Case law

Township of North Bergen v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

2 N.J. Misc. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1924

L. 1905 (p. 126) provides that when complaint shall be made to the board the board shall have the power to review and correct the action of the local assessors or other taxing officers and of all hoards on tax review, by … In the instant case not only was the consent of the assessor given, but there was also given the consent of the county tax board, the latter apparently in pursuance of the rule and practice of the board in such cases.

Robert W. Kennedy Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

3 N.J. Misc. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1925

Armstrong v."Pennsylvania- Railroad Co38 N. J. L. 4. … Our reading of it leads us to the conclusion that there was evidence before the board to support reasonably the order made. Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 95 N. J. L. 295.

State ex rel. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Pennsylvania Railroad

42 N.J.L. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1880

Moulin v. Insurance Co., 4 Zab. 222; S. C., 1 Dutcher 57; National Condensed Milk Co. v. Brandenburgh, 11 Vroom 111 .

Inhabitants of the Township of Eatontown v. Board of Assessors

51 N.J.L. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1888

In its absence, the board fixed the valuation of the taxable property in the township at $1,200,000, and thus ascertained its proportion of tax, and the evidence taken satisfies us that in so doing the members of the board … The action of the board is affirmed, with costs.

Newark Farmers Market, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

131 N.J.L. 508 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 1944

There was an appeal lo the County Board of Taxation, which cut down the valuation in both cases to $36,300, or a little over $800 a lot. … Then there was an appeal to the State Board of Tax Appeals arid that body raised the valuation to $42,000 for each block or about $950 a lot.

Hillside Bus Owners Ass'n v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

7 N.J. Misc. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1929

not presently existing, if it does arise will present a proper ground for appeal to the board and a regulation in that direction. … The third ground is that there was before the board no approval of such re-routing by the borough of Eairview. Of this, however, prosecutors cannot complain. They are not affected thereby.

Turkington v. Zuber

100 N.J. Eq. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926

Cooper v. Colson, 66 N. J. Eq. 328; Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. 650; Wallace v. Brown, 10 N. J. Eq. 308. Tested by that rule we believe that part performance has not been shown. … Cooper v. Colson, supra; Vreeland v. Vreeland, 53 N. J. Eq. 387; Wharton v. Stoughtenburgh, supra; Brown v. Brown, supra; Wallace v. Brown, supra. Here the proofs do not satisfy that test.

Passaic Consolidated Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 1078 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1927

To these figures the board objected. … State v. Paterson, 129 S. W. Rep. 892 . In Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 96 N. J.

D.L. Real Estate Holdings, L.L.C. v. Point Pleasant Beach Planning Board

176 N.J. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 2003

In Divan Builders, Inc. v. … In Palatine I v.

Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy

116 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1936

Talty v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, SCH. DIST. OF CITY OF HOBOKEN

10 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1952

Talty v. Board of Education of Hoboken, 11 N. J. Super. 122 (Law Div. 1950). The Appellate Division affirmed for reasons stated in the opinion of the Law Division. Talty v. Board of Education of Hoboken, 16 N. J. … In Fox v. Board of Education, 129 N. J. L. 349 (Sup. Ct. 1943), affirmed 130 N. J.

Hogencamp v. Ackerman

24 N.J.L. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1853

Brown, do covenant and bind ourselves, our heirs, &c., and agree to and with the said William S. … Pierce v. Blake, Salk. 515; Solomon v. Lyon, 1 East. 370; Davis v. Clerke, Croke Jac. 64.

Clark v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

79 N.J.L. 454 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1910

Colonial Trust Co. v. Scheffey (par curiam); Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 49 Vroom 302 . … Colonial Trust Co. v.

Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. State Board of Tax Apeals

131 N.J.L. 565 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 1944

L., p. 567) shortly after the determination of the Supreme Court in the case of Eastern Pennsylvania Power Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, 103 N. J. L. 281. … See, also, Chalmers v. Suburban Telephone Co., 66 N. J. L. 41; Atlantic City Gas and Water Co. v. Consumers’ Gas and Fuel Co., 70 N. J. Eq. 536. .

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

96 N.J.L. 54 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1921

Another reason given Cor the action of the board is that no deficit in the cost of operation exists, based on the emergency theory, which it. is. claimed is justified, by the opinion of Mi'. Justice Swayze in O’Brien v. … anything to advance the present rate which the evidence shows is not just and reasonable in view of existing conditions. ■ Chief Justice White, speaking for the Supreme Court of the United States in Southern, Iowa Electric Co. v.

Santa Cruz v. Board of Review, Department of Labor & Industry

126 N.J. 312 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1991

Den v. Little

1 N.J.L. 175 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1792

It is admitted that Mary Martin, the wife of Brown, was the heir-at-law of the devisor.

Tice v. Commissioners of Long Branch

98 N.J.L. 214 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The court said in the case of Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, 79 N. J. L. 494, 497, when no common standard is set up, no competition is proposed. … L. 145; MacKinnon v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 100 Atl. Rep. 694 ; Van Reipen v. Mayor, &c., of Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 262, 271; 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214, 222; Board of Finance v. Jersey City, 57 N. J.

Township Committee of Morris v. Board of Education of Morris

60 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 22, 1972

Board of Education of Township of Morristown, et al. (D. N. J. Jan. 12, 1972); cf. Adams v. City of Colorado Springs, 308 F. Supp. 1397 (D. Colo.), aff'd mem., 399 U. S. 901 , 90 S. Ct. 2197 , 26 L. … Ed. 2d 93 (1970); see also Bd. of Ed. of Elizabeth v. City Coun. of Elizabeth, 55 N. J. 501 (1970); Bd. of Ed., E. Brunswick Tp. v. Tp. Council, E. Brunswick, 48 N. J. 94 (1966); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N. J.

Phillips v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD

24 N.J. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1957

24 N.J. 465 (1957) 132 A.2d 558 CHARLES ALAN PHILLIPS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 10, 1957.