J.L. 565 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 1944
L., p. 567) shortly after the determination of the Supreme Court in the case of Eastern Pennsylvania Power Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, 103 N. J. L. 281. … See, also, Chalmers v. Suburban Telephone Co., 66 N. J. L. 41; Atlantic City Gas and Water Co. v. Consumers’ Gas and Fuel Co., 70 N. J. Eq. 536. .
Cited 9 timesPublished1 N.J.L. 175 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1792
It is admitted that Mary Martin, the wife of Brown, was the heir-at-law of the devisor.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTice v. Commissioners of Long Branch
98 N.J.L. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922
The court said in the case of Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, 79 N. J. L. 494, 497, when no common standard is set up, no competition is proposed. … L. 145; MacKinnon v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 100 Atl. Rep. 694 ; Van Reipen v. Mayor, &c., of Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 262, 271; 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214, 222; Board of Finance v. Jersey City, 57 N. J.
Cited 13 timesPublishedTownship of Cedar Grove v. Essex County Board of Taxation
47 N.J. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1966
Cited 0 timesPublishedPassaic Consolidated Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
104 N.J.L. 666 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 1928
Cited 0 timesPublishedCastellini v. New Jersey State Board of Examiners of Nurses
101 N.J.L. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1925
persons who should desire to be registered as graduate nurses should submit themselves to an examination by the board, and that in order to be eligible for such examination they must show to the satisfaction of the board … The relator is entitled to a peremptory mandamus compelling the state board of examiners to register her as a graduate nurse.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYoung Men's Christian Ass'n v. State Board of Tax Appeals
14 N.J. Misc. 847 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 12, 1936
In the essential facts and the principles of law to be applied, this case cannot be distinguished from that of The Young Men’s Christian Association of Ridgewood v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 117 N. J. L. 196.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWestern Union Telegraph Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 729 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited New Jersey Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
4 N.J. Misc. 828 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
The properties are the identical ones considered in case No. 303, &c., United New Jersey, &c., Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, May term, 1936. … They were submitted to the state board in 1934 record, and affirmed by a unanimous vote of the board. The same disposition is made of these cases as was made of those cases, and for the same reasons.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. New Jersey State Board of Tax Appeals
118 N.J.L. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 1937
The board then held that the second construction should be adopted because the first construction would or might render the act unconstitutional under the case of Tippett v. McGrath, Collector, 70 N. J. … The judgment of the state board of tax appeals is reversed, and that of the county board affirmed, with costs.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDunbar v. Board of Excise of Elizabeth
82 N.J.L. 30 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1911
The prosecutor seeks to set aside a malt liquor license granted by the board of excise to James Eocarile. … Wilson, Attorney-General, v. Fromm, 51 Id. 582. This act empowers the board of excise to prescribe by ordinance the form of application to be used.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Jersey Power & Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
14 N.J. 15 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1953
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
Ask Donna